본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

project-flow-ops

Use when projects or tasks need explicit state, WIP control, ownership, definitions of done, blocker handling, and verified closure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills스타 141(GitHub 141 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Project Flow Ops

<skill_contract> <input>Project objective, tasks, owners, dependencies, budgets, artifacts, current states, and definitions of done.</input> <output>A WIP-limited project state with ranked work, explicit blockers, bounded actions, and verified closure receipts.</output> <done>Every active item has one owner and observable artifact, and completion is backed by its named fresh verification.</done> <non_goals>Hidden WIP, duplicate ownership, status by intuition, backlog accumulation, or completion without evidence.</non_goals>

Maintain a small, inspectable project state machine: BACKLOG -> ACTIVE -> BLOCKED | COMPLETED. Optimize flow and verified outcomes, not task volume.

Usage Template

Provide: project objective, current tasks, owners, dependencies, time budget, artifacts, and definition of done. Optional: prior review receipts.

Workflow

<intake>

Normalize each item into {id, objective, owner, state, artifact, definition_of_done, budget, dependencies}. Reject duplicate ownership and distinguish waiting from active execution.

</intake>

<unknowns_gate>

If an active item lacks an owner, artifact, or observable definition of done, return NEEDS_INPUT. Probe the ambiguity with the largest impact on scheduling; do not guess priority from wording alone.

</unknowns_gate>

<execute>
  1. Rank work by objective impact, urgency, dependency leverage, and cost of delay.
  2. Limit ACTIVE to one or two items per owner.
  3. Decompose the selected item until one bounded action can produce a reviewable artifact.
  4. For a blocker, record owner, missing condition, evidence, next probe, and review time; move independent work forward.
  5. Run the verification named in the definition of done.
  6. Move to COMPLETED only with a fresh receipt; otherwise keep ACTIVE or BLOCKED.
  7. At review, remove stale backlog items and state the next constraint.
</execute> <evaluate>

Check state-transition legality, WIP limits, ownership, artifact existence, and completion evidence. Use an independent check for consequential deliverables. If verification fails, reopen the item with the failure evidence and smallest corrective action.

</evaluate>

<state_contract>

Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus project objective, task ledger, dependency map, WIP count, transition history, and receipts. Transitions are append-only events; current state is derived from the latest valid event.

</state_contract>

Failure Protocol

  • NEEDS_INPUT: ownership, priority boundary, or definition of done is missing.
  • BLOCKED_DEPENDENCY: execution cannot continue; preserve the blocker contract and review time.
  • VERIFY_FAILED: the artifact fails its named check; reopen rather than relabel completion.
  • NO_PROGRESS: two reviews produce no new evidence; reduce scope, change strategy, or escalate.
  • BUDGET_STOP: stop active work, persist state, and report the highest-value next action.

Output Contract

Return status, result (project board and transition decisions), evidence (artifacts and receipts), unknowns, and next_action with owner and review time.

Edge Cases

  • Everything is marked urgent: use cost of delay and dependency leverage, then force one explicit tradeoff.
  • A task is 90% complete but verification is unavailable: keep it active or blocked; never infer the final 10%.

Success Metrics

  • Active WIP remains within the declared limit.
  • Every completed task has an artifact and fresh verification receipt.
  • Blocked work names an owner, next probe, and review time.

Quality Gates

  • Every active task has one owner and bounded budget.
  • State transitions are legal and traceable.
  • Completion evidence is fresh and objective.
  • The next constraint is explicit after each review.

</skill_contract>

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026년 9월 19일 업데이트

Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026년 9월 19일 업데이트

Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026년 9월 19일 업데이트

Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026년 9월 19일 업데이트

Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026년 9월 19일 업데이트

Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026년 9월 19일 업데이트

Mark393295827의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고