Plan decisions where improving one goal can harm another. Identify competing priorities, set the current emphasis and minimum acceptable levels, check effects across the whole plan, and define signals that call for rebalancing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
统筹兼顾：当多个目标、指标或利益方相互制约、优化一项会伤害另一项时，识别全部辩证关系对，检查片面性，为每对关系定出当前阶段的侧重与底线，评估系统性影响，并设失衡预警。触发信号包括 trade-off、目标冲突、速度 vs 质量、短期 vs 长期、"顾此失彼"；只有单一目标、用户已定取舍、或属硬性二选一时不触发。
English: Overall planning. When several goals, metrics, or stakeholders constrain each other and optimizing one harms another, map every dialectical pair, check for one-sidedness, set the current emphasis and floor for each pair, assess system-wide effects, and define imbalance alarms. Triggers include trade-offs, goal conflicts, speed vs quality, short vs long term; skip for single-goal work, decisions the user already made, or hard either/or constraints.
설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
"把国内外一切积极因素调动起来。" —— 《论十大关系》
平衡不是"各方都少一点"的和稀泥，而是让各方面都发挥作用的配置；平衡点随条件变化而动。
用：
不用：
concentrate-forcescontradiction-analysis 定性后取舍辩证关系：
1. [A] ↔ [B]：目前偏向 [A / B / 均衡]，程度 [轻微 / 明显 / 严重]，属 [刻意取舍 / 无意忽略]
2. ……
平衡方案：
[A] vs [B]：当前阶段优先 [A]，但 [B] 不低于 ……；原因 ……
系统影响：加强 [A] → 对 [C]↔[D]：加剧 / 缓解 / 无影响，需 ……
失衡预警：若出现 ……，说明 [A]↔[B] 失衡，重新调用本 skill
contradiction-analysisconcentrate-forces 执行原著依据：original-texts.md
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Guide an agent to ground judgments in evidence, separate facts from inferences and unknowns, verify results, and diagnose failures. It also selects a suitable methodology skill when investigation, prioritization, validation, or another structured approach would help.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Organize competing tasks by impact, difficulty, and dependencies, then choose one main priority. State what completion looks like, keep unrelated requests queued, and finish and verify the chosen task before reassessing the remaining work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Break down a complex problem into opposing needs, identify the central conflict and its dominant side, then choose a response. The analysis also highlights changing priorities and tensions that need monitoring as work progresses.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review completed work and its process against the original goals and acceptance criteria. Identify specific problems, root causes, and actionable fixes, while checking external criticism against evidence and correcting valid issues.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Investigate firsthand sources before making a judgment or recommendation. Separate verified facts, reasoned inferences, and unknowns, document their sources, and produce a conclusion that explains the current situation, constraints, and remaining uncertainty.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Combine feedback from users, code, logs, and runtime results into a reasoned plan. Separate agreement from conflicting evidence, explain the judgment, and validate it with the people or systems that supplied the original information.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.