본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

messaging

Builds a product messaging library from your positioning, your website and customer evidence: a description, the status quo and alternatives, pain points with their knock-on consequences, capabilities, functional, emotional and social benefits, branded features, the cost of doing nothing, common objections with responses, and core messaging blocks (tagline, elevator pitch, value props, proof, per-audience lines). Every claim sourced. Triggers: "product messaging", "messaging library", "messaging framework", "value props", "capabilities and benefits", "what are our differentiators in words". Run after /positioning. Not for choosing the position itself (use /positioning).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Messaging

Turn the position into the words people will actually use: on the website, in sales calls, in emails and ads. The library links each pain to a capability, each capability to a benefit, and each benefit to proof, so any writer can pull a line and know it holds up.

When to use it

  • Right after /positioning is agreed.
  • Before rewriting the website, a sales deck or a launch.
  • When sales, marketing and product describe the product three different ways.

Don't use it to choose the position (/positioning), or for a single-feature question you can answer directly.

Inputs

Required: the website URL and the exact product name. Confirm the name if it's ambiguous.

Recommended: read these first if they exist:

  • context/positioning/, the primary input, which frames everything
  • context/icp/ for pains and voice of customer
  • context/competitors/ for the status quo and contrasts
  • context/win-loss/ for real objections
  • context/brand/ for tone of voice

Also useful: internal docs and customer quotes. If positioning is missing, say so and offer /positioning first.

Paths. Write to context/messaging/MMYY-messaging.md. Agency or consultant? Swap context/ for clients/<client>/context/ throughout.

Tools. Page fetching for the site; web search for reviews, testimonials and comparison pages. Exa or Firecrawl if you have them.

Steps

  1. Validate inputs and load the upstream context.
  2. Research. Fetch at least five core pages (home, features, pricing, customers, about) with URLs and dates. Search reviews and testimonials. Record branded feature names exactly as the company writes them.
  3. Extract the ten components, in order:
    1. Description. What it is, in one or two sentences, using the positioning.
    2. Status quo and alternatives. Doing it by hand, plus at least one named alternative.
    3. Pain points. Each with a consequence chain: the first-order problem, what it causes, what that costs the business.
    4. Capabilities. What the product does about each pain.
    5. Functional benefits. The outcome, each backed by a verbatim customer quote or marked "not available".
    6. Emotional and social benefits. Two of each: how the buyer feels, and how they look to their boss and team.
    7. Features. The branded names that deliver each capability.
    8. Cost of inaction. What not acting costs per week or month, in numbers where you can.
    9. Objections. 3 to 5, each with its root cause and a response that acknowledges, reframes and gives evidence.
    10. Core messaging blocks. A tagline of 7 words or fewer, a one-sentence elevator pitch, a 3-bullet value prop, a lead proof point, and one line per audience segment.
  4. Link it up. Every pain points to a capability, every capability to a feature and a benefit.
  5. Verify. Check each claim against its source. Quotes are verbatim. Tag confidence [VERIFIED], [INFERRED], [ESTIMATED] or [UNAVAILABLE]. For a client-facing library, aim for at least 60% verified and no more than 10% estimated.
  6. Write the data gaps and how to fill each one.
  7. Hand off to /funnel-strategy, and to any copy work.

Output shape

Title it # Product messaging library: [Product]. Open with a TLDR and one block of open questions. Then the ten components in order, a data gaps section, and a source list with URLs and access dates.

What good looks like

  • All ten components present, or marked "not available" with a reason.
  • No pain point stops at the first-order problem.
  • The cost of inaction has a number, not an adjective.
  • The tagline and pitch match the agreed position. If they don't, flag it rather than drifting.
  • A seller could answer the top three objections using only this file.

Mistakes to avoid

  • Feature lists dressed up as benefits.
  • Invented customer quotes or made-up metrics.
  • Messaging that contradicts the positioning because a line sounded better.
  • Buzzwords where a plain verb would do.
  • Repeating the same caveat in every component. Say it once.

Chain

Part of the free five-skill chain: /icp-research → /competitor-research → /tov-guidelines → /positioning → messaging. The other six context skills (company context, win-loss, founder POV, brand kit, funnel and goals) are in the paid context plugin ($19.99, link in the README).

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Researches one B2B SaaS competitor across 13 dimensions (company, product, ICP, pricing, reviews, content, launches, search and AI visibility, tech stack, hiring, go-to-market, social, paid ads) and writes a sourced dossier with an executive summary, a threat level, strengths and weaknesses, and a data gaps section. Run it once per competitor, then compare. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "competitor research on", "what is [competitor] doing", "compare us to", "competitive landscape", "battlecard prep". Run after /company-context and /icp-research. Not for researching your own company (use /company-context).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house672026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Builds an ideal customer profile from evidence: case studies, testimonials, customer logos, solutions pages, reviews and any sales notes you have. Produces market sizing layers, firmographic segments, a champion and an economic buyer persona, a negative ICP, intent signals, customer proof points and a voice-of-customer section in the buyers' own words, every claim sourced. Triggers: "ICP research", "ideal customer profile", "who are our customers", "customer segments", "buyer personas", "who should we target". Run after /company-context. Not for competitor analysis (use /competitor-research) or call transcript patterns (use /win-loss).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house672026년 10월 21일 업데이트

level

무료

Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house672026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Develops B2B SaaS positioning from your ICP, competitor and win-loss evidence. Maps what buyers compare you to, chooses between leading with a category or a problem, picks a primary and secondary anchor and up to three defensible differentiators, lays out 2 to 4 worked positioning options with a comparison canvas so you can decide, then locks the chosen one and tests it (clarity ladder, guarantee test). Triggers: "positioning", "how do we position", "what category are we in", "how do we differentiate from", "our homepage is confusing", "positioning options". Run before /messaging. Not for taglines or a messaging library (use /messaging).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house672026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Extracts a company's tone of voice from its own content and turns it into rules a writer or an AI can follow. Phase 1 analyses 15 to 20 pages for sentence, paragraph, word and structure patterns with frequency counts; after the user reviews it, Phase 2 writes the guidelines: tone attributes with before and after examples, a We are / We are not table, tone by context, vocabulary to use and avoid, and open questions. Triggers: "tone of voice", "brand voice", "voice guidelines", "writing style guide", "extract voice from our website", "TOV". Not for visual identity (use /brand-kit) or messaging (use /messaging).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house672026년 10월 21일 업데이트

matteotitta의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고