본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

bug-receipt

Document bug fixes and incident recovery with a structured receipt covering the problem, cause, change, and verification evidence. Distinguishes verified results from partial or blocked work, identifies missing proof, and specifies the next check needed to close the gap.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Close defects and incidents with a BUG RECEIPT and VERIFIED, PARTIAL, or BLOCKED status after diagnosis, repair, or recovery.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Record the evidence supporting a bug fix
  • Report missing checks after a partial repair
  • Document an incident blocked by an external condition
  • Produce a machine-readable receipt for CI

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB
  • assets/receipt.template.json573 B
  • references/receipt-contract.md1.8 KB
  • references/receipt.schema.json3.5 KB
  • scripts/validate-receipt.mjs7.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Bug Receipt

Mandatory closeout output

For every bug or incident closeout decision, return the complete receipt below as the entire user-facing result, even when the user requests a concise reply or does not name this format. Concision shortens field values; it never removes or renames a row. Do not replace the receipt with prose.

BUG RECEIPT · VERIFIED | PARTIAL | BLOCKED

Problem    <observed defect and intended behavior>
Baseline   <failing interaction or command and decisive result; or not run>
Root cause <proven mechanism; or unproven hypothesis>
Change     <responsible change; or none>
Proof      <supplied or executed check: result; include every decisive layer>
Gaps       <none; or exact missing proof and single next experiment/package>
Source     executed now | supplied | mixed

Use not run, unproven, or none explicitly. Never omit a row to make the receipt look complete.

Establish the evidence boundary

Before editing, record the observed problem, intended behavior, strongest direct check, and evidence source: executed now, supplied, or mixed. Never imply that supplied evidence was executed in the current run.

Keep evidence privacy-minimal. Redact credentials, tokens, cookies, personal data, private URLs, and sensitive payloads; preserve only the identifiers and excerpts needed to reproduce or correlate the failure.

Reproduce the failure with the narrowest safe check when possible. If reproduction is unavailable, preserve the evidence obtained and cap the result at PARTIAL or BLOCKED.

Trace and repair

  1. Follow the live owner path from input to symptom.
  2. Separate observed facts, bounded inferences, and gaps.
  3. Require a concrete location or runtime transition before naming root cause.
  4. Make the smallest responsible change; avoid unrelated cleanup, retries, silent fallbacks, and fixture-specific exceptions.

Do not convert a plausible patch, stale log, source read, or passing build into proof of the user-visible behavior.

Close the proof loop

Run only checks required by the affected contract:

  • original reproduction or direct acceptance check;
  • nearest negative or regression check;
  • affected build or integration gate;
  • real UI, API, persistence, concurrency, or runtime path when the claim crosses that boundary.

Use these decisive boundaries:

SurfaceRequired direct proof
Logic or failing testOriginal failing input or focused test now passes
UI behaviorReal interaction plus relevant console and network observation
API or integrationRequest, response, and responsible service behavior
PersistenceWrite/read or reload round trip through the real owner path
Race or lifecycleRepeated concurrent trigger; zero-or-one success; affected-row and transaction evidence; final invariant
Cross-system blockerOne sanitized failing request/response with timestamp or request ID, edge and application logs, and identity-provider logs when the trace reaches that owner

Assign status

  • VERIFIED: observed baseline, concrete cause, responsible change, all declared checks passed, no material gap.
  • PARTIAL: useful evidence exists, but a required proof layer is missing or inconclusive.
  • BLOCKED: a specific external condition prevents reproduction, repair, or proof.

For PARTIAL or BLOCKED, name the single minimal experiment or correlated evidence package that closes the decisive gap. Never invent a command, observation, count, location, or result.

For a machine-readable receipt or CI integration, read references/receipt-contract.md and conform to its JSON fields, evidence-source marker, compatibility rule, and status invariants.

When a JSON artifact is requested, start from assets/receipt.template.json, write it to a task-owned path, and validate it with node scripts/validate-receipt.mjs <receipt.json> from this skill directory. Do not commit the generated receipt unless the user requests it.

Source and license

Originally published at https://github.com/lMysticl/bug-receipt under the MIT License.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

github의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고