IntelliJ `AnAction` 클래스를 구현하거나 수정하고 `plugin.xml`에 등록하도록 안내합니다. 표시 이름과 설명은 메시지 번들에 두고, 필요하면 아이콘을 설정하며, 이벤트 코루틴 범위에서 중단 함수를 실행해 동기식 처리로 IDE가 멈추는 일을 방지합니다.
- IDE 메뉴에 새 동작 추가
- 동작 등록이나 아이콘 변경
- 동작 이름과 설명 정리
JetBrains IDE의 언어나 프레임워크 통합에 PolySymbols를 추가하는 방법을 안내합니다. 심볼을 코드 완성, 참조 해결, 사용처 검색, 문서, 이름 변경에 연결하고 기존 PSI 처리와의 공존을 다룹니다.
Implement PolySymbols completion, references, and rename.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기JetBrains IDE의 언어나 프레임워크 통합에 PolySymbols를 연결하는 방법을 안내합니다. 심볼 정의를 코드 완성, 참조 해결, 사용처 검색, 문서, 탐색, 이름 변경 기능에 연결하는 절차를 설명합니다. 범위 등록, 참조 및 선언 제공자 구현, 코드 완성 연결도 다룹니다. 심볼 종류와 데이터는 구체 구현 클래스로 변환해 읽는 대신 공통 속성을 통해 다루도록 안내합니다.
새 언어나 프레임워크 플러그인에 PolySymbols 지원을 추가할 때 유용합니다. 기존 PSI 기반 코드 완성과 참조 처리와 어떻게 함께 사용할지 검토할 때도 활용할 수 있습니다. 기존 통합 사례를 바탕으로 어떤 기능을 PolySymbols에 맡길지, 겹치는 처리를 어떻게 다룰지 정리할 수 있습니다.
PolySymbols는 실험적 기능으로 설명되어 있습니다. 구체적인 변경에 대해 사용자가 명시적으로 허가하지 않으면 공유 PolySymbols 플랫폼 소스를 수정하지 않습니다.
이 소개문은 공개된 SKILL.md를 바탕으로 AI(OpenAI Codex)가 작성했습니다. 정확한 사양은 아래 원문을 확인하세요.
AI가 SKILL.md의 내용에서 주의가 필요한 작업과 도입 전제를 확인했습니다. 점수는 실제로 실행한 결과(실행 검증)만으로 매깁니다.
점수에는 넣지 않았습니다. 2026년 10월 28일 기준으로 AI(OpenAI Codex)가 판정했습니다. 참고용이므로 설치 전에 원문도 확인해 주세요.
설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
PolySymbols is a framework built on top of the platform's Symbol API
(PolySymbol : Symbol) for sharing symbol definitions and code-insight features (completion,
references, documentation, navigation, rename, find-usages, semantic highlighting) across
languages and frameworks. It was called "Web Symbols" in 2022.3–2025.1 and is still marked
experimental. Core modules: community/platform/polySymbols/ (shared, backend, web).
Never edit anything under community/platform/polySymbols/** without the user's explicit,
one-time permission for that specific change — not even a small, purely-additive generalization
that looks obviously safe. This is shared framework code consumed by every PolySymbols integration
in the repo (Angular, Vue, CSS, JS, GDScript, mermaid, etc.); a "safe-looking" generalization made to
fix one integration's test can silently change behavior for all the others. If you hit a real gap or
limitation in platform behavior while integrating a language/framework, the default response is to
report it and ask, not to patch the platform — the right fix is almost always something owned by
your own plugin (a plugin-registered EP implementation, e.g. its own UsageSearcher/
RenameUsageSearcher/CustomUsageSearcher, not a platform-file edit). This was learned the hard way:
a session generalized PolySymbolUsageSearcher's PsiLinkedPolySymbol-only raw-PSI-reference bridge
to also cover PolySymbolDeclaredInPsi, when the actual, documented platform design is that
PolySymbolDeclaredInPsi intentionally does not provide that bridge (see
references/query-model.md) — the fix should have stopped
at "ask the user," not at "patch the framework."
Implementing a new integration typically means: build declaration/reference/completion providers
on the platform side as usual, plus a handful of PolySymbols contributor classes — find-usages,
documentation, and rename then work automatically through reference resolution to a PolySymbol.
Code that consumes PolySymbols (annotators, inspections, completion/line-marker/parameter-info
providers — and a language integration's own customizers/scopes, not just downstream callers)
should never cast a PolySymbol to a concrete implementation class to detect its kind or read its
data. This is explicitly documented in PolySymbol.kt's own "## Properties" doc comment ("when you
get results from a PolySymbolQueryExecutor query, you should avoid casting symbols to specialized
interfaces... a query may return symbols of unexpected classes contributed by some 3rd party
plugins") — it is a platform convention every consumer is expected to follow, not a one-off rule:
kind property (symbol.kind == SomeKind), which is always
available on the plain PolySymbol interface. Never is ConcreteLeafSymbolClass.kind) → define a PolySymbolProperty<T> object and annotate the concrete class's real member
with @PolySymbol.Property(TheProperty::class), then read it via symbol[TheProperty] (the
PolySymbol.get operator) — never (symbol as? ConcreteLeafSymbolClass)?.someMember.PolySymbol.xxx extension, so consumer call sites read
symbol.xxx and never see the property object or a cast at all — mirror
plugins/JavaScriptLanguage/web-platform/src/com/intellij/polySymbols/js/JSSymbolUtils.kt's
PolySymbol.jsType/jsKind/toPropertySignature, the reference example cited in PolySymbol.kt
itself. Note toPropertySignature's fallback branch (when the property is absent) builds its
result purely from other plain PolySymbol members (name, modifiers, jsType) — it never
casts, not even as a fallback.GdClassSymbol, exposing directMemberScope/resolveSuperClassSymbol() identically
from both PSI- and SDK-backed class symbols) is not what this rule targets — that's legitimate
polymorphic dispatch within a framework's own resolution machinery, not "cast down to read hidden,
kind/backing-specific data" in consumer code. The anti-pattern is casting to a leaf class
(GdPsiMethodSymbol, GdSdkClassSymbol) or a backing-specific base (GdPsiPolySymbol vs.
GdSdkPolySymbol) from outside the symbol-definition package.@PolySymbol.Property-annotated member declared once on
a shared abstract base class is found by every subclass automatically — PolySymbolPropertyGetter
walks superclasses/interfaces when building its per-concrete-class accessor map, and Java/Kotlin
generate a bridge method (matching the base class's erased signature) for any subclass override
with a covariant return type, which is exactly what Method.invoke() resolves against. So you
don't need to repeat the annotation on every leaf subclass when the member is inherited unchanged.| Interface / class | Purpose |
|---|---|
PolySymbol | Core element — kind (namespace + kindName) + name, plus optional icon/priority/modifiers/apiStatus/pattern |
PolySymbolScope | A symbol that contains other symbols (an HTML element containing attributes, a JS class containing members) |
PolySymbolQueryExecutor / Factory | Runs nameMatchQuery/listSymbolsQuery/codeCompletionQuery against contributed scopes |
PolySymbolQueryScopeContributor | Registers PolySymbolScopes for a PSI location — the main extension point you implement |
PolySymbolQueryConfigurator | Supplies PolyContext rules + symbol name-conversion rules |
PsiPolySymbolReferenceProvider | Resolves a host PsiElement to a referenced PolySymbol — registered via EP, produces external references |
PolySymbolOwnReferences | Alternative to PsiPolySymbolReferenceProvider: builds references to return from PsiElement.getOwnReferences() directly — a language's own canonical resolve, not EP-registered. Requires the host element to implement the PolySymbolOwnReferenceHost marker interface |
PolySymbolDeclarationProvider | Supplies PolySymbolDeclarations for a PsiElement (skip if PsiLinkedPolySymbol covers your case) |
PolySymbolsCompletionProviderBase | Base class for a CompletionProvider that runs a codeCompletionQuery |
PolySymbolWithPattern | A symbol expanded via a microsyntax pattern into a PolySymbolMatch |
PsiLinkedPolySymbol | A symbol backed 1:1 by a real PsiElement — gets declarations/navigation/find-usages "for free" |
ReferencingPolySymbol | Utility: makes one symbol kind stand in for/alias another kind |
PolyContext | Gates scopes/configurators here, but is a general-purpose, performance-optimized context API usable well beyond PolySymbols — see poly-context |
| Web Types | Static JSON symbol definitions — see references/web-types.md |
See references/query-model.md for the full query/scope/declaration/ reference/completion wiring, and references/patterns.md for the pattern DSL and microsyntax matching.
Every real integration studied in this repo keeps legacy PSI-based reference/completion code running alongside PolySymbols — none resolve entirely through it. This is not a migration artifact you can ignore; it is the load-bearing design fact for anyone adding a new integration. See references/case-studies.md for full detail, but the pattern repeats everywhere:
XmlElementDescriptorProvider, css.elementDescriptorProvider,
JSReferenceExpression.resolve()) and explicitly steps aside for standard/spec symbols —
e.g. HtmlElementSymbolDescriptorsProvider.getElementDescriptor() returns null when the query
result hasOnlyStandardHtmlSymbols(), deferring to the bundled RelaxNG HTML5 schema; the legacy
CssElementDescriptorProviderImpl is kept registered with order="last" as the CSS fallback;
TypeScriptReferenceExpressionResolver only consults PolySymbols for unqualified references
inside injected/embedded expression hosts. Standard tag/attribute/property lists are not
Web Types data — they're the pre-existing RelaxNG schema and webref CSS XML.<style src>/ref=/file-path references, and CSS v-bind()
bindings (Vue), and the Angular2 expression-language layer, templateUrl/pipe-name references
(Angular) all still run through plain PsiReferenceContributor/CompletionContributor code with
no PolySymbols involvement at all.dotnet/Plugins/godot-support/gdscript/.../polySymbols/README.md) states the PSI
and PolySymbols implementations both run today and produce duplicate Find Usages results
until the legacy path is deleted. Local variables, parameters, for-loop bindings, resource-path
references, and the entire TSCN language have no PolySymbols coverage yet.Actionable takeaway: for every new integration or feature, decide explicitly whether
PolySymbols is the resolution path of record for that PSI element/feature, or merely a
supplementary layer contributing extra symbols on top of an existing mechanism. If a legacy
PsiReferenceContributor/CompletionContributor and a new PolySymbols registration can both fire
on the same host PsiElement, either gate one off (a feature flag, a context check, an early
return null/empty-list from whichever should defer) or accept and document the overlap — don't
assume the platform will pick one for you.
polySymbols.enableInLanguage language="..." (EP
com.intellij.polySymbols.enableInLanguage) so PsiExternalReferenceHosts in that language are
eligible for PolySymbols reference resolution at all.PolySymbolQueryScopeContributor
(EP com.intellij.polySymbols.queryScopeContributor) — map PSI locations to PolySymbolScopes
via the registrar DSL. This is almost always the first and most important class you write.
Details: references/query-model.md.PsiPolySymbolReferenceProvider per host PsiElement type
(EP com.intellij.polySymbols.psiReferenceProvider, one registration per hostElementClass).
Alternative: implement PsiElement.getOwnReferences() directly via the PolySymbolOwnReferences
builder when PolySymbols should be the language's own canonical resolve rather than an
EP-contributed layer (e.g. replacing a legacy PsiReferenceContributor) — see
references/query-model.md.
Don't register both for the same host — own references pre-empt external ones. Either way, the
host element's own type must implement PsiExternalReferenceHost (external) or
PolySymbolOwnReferenceHost (own) — PolySymbolHighlightingAnnotator only looks at elements
implementing one of the two, so skipping this isn't just a missed nicety, it's silently no
highlighting/diagnostics at all (own references also won't compile against the DSL without it).PsiElement and lives purely in the
PolySymbols model, implement PolySymbolDeclaredInPsi plus a PolySymbolDeclarationProvider
(EP com.intellij.polySymbols.declarationProvider) that builds the symbol — this is the default.
The provider is pure dispatch: decide which symbol(s) a PsiElement backs, instantiate them,
and return symbol.declaration (the interface's own default). Don't hand-roll a
PolySymbolDeclaration implementation or thread a range through the provider — a non-default
declaration range is a textRangeInSourceElement override on the symbol class itself; the symbol
represents itself, the provider only knows which symbol to build.
Reach for PsiLinkedPolySymbol + polySymbols.psiLinkedSymbol host="..." only when that same
PsiElement must also keep working as a target for a legacy, non-PolySymbols
find-usages/rename mechanism you're running alongside (a bridge for partial migrations, not a
general shortcut — see references/query-model.md).
For symbols with no backing PsiElement at all (synthetic/SDK symbols), write a
PolySymbolDeclarationProvider by hand.completion.contributor whose provider extends
PolySymbolsCompletionProviderBase and calls queryExecutor.codeCompletionQuery(...).PolySymbolQueryConfigurator for context rules/name-conversion rules;
PolySymbolQueryResultsCustomizerFactory to post-filter/remap query results;
polySymbols.webTypes if standard-library symbols can be shipped as static JSON instead of code
(see references/web-types.md); a PolySymbolFramework
(polySymbols.framework) + PolyContextProvider (polySymbols.context) if you're introducing a
new framework identity (see poly-context).PolySymbolWithPattern/the pattern DSL when the language/framework layers a microsyntax on
top of base syntax (directive-style attribute names, event-modifier chains). See
references/patterns.md.Four real integrations in this repo, each ending in an explicit PolySymbols-vs-legacy verdict — read references/case-studies.md for the full writeup with file:line evidence.
| Integration | Where | One-line verdict |
|---|---|---|
| GDScript | dotnet/Plugins/godot-support/gdscript/.../polySymbols/ | Dual-track: SDK/engine symbols are PolySymbols-first; user-code locals, resource refs, and TSCN are legacy-only, both paths run concurrently on some elements |
| JS/TS, HTML, CSS | plugins/JavaScriptLanguage/web-platform/, community/xml, plugins/css | PolySymbols is grafted onto legacy extension points and steps aside for anything standard/spec-defined |
| Vue | contrib/vuejs/vuejs-backend/src/org/jetbrains/vuejs/web/ | Template/markup surface (components/directives/props/slots/events) is ~fully PolySymbols; Vuex, refs, CSS bindings are not |
| Angular | contrib/Angular/angular-backend/src/org/angular2/web/ | Markup/selector surface is ~fully PolySymbols; the Angular2 expression-language layer and some file/pipe-name refs are not |
Symbol foundation this framework builds on.Load only when needed:
PolySymbolMatch/name segments, ReferencingPolySymbol, the Vue directive worked example.PolySymbolsTestCase hierarchy, the PolySymbolsTestUtil.kt cheat sheet, feature-by-feature recipes.CodeInsightTestFixture methods, the per-kind production migration unit.아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
IntelliJ `AnAction` 클래스를 구현하거나 수정하고 `plugin.xml`에 등록하도록 안내합니다. 표시 이름과 설명은 메시지 번들에 두고, 필요하면 아이콘을 설정하며, 이벤트 코루틴 범위에서 중단 함수를 실행해 동기식 처리로 IDE가 멈추는 일을 방지합니다.
IntelliJ JPS 테스트 모듈을 Bazel로 옮기고 Bazel에서만 발생하는 실패를 조사하는 안내서입니다. 의존성, 플러그인, 테스트 데이터와 runfiles 문제를 확인하고 생성된 대상과 이전된 테스트를 검증합니다.
IntelliJ 프로젝트 규칙에 맞춰 Kotlin과 Java 코드를 작성하거나 검토합니다. 언어 선택, 서식, 봉인 타입, 스레드 주석, 제어 흐름 예외 처리를 확인합니다.
이 가이드는 IntelliJ 프로젝트의 변경 사항을 목적별로 나누고 프로젝트 형식에 맞는 커밋 메시지를 작성하도록 돕습니다. 티켓이 있으면 번호와 변경 설명을, 없으면 레이블과 하위 시스템명을 사용하며 필요에 따라 이유와 판단을 본문에 담습니다.
여러 Python 타입 검사기로 코드 조각이나 파일의 타입 추론과 오류 판정을 비교합니다. 도구별 결과, 실행 시간, 진단 내용을 Markdown 보고서로 모아 저장할 수 있습니다.
Compose Desktop 화면을 구성할 때 컴포저블은 렌더링을 맡고 프레젠터나 코디네이터는 앱 결정을 맡도록 구조를 정리합니다. 상태 소유권, Effect, 재사용 컴포넌트 API, 지연 목록 키, 애니메이션과 성능을 개별 UI 변경에 맞춰 살펴봅니다.