본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

pinecone-rag

Build systems that use Pinecone to find documents for AI answers or retain agent memories across sessions. Guides index setup, data loading, meaning-based and keyword search, memory separation, and end-to-end checks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Build production RAG pipelines and persistent agent memory using Pinecone as the vector database backend. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user mentions Pinecone, wants to index documents for semantic search, build a retrieval-augmented generation system, store agent memory across sessions, implement hybrid search, or connect an LLM to a searchable knowledge base — even if they don't say "Pinecone" explicitly. Also use when the user asks about vector databases for RAG, namespace isolation for multi-tenant agents, embedding pipelines, or scaling a knowledge base beyond what local storage can handle. DO NOT use for local-only vector stores (Chroma, FAISS, pgvector) or pure keyword search with no semantic component.

연동 도구OpenAI
설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Build an AI assistant that answers from documents
  • Keep agent facts and decisions across sessions
  • Combine meaning-based search with exact terminology
  • Separate stored memories by user or agent

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md9.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Pinecone RAG Skill

This skill guides you through building a production RAG pipeline or persistent agent memory system using Pinecone. Follow the workflow from start to finish — don't skip steps or jump to code before understanding what the user actually needs.

Before you start — ask one question

Before writing any code, identify which of these two use cases applies:

A — RAG over documents: User wants to index a corpus (PDFs, docs, code, web pages) and retrieve relevant chunks to ground LLM responses.

B — Agent memory: User wants an agent to remember facts, decisions, or context across sessions or across multiple agents sharing a knowledge base.

The setup is similar but the namespace strategy and retrieval patterns differ. If the user hasn't said, ask: "Is this for document retrieval, agent memory, or both?" Then follow the relevant workflow below.


Step 1 — Choose your index configuration

Pick the index type before writing any code. Getting this wrong means re-creating the index later.

Serverless (recommended for most cases)

from pinecone import Pinecone, ServerlessSpec

pc = Pinecone(api_key="PINECONE_API_KEY")

if "my-index" not in pc.list_indexes().names():
    pc.create_index(
        name="my-index",
        dimension=1536,        # must match your embedding model exactly
        metric="cosine",
        spec=ServerlessSpec(cloud="aws", region="us-east-1")
    )
index = pc.Index("my-index")

Pod-based (for consistent high-throughput production)

from pinecone import PodSpec

pc.create_index(
    name="my-index-prod",
    dimension=1536,
    metric="cosine",
    spec=PodSpec(environment="us-east1-gcp", pod_type="p1.x1")
)

Dimension quick reference — match this exactly to your embedding model:

ModelDimension
text-embedding-3-small1536
text-embedding-3-large3072
voyage-3 / voyage-multimodal-31024
BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.51024
intfloat/multilingual-e5-large (Arabic, Malay, Chinese)1024

Checkpoint: Index exists, dimension matches embedding model, index.describe_index_stats() returns without error.


Step 2 — Embed and upsert documents

Always batch upserts — never upsert one vector at a time.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

def embed(texts: list[str]) -> list[list[float]]:
    res = client.embeddings.create(model="text-embedding-3-small", input=texts)
    return [r.embedding for r in res.data]

def upsert_docs(index, docs: list[dict], namespace: str = "default"):
    """docs = [{"id": "...", "text": "...", "metadata": {...}}]"""
    BATCH = 100
    for i in range(0, len(docs), BATCH):
        batch = docs[i:i + BATCH]
        vecs = [
            {
                "id": d["id"],
                "values": emb,
                "metadata": {**d.get("metadata", {}), "text": d["text"]}
            }
            for d, emb in zip(batch, embed([d["text"] for d in batch]))
        ]
        index.upsert(vectors=vecs, namespace=namespace)

Always store the original text in metadata — this avoids a second lookup at retrieval time.

Checkpoint: index.describe_index_stats() shows vector count > 0 in the target namespace.


Step 3 — Choose retrieval strategy

Dense (semantic) search — use for most cases

def search(index, query: str, top_k: int = 5, namespace: str = "default",
           filter: dict = None) -> list[dict]:
    [q_emb] = embed([query])
    results = index.query(
        vector=q_emb, top_k=top_k, namespace=namespace,
        include_metadata=True, filter=filter
    )
    return [{"text": m.metadata["text"], "score": m.score, "id": m.id}
            for m in results.matches]

Hybrid search (semantic + BM25 keyword) — use when corpus has exact terminology

Use hybrid when the domain has precise terms that semantic search misses: legal citations, medical codes, product SKUs, API method names.

from pinecone_text.sparse import BM25Encoder

bm25 = BM25Encoder().default()
bm25.fit([d["text"] for d in docs])  # fit once on your corpus

def hybrid_search(index, query: str, top_k: int = 5, alpha: float = 0.7):
    """alpha=1.0 is pure dense; alpha=0.0 is pure sparse."""
    dense = [v * alpha for v in embed([query])[0]]
    sparse_raw = bm25.encode_queries(query)
    sparse = {
        "indices": sparse_raw["indices"],
        "values": [v * (1 - alpha) for v in sparse_raw["values"]]
    }
    return index.query(vector=dense, sparse_vector=sparse,
                       top_k=top_k, include_metadata=True).matches

Metadata filtering — use to scope results before semantic ranking

# Exact match
results = index.query(vector=emb, filter={"source": {"$eq": "confluence"}})

# Combined filter
results = index.query(vector=emb, filter={
    "$and": [
        {"category": {"$eq": "engineering"}},
        {"language": {"$in": ["en", "ar"]}}
    ]
})

Checkpoint: A test query returns relevant results with scores > 0.7 for clearly matching content.


Step 4A — Full RAG pipeline (document use case)

def rag_answer(index, question: str, namespace: str = "default",
               model: str = "gpt-4o-mini") -> str:
    hits = search(index, question, top_k=5, namespace=namespace)
    context = "\n\n".join(h["text"] for h in hits)

    return client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {
                "role": "system",
                "content": (
                    "Answer using only the provided context. "
                    "If the answer isn't in the context, say so.\n\n"
                    f"Context:\n{context}"
                )
            },
            {"role": "user", "content": question}
        ]
    ).choices[0].message.content

Step 4B — Agent memory (memory use case)

Use namespaces to isolate each agent's or user's memories completely. Namespace per agent prevents memory bleed across users or sessions.

import time, hashlib

def remember(index, agent_id: str, content: str,
             memory_type: str = "fact"):
    """Store a memory for an agent."""
    mem_id = hashlib.md5(
        f"{agent_id}{content}{time.time()}".encode()
    ).hexdigest()
    [emb] = embed([content])
    index.upsert(
        vectors=[{
            "id": mem_id,
            "values": emb,
            "metadata": {
                "text": content,
                "type": memory_type,
                "timestamp": time.time(),
                "agent_id": agent_id
            }
        }],
        namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}"
    )

def recall(index, agent_id: str, query: str,
           top_k: int = 5) -> list[str]:
    """Recall relevant memories for an agent."""
    return [h["text"] for h in
            search(index, query, top_k=top_k,
                   namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}")]

def forget(index, agent_id: str):
    """Wipe all memories for an agent (e.g., on user request)."""
    index.delete(delete_all=True, namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}")

Step 5 — Wire it together and test end to end

Run a quick smoke test before integrating into the larger system:

# Smoke test
upsert_docs(index, [
    {"id": "t1", "text": "Pinecone is a vector database for semantic search."},
    {"id": "t2", "text": "RAG combines retrieval with language model generation."},
])

hits = search(index, "What is Pinecone?")
assert hits[0]["score"] > 0.7, f"Expected high similarity, got {hits[0]['score']}"
print("Smoke test passed:", hits[0]["text"])

Checkpoint: Smoke test passes. End-to-end: index → upsert → query → LLM response works without errors.


Common pitfalls — fix these before they become bugs

  • Dimension mismatch: always verify len(embed(["test"])[0]) matches the index dimension before your first upsert.
  • Missing text in metadata: if you don't store "text" in metadata, you'll need a second lookup to get the actual content at query time.
  • Single-vector upserts in a loop: always batch in chunks of 100.
  • No namespace strategy: decide upfront — one namespace per user/agent prevents cross-tenant data leaks that are hard to fix later.
  • Fitting BM25 on a small corpus: BM25 needs a representative corpus to build good term frequencies. Fit on at least a few hundred documents.

When NOT to use this skill

Use a different approach when:

  • The dataset fits in memory and latency doesn't matter → use FAISS or Chroma
  • You're already on PostgreSQL and want to avoid a new service → use pgvector
  • You need sub-5ms p99 latency with no external API calls → local vector store
  • The user explicitly wants a different vector DB (Weaviate, Qdrant, etc.)

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

github의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고