Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when projects or tasks need explicit state, WIP control, ownership, definitions of done, blocker handling, and verified closure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
<skill_contract> <input>Project objective, tasks, owners, dependencies, budgets, artifacts, current states, and definitions of done.</input> <output>A WIP-limited project state with ranked work, explicit blockers, bounded actions, and verified closure receipts.</output> <done>Every active item has one owner and observable artifact, and completion is backed by its named fresh verification.</done> <non_goals>Hidden WIP, duplicate ownership, status by intuition, backlog accumulation, or completion without evidence.</non_goals>
Maintain a small, inspectable project state machine: BACKLOG -> ACTIVE -> BLOCKED | COMPLETED. Optimize flow and verified outcomes, not task volume.
Provide: project objective, current tasks, owners, dependencies, time budget, artifacts, and definition of done. Optional: prior review receipts.
Normalize each item into {id, objective, owner, state, artifact, definition_of_done, budget, dependencies}. Reject duplicate ownership and distinguish waiting from active execution.
<unknowns_gate>
If an active item lacks an owner, artifact, or observable definition of done, return NEEDS_INPUT. Probe the ambiguity with the largest impact on scheduling; do not guess priority from wording alone.
</unknowns_gate>
<execute>ACTIVE to one or two items per owner.COMPLETED only with a fresh receipt; otherwise keep ACTIVE or BLOCKED.Check state-transition legality, WIP limits, ownership, artifact existence, and completion evidence. Use an independent check for consequential deliverables. If verification fails, reopen the item with the failure evidence and smallest corrective action.
</evaluate><state_contract>
Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus project objective, task ledger, dependency map, WIP count, transition history, and receipts. Transitions are append-only events; current state is derived from the latest valid event.
</state_contract>
NEEDS_INPUT: ownership, priority boundary, or definition of done is missing.BLOCKED_DEPENDENCY: execution cannot continue; preserve the blocker contract and review time.VERIFY_FAILED: the artifact fails its named check; reopen rather than relabel completion.NO_PROGRESS: two reviews produce no new evidence; reduce scope, change strategy, or escalate.BUDGET_STOP: stop active work, persist state, and report the highest-value next action.Return status, result (project board and transition decisions), evidence (artifacts and receipts), unknowns, and next_action with owner and review time.
</skill_contract>
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.