Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a repeatable task must become a bounded Trigger -> Execute -> Verify -> State loop, scheduled automation, goal agent, or metric-driven research cycle.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
<skill_contract> <input>A repeatable task with inspectable state, finite budgets, permissions, and an independent verifier.</input> <output>A validated Trigger -> Execute -> Verify -> State contract plus resumable run receipts.</output> <done>The declared metric or stop condition is supported by fresh validator and verifier evidence.</done> <non_goals>Dependency-graph orchestration, unbounded autonomy, or self-certified completion.</non_goals>
Build loops only when repeated execution creates evidence. Every loop needs admission, a validated contract, durable state, independent evaluation, bounded retries, stop/recovery rules, and a final receipt.
Provide: objective, trigger, scope/non-goals, inputs, state/artifact paths, metric, verifier, permissions, budgets, stop condition, recovery, and write-back. See references/ci-repair-loop-example.md for a worked contract.
Select one mode:
Admit only if work is repeatable, outputs are inspectable, a verifier exists, failures are recoverable, and autonomy is worth the orchestration/review cost. Otherwise use a one-shot workflow.
Use graph-engineering instead when explicit data dependencies, independent
branches, typed joins, or node-local recovery create measurable value. A Graph
node may use this Loop contract for local repetition; Graph width does not
replace finite Loop depth.
<unknowns_gate>
Classify unknowns as known, probeable, testable, or blocked. Missing objective, verifier, permission boundary, budget, or recovery is NEEDS_INPUT; do not infer these controls from intent. Unknown implementation details may be resolved inside the loop only when the probe is bounded and reversible.
</unknowns_gate>
<execute>Write this contract before acting:
Objective: Mode: Goal | Loop | Automation | AutoResearch
Trigger: Scope: Non-goals:
Owner: Inputs:
Artifacts path: State path: Work clock:
Success metric: Evidence: Verifier:
Topology: single-agent | maker-checker | manager-workers
Max iterations: Time limit: Budget:
Review budget: Stop condition:
Write-back: Permission boundary: Recovery:
Validate it with scripts/validate_loop_contract.py --strict. Then iterate:
Normalize the model/runtime termination signal after every action. complete
still requires the declared verifier; tool_request returns proposed arguments
to the host permission gate; checkpoint/truncation persists state before any
continuation; refusal, error, or unknown escalates. Never infer completion from
fluent prose or from the word "stop" alone.
For maintenance and queue loops, declare an allowed NO_OP outcome and its
eligibility query. A quiet iteration is successful only when the query proves
there was no eligible work, output count is within policy, and no side effect
occurred.
Use single-agent by default, maker-checker for ambiguous/high-risk evaluation, and manager-workers only for genuinely independent work with an explicit integration gate.
If a validated Graph owns the dependency topology, this skill owns only the
bounded retry behavior inside its declared loop nodes.
The verifier must test the declared result rather than reward activity. Check evidence freshness, metric movement, guardrails, scope, and state replay. For external or consequential actions, require approval and verified rollback before crossing the boundary.
</evaluate><retry_policy>
max_attempts equals the contract's finite max iterations. Retry only after a named diagnosis and a changed input, tool, scope, or strategy. Stop on the same failure signature twice, metric regression, exhausted review budget, or NO_PROGRESS.
</retry_policy>
<state_contract>
Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus contract version, trigger receipt, hypothesis, action, normalized termination reason, artifact/diff, metric/guardrail delta, permissions, output count, no-op receipt, work clock, and recovery point. Append iterations; write current state atomically.
</state_contract>
NEEDS_INPUT: a mandatory contract field is absent; do not start.BLOCKED_PERMISSION: the next action crosses authority; checkpoint and request approval.VERIFY_FAILED: result or guardrail fails; rollback/regroup before another attempt.NO_PROGRESS: the same signature repeats or the metric is unchanged after a changed attempt.BUDGET_STOP: any iteration, time, tool, cost, or review cap fires. max_attempts is always finite.Return status, result (metric/end-state decision), evidence (validator and iteration receipts), unknowns, and next_action (stop, retry, approval, recovery, or handoff).
BUDGET_STOP or resume from state; do not label truncation success.NO_OP only after the declared query
and side-effect check pass.VERIFY_FAILED; never optimize the headline metric alone.</skill_contract>
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.