본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

resume-screener

Screen resumes efficiently against job requirements with structured scoring, red flag identification, and interview recommendations

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills스타 150(GitHub 150 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md9.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Resume Screener

Systematically evaluate resumes against job requirements to identify qualified candidates, flag concerns, and prioritize for interviews.

When to Use This Skill

  • High-volume application screening
  • Creating screening criteria
  • Building evaluation rubrics
  • Training hiring managers
  • Audit of screening consistency

Methodology Foundation

Based on structured interviewing research and EEOC guidelines, combining:

  • Job-related criteria only
  • Objective scoring rubrics
  • Bias-aware evaluation
  • Documentation requirements

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Creates screening rubricsHiring decisions
Scores against criteriaCulture fit assessment
Identifies red/green flagsInterview invitation
Summarizes qualificationsFinal selection
Flags potential concernsException handling

Instructions

Step 1: Define Job Criteria

Required vs. Preferred:

CategoryMust HaveNice to Have
EducationMinimum degreeAdvanced degree
ExperienceX years in YSpecific industry
SkillsCore technicalAdjacent skills
CertificationsRequired licensesPreferred certs

Scoring Weight:

CriterionWeightRationale
Required experience40%Core capability
Required skills30%Day-one impact
Education15%Foundation
Preferred qualifications15%Growth potential

Step 2: Create Screening Rubric

Scoring Scale:

ScoreDefinition
4Exceeds requirement significantly
3Meets requirement fully
2Partially meets requirement
1Does not meet requirement
0Cannot assess from resume

Step 3: Evaluate Resume

Assessment Framework:

  1. Check must-have requirements (binary pass/fail)
  2. Score each criterion (1-4 scale)
  3. Calculate weighted total
  4. Identify flags (red and green)
  5. Make recommendation

Step 4: Document Findings

For Each Resume:

  • Overall score
  • Must-have checklist
  • Criterion-by-criterion scores
  • Flags and concerns
  • Recommendation with rationale

Step 5: Prioritize Candidates

Priority Matrix:

Score RangeAction
80-100%Priority interview
60-79%Standard review
40-59%Conditional hold
<40%Not qualified

Examples

Example 1: Full Resume Screening

Input:

Job: Senior Product Manager

Requirements:
- 5+ years product management experience
- B2B SaaS background required
- Technical degree or equivalent experience
- Experience with Agile methodologies
- Preferred: MBA or similar

Resume:
Jane Smith
Product Manager at TechCorp (3 years)
- Led product roadmap for B2B analytics platform
- Managed team of 4 designers and engineers
- Increased user retention by 35%

Associate PM at StartupXYZ (2 years)
- B2C mobile app
- Launched 3 major features

Education: BS Computer Science, Stanford
Certifications: CSPO, SAFe Agilist

Output:

## Resume Screening: Jane Smith

### Quick Summary
**Position:** Senior Product Manager
**Candidate:** Jane Smith
**Score:** 78/100 - STANDARD REVIEW

---

### Must-Have Requirements

| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
|-------------|--------|----------|
| 5+ years PM experience | ✅ PASS | 3 + 2 = 5 years total |
| B2B SaaS background | ✅ PASS | TechCorp B2B analytics |
| Technical degree/equivalent | ✅ PASS | BS CS Stanford |
| Agile experience | ✅ PASS | CSPO, SAFe certifications |

**Must-Have Result:** PASS (4/4)

---

### Detailed Scoring

| Criterion | Weight | Score | Weighted | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|----------|-------|
| Years of Experience | 40% | 3/4 | 30/40 | Meets minimum exactly |
| B2B SaaS | 30% | 3/4 | 22.5/30 | 3 years, not full tenure |
| Technical Background | 15% | 4/4 | 15/15 | Stanford CS |
| Preferred (MBA) | 15% | 2/4 | 7.5/15 | Has certs, no MBA |

**Total Score: 75/100**

---

### Green Flags

| Flag | Evidence | Significance |
|------|----------|--------------|
| Quantified impact | "35% retention increase" | Results-oriented |
| Management experience | "Team of 4" | Leadership ready |
| Relevant certifications | CSPO, SAFe | Agile commitment |
| Top-tier education | Stanford CS | Technical foundation |

---

### Yellow Flags

| Flag | Concern | Mitigation |
|------|---------|------------|
| Experience exactly at minimum | Just hits 5 years | Probe depth in interview |
| Mixed B2B/B2C | 2 years in B2C | Understand B2B transition |
| No MBA | Preferred qualification | Certs may compensate |

---

### Red Flags

None identified.

---

### Interview Recommendation

**Decision:** RECOMMEND FOR INTERVIEW

**Rationale:**
- Meets all must-have requirements
- Strong B2B SaaS experience at TechCorp
- Technical background exceeds expectations
- Quantified achievements show impact

**Interview Focus Areas:**
1. Depth of B2B product strategy experience
2. Transition from B2C to B2B context
3. Scale of products managed (ARR, users)
4. Examples of cross-functional leadership

---

### Comparison Notes

Candidate is solid but not exceptional. Meets requirements without
significantly exceeding them. Consider alongside stronger candidates
if available.

Example 2: Batch Screening Summary

Input:

Screen these 5 candidates for Marketing Manager:
Requirements: 3+ years marketing, B2B experience, analytics skills

1. Alice: 5 years B2B marketing, Google Analytics certified
2. Bob: 2 years marketing, B2C only, strong analytics
3. Carol: 4 years, mixed B2B/B2C, basic Excel
4. David: 6 years B2B, owns marketing analytics tool
5. Eve: 3 years B2B, HubSpot certified

Output:

## Batch Screening Summary: Marketing Manager

### Quick Rank

| Rank | Candidate | Score | Recommendation |
|------|-----------|-------|----------------|
| 1 | David | 95% | Priority Interview |
| 2 | Alice | 85% | Priority Interview |
| 3 | Eve | 75% | Standard Review |
| 4 | Carol | 55% | Conditional Hold |
| 5 | Bob | 40% | Not Qualified |

---

### Individual Summaries

#### 1. David (95%) - PRIORITY INTERVIEW

| Requirement | Status | Score |
|-------------|--------|-------|
| 3+ years | ✅ 6 years | 4/4 |
| B2B experience | ✅ Full tenure | 4/4 |
| Analytics skills | ✅ Tool owner | 4/4 |

**Standout:** Exceptional analytics depth - owns a marketing analytics tool
**Interview:** Immediately

---

#### 2. Alice (85%) - PRIORITY INTERVIEW

| Requirement | Status | Score |
|-------------|--------|-------|
| 3+ years | ✅ 5 years | 4/4 |
| B2B experience | ✅ Full tenure | 4/4 |
| Analytics skills | ✅ GA certified | 3/4 |

**Standout:** Solid all-around, Google Analytics certification
**Interview:** This week

---

#### 3. Eve (75%) - STANDARD REVIEW

| Requirement | Status | Score |
|-------------|--------|-------|
| 3+ years | ✅ Exactly 3 | 3/4 |
| B2B experience | ✅ Full tenure | 4/4 |
| Analytics skills | ⚠️ HubSpot only | 2/4 |

**Concern:** HubSpot is automation, not analytics
**Interview:** Probe analytics skills deeper

---

#### 4. Carol (55%) - CONDITIONAL HOLD

| Requirement | Status | Score |
|-------------|--------|-------|
| 3+ years | ✅ 4 years | 3/4 |
| B2B experience | ⚠️ Mixed | 2/4 |
| Analytics skills | ❌ Basic Excel | 1/4 |

**Concern:** Weak analytics foundation
**Hold:** Consider if top candidates decline

---

#### 5. Bob (40%) - NOT QUALIFIED

| Requirement | Status | Score |
|-------------|--------|-------|
| 3+ years | ❌ 2 years | 1/4 |
| B2B experience | ❌ B2C only | 1/4 |
| Analytics skills | ✅ Strong | 3/4 |

**Disqualified:** Does not meet experience or B2B requirements
**Action:** Reject with positive note on analytics skills

---

### Screening Actions

| Action | Candidates |
|--------|------------|
| Schedule interviews | David, Alice |
| Standard queue | Eve |
| Hold file | Carol |
| Rejection email | Bob |

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Structuring evaluation criteria
  • Consistent scoring application
  • Identifying relevant flags
  • Documenting decisions

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Assess culture fit
  • Verify claims accuracy
  • Conduct background checks
  • Replace human judgment

Important Compliance Notes

  • Focus only on job-related criteria
  • Avoid protected class considerations
  • Document all decisions
  • Apply criteria consistently

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts:

  • "Create interview questions based on this screening"
  • "What should I probe further with [candidate]?"
  • "Compare these top 3 candidates side by side"
  • "Draft rejection email for [candidate]"

References

  • SHRM Structured Interviewing Guidelines
  • EEOC Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection
  • Google re:Work Hiring Practices
  • Lever Recruiting Best Practices

Related Skills

  • interview-scheduler - Coordinate interviews
  • onboarding-guide - Post-hire integration
  • job-description-writer - Create requirements

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: HR Operations
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 10-15 min per resume
  • Prerequisites: Job requirements, resumes

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Measure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026년 10월 1일 업데이트

Calculate A/B test statistical significance. Use when: determining if test results are significant; calculating required sample size; estimating test duration; analyzing conversion experiments; making data-driven decisions

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026년 10월 1일 업데이트

Assess customer account health using product usage, support sentiment, payment status, and relationship signals

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026년 10월 1일 업데이트

Analyze paid advertising performance across channels and recommend budget reallocation to maximize ROAS and minimize CAC. Use when: planning quarterly ad budget allocation, diagnosing underperforming ad channels, deciding whether to scale spend on a channel, calculating marginal ROI across Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or TikTok, rebalancing media mix after performance shifts, or setting up a test-and-scale framework for new channels.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026년 10월 1일 업데이트

Use when testing skills, commands, or agents for quality. Use after creating new skills, before deploying agents, or when debugging inconsistent agent behavior. Triggers on "evaluate", "test quality", "is this skill working", or QA of AI workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026년 10월 1일 업데이트

Use when analyzing server logs to understand how AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) interact with your site. Use when optimizing content placement for LLM retrieval, diagnosing why AI search isn't citing your content, or auditing crawl patterns to find optimization gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026년 10월 1일 업데이트

guia-matthieu의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고