본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

level

Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(8)

  • SKILL.md7.4 KB
  • references/ascii-card.py3.0 KB
  • references/benchmark.md4.1 KB
  • references/build-steps.md2.8 KB
  • references/dashboard-template.html11.7 KB
  • references/levels.md6.9 KB
  • references/quiz.md4.8 KB
  • references/roadmaps.md9.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

level — the 10 levels of Claude Code

Most people using Claude Code have no idea how much of it they're actually using. This skill scores you 0-10 on a ladder calibrated to the 4 systems this quickstart teaches — Context · Skills · Integrations · Orchestration — benchmarked against a fully-built setup + the latest Anthropic features, then hands you a focused roadmap and a shareable card.

It's the quickstart's mastery skill: the 8 research skills build your marketing OS; /level tells you how far along the Claude Code curve you are and what to build next. Level 0 is "just installed it." Level 10 is genuinely rare — the documented ceiling in references/benchmark.md.

Pick a front door → Score it → Show the roadmap → Render output → Build first step
       ↓                ↓             ↓               ↓               ↓
   quiz or scan    0-10 + 4 pillars  next level only  html / ascii    optional

Re-run it whenever you want — the score updates as you level up.


Modes and flags

FlagEffect
--mode beginner (default)"Knowledgeable friend" voice — explain why each thing matters, define jargon. Default front door = quiz.
--mode internalTerser, for auditing your own / your team's setup. Default front door = scan.
--brand-kit <path>Brand the HTML dashboard from a brand kit (a DESIGN.md with token frontmatter). Default = your context/brand/brand-kit.md once populated, else plain dark. --brand-kit none forces plain dark.
--format html (default) | ascii | bothOutput shape. html = branded dashboard. ascii = paste-anywhere card (Slack / LinkedIn / a code block). both = each.
--quiz / --assessForce the quiz, or the silent scan (then stop after the assessment).
--buildSkip assessment; jump to building the next step.

No flag → --mode beginner, and offer both front doors ("Want the quick quiz, or should I scan your repo?").


Phase 1 — pick a front door, then score

Both doors converge on the same result: a level (0-10) + a 0-4 sub-score per pillar. references/levels.md is the source of truth — the ladder, the 4-pillar mapping, the scan checklist, and the scoring rule.

Quiz (default in beginner mode)

Read references/quiz.md. Ask the ~8 questions in one AskUserQuestion call (clean clickable options — fun and fast). Map each answer to its pillar + level band, then reconcile to a level + 4 pillar sub-scores per the rule in quiz.md. Needs nothing on disk, so it works before you've built anything — and the result is screenshot-shareable.

Scan (default in internal mode)

Silently inspect the repo using the scan checklist in levels.md — CLAUDE.md, .claude/skills, .mcp.json + plugins, memory / rules, hooks + agents, headless / browser signals, worktrees, scheduled tasks. Then ask the 3 context questions (what you use Claude for / biggest friction / one thing you'd automate). Determine the level. Quantity ≠ level — 50 trivial skills is still Level 3; integration + complexity move the rungs.

Present the assessment

Anchor the ceiling with references/benchmark.md. Present, in the mode's voice: the level + its fun name + vibe; the dual lens (which pillars are strong, which is the gap); a bottom-to-top walk of the rungs cleared, then the first rung that stops you and why it matters (plain language). Most marketers land 1-4; 5 is strong; 7+ is rare. If --assess, stop here.


Phase 2 — the roadmap (next level only)

Show ONLY the next-level transition — focus is everything. Read the matching section in references/roadmaps.md for the assessed level and present its 3-4 steps with time estimates.


Generate the output

Always produce output after Phase 1 (+ Phase 2 unless --assess). Pick the shape from --format (default html). For sharing, offer the ASCII card.

HTML dashboard (--format html, default — or both)

  1. Read references/dashboard-template.html.
  2. Resolve the brand: --brand-kit <path> if given; else your context/brand/brand-kit.md (once populated); else --brand-kit none / the template's dark defaults.
  3. Map brand-kit tokens → dashboard tokens per the template's comment: colors.accent→{{ACCENT}} (primary), colors.tertiary/success→{{DONE}}, colors.background/surface→{{BG}}/{{SURFACE}}, colors.on-background*→text tokens, typography.*.fontFamily→{{FONT}} (+ its web <link> as {{FONT_LINK}}), name/domain→{{BRAND_NAME}}/{{BRAND_URL}}. Use the kit's exact hex — never approximate.
  4. Replace every {{TOKEN}} with real assessment data — per-pillar bars + the shareable result card.
  5. Write to ~/Desktop/claude-code-level.html, open it (open macOS / xdg-open Linux / start Windows), tell the user the path + the brand applied.

ASCII card (--format ascii — or both)

A fixed-width, paste-anywhere card. Build a JSON payload and pipe it to the generator (it asserts every line is identical width, so the box never misaligns):

echo '{"level":N,"name":"<level name>","vibe":"<vibe>",
"pillars":{"Context":c,"Skills":s,"Integrations":i,"Orchestration":o},
"takeaway":["short line 1 (≤48 chars)","line 2"],
"brand_name":"<your brand>","brand_url":"<your domain>"}' \
  | python3 references/ascii-card.py

It prints the card and saves ~/Desktop/claude-code-level.txt. Also paste the card inline in a fenced code block so the user can copy it from chat. brand_name/brand_url come from your brand kit's name + domain.


Phase 3 — build it now (optional)

Ask: "Want me to build the first step of your roadmap right now?" If yes, execute the matching step in references/build-steps.md. Adapt to the person — don't paste templates verbatim. If they score 0-2, point them at the quickstart's 15-minute tour and the 8 research skills to build context fast.


Self-roast (run before delivering)

  • Is the level honest, or inflated? Quantity ≠ maturity — did I check integration + complexity?
  • Did I anchor Level 10 to benchmark.md?
  • Beginner mode: did I explain why each gap matters and define jargon?
  • Did I show only the NEXT level's roadmap, not all 10?
  • Did the output actually render (dashboard opened, or ASCII card pasted inline)?

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Researches one B2B SaaS competitor across 13 dimensions (company, product, ICP, pricing, reviews, content, launches, search and AI visibility, tech stack, hiring, go-to-market, social, paid ads) and writes a sourced dossier with an executive summary, a threat level, strengths and weaknesses, and a data gaps section. Run it once per competitor, then compare. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "competitor research on", "what is [competitor] doing", "compare us to", "competitive landscape", "battlecard prep". Run after /company-context and /icp-research. Not for researching your own company (use /company-context).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house662026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Builds an ideal customer profile from evidence: case studies, testimonials, customer logos, solutions pages, reviews and any sales notes you have. Produces market sizing layers, firmographic segments, a champion and an economic buyer persona, a negative ICP, intent signals, customer proof points and a voice-of-customer section in the buyers' own words, every claim sourced. Triggers: "ICP research", "ideal customer profile", "who are our customers", "customer segments", "buyer personas", "who should we target". Run after /company-context. Not for competitor analysis (use /competitor-research) or call transcript patterns (use /win-loss).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house662026년 10월 21일 업데이트

messaging

무료

Builds a product messaging library from your positioning, your website and customer evidence: a description, the status quo and alternatives, pain points with their knock-on consequences, capabilities, functional, emotional and social benefits, branded features, the cost of doing nothing, common objections with responses, and core messaging blocks (tagline, elevator pitch, value props, proof, per-audience lines). Every claim sourced. Triggers: "product messaging", "messaging library", "messaging framework", "value props", "capabilities and benefits", "what are our differentiators in words". Run after /positioning. Not for choosing the position itself (use /positioning).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house662026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Develops B2B SaaS positioning from your ICP, competitor and win-loss evidence. Maps what buyers compare you to, chooses between leading with a category or a problem, picks a primary and secondary anchor and up to three defensible differentiators, lays out 2 to 4 worked positioning options with a comparison canvas so you can decide, then locks the chosen one and tests it (clarity ladder, guarantee test). Triggers: "positioning", "how do we position", "what category are we in", "how do we differentiate from", "our homepage is confusing", "positioning options". Run before /messaging. Not for taglines or a messaging library (use /messaging).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house662026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Extracts a company's tone of voice from its own content and turns it into rules a writer or an AI can follow. Phase 1 analyses 15 to 20 pages for sentence, paragraph, word and structure patterns with frequency counts; after the user reviews it, Phase 2 writes the guidelines: tone attributes with before and after examples, a We are / We are not table, tone by context, vocabulary to use and avoid, and open questions. Triggers: "tone of voice", "brand voice", "voice guidelines", "writing style guide", "extract voice from our website", "TOV". Not for visual identity (use /brand-kit) or messaging (use /messaging).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house662026년 10월 21일 업데이트

matteotitta의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고