본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

aws-cloudwatch-investigation

Investigate AWS production incidents using reusable CloudWatch log queries and metric calculations. Narrow affected resources, compare alarms with deployment events, and reconstruct a timeline to identify changes that may explain the symptoms.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Reusable investigation patterns for AWS CloudWatch: Logs Insights query templates, alarm-to-deployment correlation, blast-radius narrowing decision tree, and PromQL-style metric query patterns for structured incident triage.

연동 도구AWS
설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Investigate error spikes, slow responses, and memory exhaustion
  • Compare alarm transitions with recent deployments
  • Narrow an incident to affected services and resources
  • Reconstruct an incident timeline from logs and metrics

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

AWS CloudWatch Investigation Skill

Reusable patterns for investigating production incidents using CloudWatch Logs, Metrics, and Alarms. These patterns are designed to be composed together during incident triage.


Pattern 1: Logs Insights Query Templates

Error Spike Detection

Find the top errors in a time window, grouped by error type:

fields @timestamp, @message, @logStream
| filter @message like /(?i)(error|exception|fatal|critical)/
| stats count(*) as errorCount by bin(5m), @logStream
| sort errorCount desc
| limit 20

P99 Latency Breakdown by Operation

Identify which operations are driving latency spikes:

fields @timestamp, @duration, operation
| filter ispresent(@duration)
| stats avg(@duration) as avgMs,
        pct(@duration, 50) as p50Ms,
        pct(@duration, 95) as p95Ms,
        pct(@duration, 99) as p99Ms,
        count(*) as invocations
  by operation
| sort p99Ms desc
| limit 15

Lambda Cold Start Detection

Quantify cold start impact during an incident:

fields @timestamp, @duration, @initDuration, @memorySize, @maxMemoryUsed
| filter ispresent(@initDuration)
| stats count(*) as coldStarts,
        avg(@initDuration) as avgInitMs,
        max(@initDuration) as maxInitMs,
        avg(@duration) as avgDurationMs
  by bin(5m)
| sort @timestamp desc

Out-of-Memory (OOM) Detection

Find Lambda functions or containers killed by memory pressure:

fields @timestamp, @message, @logStream, @memorySize, @maxMemoryUsed
| filter @message like /Runtime exited|out of memory|OOMKilled|Cannot allocate memory|MemoryError/
| stats count(*) as oomEvents by @logStream, bin(10m)
| sort oomEvents desc
| limit 10

For memory utilization trending before OOM:

fields @timestamp, @maxMemoryUsed, @memorySize
| filter ispresent(@maxMemoryUsed)
| stats max(@maxMemoryUsed / @memorySize * 100) as peakMemPct,
        avg(@maxMemoryUsed / @memorySize * 100) as avgMemPct
  by bin(5m)
| sort @timestamp desc

Timeout Detection

Find invocations that hit the configured timeout:

fields @timestamp, @duration, @logStream, @requestId
| filter @message like /Task timed out/ or @duration > 28000
| stats count(*) as timeouts by @logStream, bin(5m)
| sort timeouts desc

Pattern 2: Alarm History to Deploy-Event Correlation

Process

  1. Get alarm transition time — note the exact timestamp when the alarm entered ALARM state.
  2. Query CloudTrail for deployment-related events in a window of [alarm_time - 30min, alarm_time]:
# CloudTrail Lake query for deployment events
SELECT eventTime, eventName, userIdentity.arn, requestParameters
FROM <event-data-store-id>
WHERE eventTime > '<alarm_time_minus_30m>'
  AND eventTime < '<alarm_time>'
  AND eventName IN (
    'UpdateFunctionCode', 'UpdateFunctionConfiguration',
    'UpdateService', 'CreateDeployment', 'RegisterTaskDefinition',
    'CreateChangeSet', 'ExecuteChangeSet',
    'StartPipelineExecution', 'PutImage'
  )
ORDER BY eventTime DESC
  1. Correlation criteria — a deploy is "correlated" if:

    • It targets the same service/resource as the alarm
    • It completed within 15 minutes before the alarm transition
    • The deployer identity matches a CI/CD role (not a human applying a hotfix)
  2. Strengthening the correlation:

    • Check if the same alarm was healthy in the previous deployment cycle
    • Verify no other environmental changes (scaling events, config changes) in the same window
    • Look for canary/synthetic monitor failures that started at the same time

Output Format

Deploy Correlation:
  Event: UpdateFunctionCode
  Time: 2024-03-15T14:23:07Z (12 min before alarm)
  Actor: arn:aws:sts::123456789012:assumed-role/github-actions-deploy/session
  Resource: arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:123456789012:function:payment-processor
  Correlation: STRONG — same resource, CI/CD actor, alarm was OK prior cycle

Pattern 3: Narrow the Blast Radius Decision Tree

Use this tree to systematically scope an incident from broadest to most specific:

START
  |
  v
[1] ACCOUNT — Which account(s) show the alarm?
  |  - Check: Are alarms firing in multiple accounts?
  |  - If yes → suspect shared service (SSO, networking, shared deployment pipeline)
  |  - If no → proceed to Region
  v
[2] REGION — Which region(s) are affected?
  |  - Check: Same alarm in other regions?
  |  - If multi-region → suspect global service (IAM, Route53, S3 global)
  |  - If single-region → proceed to Service
  v
[3] SERVICE — Which service namespace shows degradation?
  |  - Check CloudWatch namespace: AWS/Lambda, AWS/ECS, AWS/ApiGateway, etc.
  |  - If multiple services → suspect shared dependency (VPC, NAT, DNS, IAM)
  |  - If single service → proceed to Operation
  v
[4] OPERATION — Which API action or function is failing?
  |  - For Lambda: which function name?
  |  - For ECS: which service/task definition?
  |  - For API GW: which stage/resource/method?
  |  - If all operations → suspect service-level issue (throttling, quota)
  |  - If specific operation → proceed to Resource
  v
[5] RESOURCE — Which specific resource instance?
     - Function ARN, Task ID, DB instance identifier
     - This is your investigation target
     - Proceed to log and trace analysis scoped to this resource

Shared Dependency Investigation

When blast radius spans multiple services, investigate in this order:

  1. VPC/Networking — NAT Gateway ErrorPortAllocation, packet drops, DNS resolution failures
  2. IAM/STS — ThrottlingException on AssumeRole, token vending latency
  3. Downstream dependency — shared database, cache, or external API
  4. Deployment pipeline — simultaneous deploys across services from same pipeline run
  5. AWS service event — check AWS Health Dashboard and Service Health for the region

Pattern 4: PromQL-Style Metric Query Patterns

These patterns use CloudWatch metric math and GetMetricData to build composite signals. Express them as metric queries for dashboards or programmatic retrieval.

Error Rate as Percentage

MetricDataQueries:
  - Id: errors
    MetricStat:
      Metric:
        Namespace: AWS/Lambda
        MetricName: Errors
        Dimensions: [{Name: FunctionName, Value: TARGET}]
      Period: 60
      Stat: Sum
  - Id: invocations
    MetricStat:
      Metric:
        Namespace: AWS/Lambda
        MetricName: Invocations
        Dimensions: [{Name: FunctionName, Value: TARGET}]
      Period: 60
      Stat: Sum
  - Id: error_rate
    Expression: "errors / invocations * 100"
    Label: "Error Rate %"

Latency Anomaly Detection (Compare to Baseline)

MetricDataQueries:
  - Id: current_p99
    MetricStat:
      Metric:
        Namespace: AWS/Lambda
        MetricName: Duration
        Dimensions: [{Name: FunctionName, Value: TARGET}]
      Period: 300
      Stat: p99
  - Id: baseline_p99
    MetricStat:
      Metric:
        Namespace: AWS/Lambda
        MetricName: Duration
        Dimensions: [{Name: FunctionName, Value: TARGET}]
      Period: 300
      Stat: p99
    # Use StartTime/EndTime set to same window last week
  - Id: anomaly_ratio
    Expression: "current_p99 / baseline_p99"
    Label: "Latency vs Baseline (ratio > 2 = anomaly)"

Throttling Pressure Score

Combine multiple throttling signals into a single pressure metric:

MetricDataQueries:
  - Id: lambda_throttles
    MetricStat:
      Metric: {Namespace: AWS/Lambda, MetricName: Throttles}
      Period: 60
      Stat: Sum
  - Id: api_gw_429s
    MetricStat:
      Metric: {Namespace: AWS/ApiGateway, MetricName: 4XXError, Dimensions: [{Name: ApiName, Value: TARGET}]}
      Period: 60
      Stat: Sum
  - Id: dynamo_throttles
    MetricStat:
      Metric: {Namespace: AWS/DynamoDB, MetricName: ThrottledRequests, Dimensions: [{Name: TableName, Value: TARGET}]}
      Period: 60
      Stat: Sum
  - Id: throttle_pressure
    Expression: "lambda_throttles + api_gw_429s + dynamo_throttles"
    Label: "Combined Throttle Pressure"

Concurrent Execution Headroom

MetricDataQueries:
  - Id: concurrent
    MetricStat:
      Metric: {Namespace: AWS/Lambda, MetricName: ConcurrentExecutions}
      Period: 60
      Stat: Maximum
  - Id: headroom
    Expression: "1000 - concurrent"
    Label: "Remaining Concurrency (account limit 1000)"

Pattern 5: Incident Timeline Reconstruction

Process

Reconstruct a precise timeline by merging data from multiple sources:

  1. Collect timestamps:
SourceQueryYields
CloudWatch AlarmsAlarm history APIState transition times
CloudWatch MetricsGetMetricData with 1-min periodFirst anomaly point
CloudWatch LogsLogs Insights with earliest(@timestamp)First error occurrence
CloudTrailLookupEvents filtered by timeDeployment/change events
AWS HealthDescribeEventsAWS-side incidents
  1. Build the timeline:
fields @timestamp, @message
| filter @message like /ERROR|WARN|timeout|refused|denied/
| stats earliest(@timestamp) as firstSeen, latest(@timestamp) as lastSeen, count(*) as occurrences
  by @message
| sort firstSeen asc
| limit 20
  1. Identify the sequence:
Timeline:
  T-15m: CloudTrail — UpdateFunctionCode by CI/CD role
  T-12m: Logs — first error "Connection refused to payments-api.internal"
  T-10m: Metrics — Error count crosses 5/min threshold
  T-8m:  Alarm — PaymentProcessorErrors enters ALARM
  T-5m:  Metrics — p99 latency spikes to 28s (timeout)
  T-0:   Current — error rate at 45%, alarm still firing
  1. Determine root event — the earliest change that preceded all symptoms. Walk backward from the first symptom to the most recent mutation (deploy, config change, scaling event, or external dependency shift).

Gotchas

  • CloudWatch metric timestamps are end-of-period. A 1-minute datapoint at 14:05 covers 14:04-14:05.
  • CloudTrail events can have up to 15-minute delivery delay. Use eventTime, not ingestion time.
  • Log group timestamps depend on the agent/SDK flush interval. Allow for 30-60s of clock skew.
  • Alarm state changes have a built-in evaluation delay (periods x evaluation periods). The actual anomaly started earlier.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

github의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고