Design rigorous A/B tests with hypotheses, variants, metrics, and sample size calculations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Establish durable brand and voice context for cross-skill consumption. Generates BRAND.md (audience, positioning, do/don't editorial rules, taboo phrases, competitor differentiation) and VOICE.md (existing persona JSON re-expressed as readable prose), both written to the project root. When present, all blog sub-skills auto-load these files before writing or reviewing. Pairs with blog-persona, which manages the structured persona JSON. Use when user says "blog brand", "create brand context", "brand voice doc", "BRAND.md", "VOICE.md", "establish editorial brand", "brand guidelines for blog".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Generates two project-root files that every blog sub-skill auto-loads when present:
BRAND.md: who the audience is, what the brand stands for, what to never sayVOICE.md: how the brand sounds, structurally and lexicallyThese provide persistent editorial context that survives across sessions and propagates to every command.
Today, persona JSON (from blog-persona) is loaded by some skills and not others. Topic-cluster context lives inside cluster vaults. Competitor positioning lives nowhere. Each blog command re-derives "what is the brand" from whatever context it has.
BRAND.md and VOICE.md fix this: one canonical source, loaded by the blog orchestrator at the start of every command.
When neither file exists, behavior is unchanged. Backward compatible.
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
/blog brand init | Interactive interview, writes BRAND.md and VOICE.md to project root |
/blog brand show | Display current contents (or report missing) |
/blog brand update | Re-run the interview with current values as defaults |
Run the 5-step interactive interview. Ask each step, wait for response, then proceed. If blog-persona JSON already exists, pre-fill voice answers from it.
Ask:
Ask:
Ask:
Ask:
Ask:
Write to project root as:
# Brand Context
> This file is auto-loaded by all blog sub-skills. Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD.
## Audience
- **Primary**: [role + context]
- **Secondary**: [if any]
- **Expertise**: [level]
- **Active problems**:
- [problem 1]
- [problem 2]
- [problem 3]
- **Common misconceptions**:
- [misconception 1]
- [misconception 2]
## Positioning
- **Mission**: [one sentence]
- **Distinctive POV**: [contrarian or non-obvious belief]
- **What we are NOT**: [anti-positioning]
- **Competitors**:
- [Competitor A]: [our one-line differentiator]
- [Competitor B]: [our one-line differentiator]
- [Competitor C]: [our one-line differentiator]
## Editorial Rules
### Always do
- [rule 1]
- [rule 2]
- [rule 3]
### Never do
- [rule 1]
- [rule 2]
- [rule 3]
### Taboo phrases
- [phrase 1]
- [phrase 2]
### Required disclosures
- [disclosure rule]
## Topic Scope
- **In scope**: [pillars]
- **Partial scope**: [adjacent topics]
- **Out of scope**: [topics to refuse]
- **Recurring formats**: [if any]
Write to project root as:
# Voice Context
> This file is auto-loaded by all blog sub-skills. Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD.
## Pronoun stance
[first-person / second-person / third-person / mixed]
## Lexical rules
- **Contractions**: [full / partial / none]
- **Sentence ceiling**: [N words max]
- **Paragraph ceiling**: [N words max, default 150]
- **Summary label**: [Key Takeaways / TL;DR / etc.]
## Headline patterns
- **Favor**: [list]
- **Avoid**: [list]
## Voice fingerprint (from blog-persona)
- Funny vs serious: [0.0 to 1.0]
- Formal vs casual: [0.0 to 1.0]
- Respectful vs irreverent: [0.0 to 1.0]
- Enthusiastic vs matter-of-fact: [0.0 to 1.0]
## Readability target
- Audience tier: [consumer / professional / technical]
- Flesch Grade: [range]
- Flesch Ease: [range]
## Reference samples
- [URL 1] (extracted patterns: [summary])
- [URL 2] (extracted patterns: [summary])
BRAND.md and VOICE.md at project root./blog brand init.Same as Init, but pre-fills every answer with the current value. The user can press enter to accept or type a new value. After collecting all answers, overwrite both files with the new contents and update the Last updated: line.
When /blog write, /blog rewrite, /blog brief, /blog outline, /blog calendar, or /blog strategy runs, the orchestrator (skills/blog/SKILL.md) checks for BRAND.md and VOICE.md at the project root. If present, the contents are injected into the system prompt for downstream agents (blog-researcher, blog-writer, blog-seo, blog-reviewer).
If absent, behavior is unchanged. The orchestrator does not prompt the user to create them; they are opt-in context.
| Concern | blog-persona | blog-brand |
|---|---|---|
| Structured persona JSON for programmatic use | Yes | No |
| Readable brand context for cross-skill prompts | No | Yes |
| Audience and positioning | No | Yes |
| Taboo phrases and editorial don'ts | Partial (don't list) | Full (taboo + disclosures + scope) |
| Competitor differentiation | No | Yes |
| Topic boundaries | No | Yes |
| Voice fingerprint (tone sliders) | Yes (canonical) | Mirror (read-only) |
blog-brand does not replace blog-persona; it consumes it. The persona JSON remains the source of truth for tone dimensions, sentence-length distribution, and contraction frequency. VOICE.md mirrors the readable parts so prompts are self-contained.
If no persona exists when /blog brand init runs, the voice questions still produce a VOICE.md. Users who want programmatic enforcement can run /blog persona create after.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Design rigorous A/B tests with hypotheses, variants, metrics, and sample size calculations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Format CVs for academic positions with publications, grants, and teaching
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct a comprehensive accessibility audit against WCAG guidelines with severity ratings and remediation steps.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create accessibility testing plans covering assistive technologies and WCAG criteria.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform. Also use when the user mentions 'ad copy variations,' 'ad creative,' 'generate headlines,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'ad iterations,' 'creative testing,' 'ad performance optimization,' 'write me some ads,' 'Facebook ad copy,' 'Google ad headlines,' 'LinkedIn ad text,' or 'I need more ad variations.' Use this whenever someone needs to produce ad copy at scale or iterate on existing ads. For campaign strategy and targeting, see ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.