본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

conducting-memory-forensics-with-volatility

Analyze RAM dumps with Volatility 3 to investigate suspicious processes, network connections, injected code, and credential theft. Guides memory capture and evidence extraction, then organizes findings into a forensic report for incident response.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Performs memory forensics analysis using Volatility 3 to extract evidence of malware execution, process injection, network connections, and credential theft from RAM dumps captured during incident response. Covers memory acquisition, process analysis, DLL inspection, and malware detection. Activates for requests involving memory forensics, RAM analysis, Volatility framework, memory dump investigation, volatile evidence analysis, or live memory acquisition.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Investigating malware that runs only in memory
  • Checking suspicious processes and network connections
  • Investigating signs of credential theft
  • Preparing a memory forensics report

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md10.4 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md2.3 KB
  • scripts/agent.py6.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Conducting Memory Forensics with Volatility

When to Use

  • An endpoint has been contained during an active incident and volatile evidence must be preserved
  • EDR alerts suggest process injection or fileless malware that only exists in memory
  • Encryption keys need to be recovered from a ransomware-infected system before shutdown
  • Credential theft (Mimikatz, LSASS dumping) is suspected and evidence must be confirmed
  • A rootkit or kernel-level compromise is suspected and disk-based analysis is insufficient

Do not use for analyzing disk images or file system artifacts; use disk forensics tools (Autopsy, FTK) for those tasks.

Prerequisites

  • Memory acquisition tool deployed or available: WinPmem, Magnet RAM Capture, DumpIt, or AVML (Linux)
  • Volatility 3 installed with Python 3.8+ and required symbol tables
  • Sufficient storage for memory dumps (equal to system RAM size, typically 8-64 GB)
  • YARA rules for malware detection in memory (Florian Roth's signature-base, custom rules)
  • Reference baseline of normal processes and DLLs for the OS version being analyzed
  • Chain of custody documentation for evidence handling

Workflow

Step 1: Acquire Memory Image

Capture RAM from the target system using a forensically sound method:

Windows (WinPmem):

winpmem_mini_x64.exe output.raw

Windows (Magnet RAM Capture):

MagnetRAMCapture.exe
# GUI-based, select output path, generates .raw file

Windows (DumpIt):

DumpIt.exe
# Creates memory dump in current directory automatically

Linux (AVML - Acquire Volatile Memory for Linux):

./avml output.lime

Document acquisition metadata:

Acquisition Record:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Target Host:      WKSTN-042
RAM Size:         16 GB
Dump File:        WKSTN-042_20251115_1445.raw
Dump Size:        16,843,612,160 bytes
SHA-256:          a4b3c2d1e5f6...
Acquisition Tool: WinPmem 4.0
Acquired By:      [Analyst Name]
Timestamp:        2025-11-15T14:45:00Z

Step 2: Identify the Operating System and Profile

Volatility 3 automatically identifies the OS, but verify:

# Get system information
vol -f WKSTN-042_20251115_1445.raw windows.info

# Output includes:
# OS: Windows 10 22H2 (Build 19045.3693)
# Kernel Base: 0xf8066c200000
# DTB: 0x1aa000
# Symbols: ntkrnlmp.pdb

Step 3: Analyze Running Processes

Examine the process tree for suspicious activity:

# List all running processes
vol -f memory.raw windows.pslist

# Show process tree (parent-child relationships)
vol -f memory.raw windows.pstree

# Scan for hidden/unlinked processes (rootkit detection)
vol -f memory.raw windows.psscan

# Compare pslist vs psscan to find hidden processes
# Processes in psscan but NOT in pslist may be hidden by rootkits

Key indicators of compromise in process analysis:

  • svchost.exe running without -k parameter or with wrong parent (should be services.exe)
  • csrss.exe or lsass.exe with abnormal parent process
  • Processes with misspelled names (scvhost.exe, lssas.exe)
  • Unusual processes spawned by outlook.exe, winword.exe, or excel.exe
  • Multiple instances of processes that should be singletons (lsass.exe, smss.exe)

Step 4: Investigate Network Connections

Extract active and recently closed network connections:

# List all network connections
vol -f memory.raw windows.netscan

# Focus output fields:
# Offset    Proto  LocalAddr     LocalPort  ForeignAddr    ForeignPort  State     PID  Owner
# 0xe10...  TCPv4  10.1.5.42     49721     185.220.101.42  443         ESTAB     3847  update.exe

Cross-reference suspicious connections with the process tree to identify C2 communications. Look for:

  • Connections to external IPs from unexpected processes
  • High port numbers connecting to port 443/80 from non-browser processes
  • Connections from svchost.exe or system processes to external IPs

Step 5: Detect Process Injection and Malware

Use malfind to identify injected code and memory-resident malware:

# Detect injected code in processes
vol -f memory.raw windows.malfind

# Output shows:
# PID  Process       Start      End        Tag  Protection  Hexdump/Disassembly
# 3847 explorer.exe  0x2a10000  0x2a14000  VadS PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE
# MZ header detected - injected PE

# Dump suspicious process memory
vol -f memory.raw windows.memmap --pid 3847 --dump

# List DLLs loaded by a suspicious process
vol -f memory.raw windows.dlllist --pid 3847

# Scan memory with YARA rules
vol -f memory.raw windows.yarascan --yara-file malware_rules.yar

Step 6: Extract Credentials and Artifacts

Recover sensitive data from memory:

# Dump registry hives from memory (for password hash extraction)
vol -f memory.raw windows.registry.hivelist
vol -f memory.raw windows.hashdump

# Extract command line history
vol -f memory.raw windows.cmdline

# List handles (files, registry keys, mutexes)
vol -f memory.raw windows.handles --pid 3847

# Extract clipboard contents
vol -f memory.raw windows.clipboard

# Dump cached files from memory
vol -f memory.raw windows.dumpfiles --pid 3847

Step 7: Generate Forensic Report

Compile findings into a structured analysis report documenting all evidence extracted from memory:

  • Process anomalies with PIDs, parent processes, and timestamps
  • Network connections with associated process context
  • Injected code regions with memory protection flags
  • Extracted IOCs (hashes, IPs, domains, mutexes, registry keys)
  • YARA rule matches with rule names and match offsets
  • Credential exposure (hashes found, accounts at risk)

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Volatile EvidenceData that exists only in RAM and is lost when a system is powered off; includes running processes, network connections, encryption keys
Process InjectionTechnique where malware inserts code into a legitimate process's memory space to evade detection (malfind detects this)
EPROCESSWindows kernel data structure representing a process; psscan searches for these structures even when unlinked from the active process list
VAD (Virtual Address Descriptor)Windows kernel structure tracking memory regions allocated to a process; malfind examines VADs for executable but non-file-backed regions
Symbol TablesOS-specific data structures that Volatility 3 uses to parse memory; downloaded automatically based on detected OS version
PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITEMemory protection flag indicating a region is readable, writable, and executable; common indicator of injected malicious code
Memory-Resident MalwareMalware that operates entirely in RAM without writing persistent files to disk, making it invisible to traditional disk-based antivirus

Tools & Systems

  • Volatility 3: Primary open-source memory forensics framework; Python 3 rewrite with automatic symbol resolution
  • WinPmem / DumpIt / Magnet RAM Capture: Memory acquisition tools for Windows systems
  • AVML (Acquire Volatile Memory for Linux): Microsoft's open-source Linux memory acquisition tool
  • YARA: Pattern matching engine for scanning memory dumps against malware signatures and behavioral rules
  • MemProcFS: Memory analysis tool that presents memory as a virtual file system for intuitive browsing

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Detecting Cobalt Strike Beacon in Memory

Context: EDR detects suspicious named pipe activity but cannot identify the source. A memory dump is acquired from the suspect endpoint for analysis.

Approach:

  1. Run windows.pstree to identify the process hierarchy and spot abnormal parent-child relationships
  2. Run windows.malfind to detect injected code regions, particularly in svchost.exe or rundll32.exe
  3. Dump the injected memory region and scan with YARA rules for Cobalt Strike beacon signatures
  4. Run windows.netscan to identify C2 connections and correlate with the injected process PID
  5. Extract the beacon configuration (C2 URLs, sleep time, jitter, watermark) using CobaltStrikeParser
  6. Run windows.cmdline to identify any post-exploitation commands executed

Pitfalls:

  • Analyzing only the process list without running malfind (missing injected code in legitimate processes)
  • Not capturing memory before isolating the endpoint (EDR containment may trigger malware self-deletion)
  • Using Volatility 2 profiles instead of Volatility 3 automatic symbol resolution on newer Windows versions

Output Format

MEMORY FORENSICS ANALYSIS REPORT
==================================
Incident:         INC-2025-1547
Evidence File:    WKSTN-042_20251115_1445.raw
SHA-256:          a4b3c2d1e5f6...
OS Identified:    Windows 10 22H2 (Build 19045)
Analysis Tool:    Volatility 3.2.0

PROCESS ANOMALIES
PID    Process         Parent       Anomaly
3847   update.exe      powershell   Suspicious executable in Temp directory
5102   svchost.exe     explorer     Wrong parent (expected services.exe)
---    [hidden]        ---          Found in psscan but not pslist

INJECTED CODE
PID    Process        Address Range        Protection              Finding
5102   svchost.exe    0x00A10000-0x00A14   PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE  MZ header (PE injection)

NETWORK CONNECTIONS
PID    Process      Local              Foreign             State
3847   update.exe   10.1.5.42:49721    185.220.101.42:443  ESTABLISHED
5102   svchost.exe  10.1.5.42:51003    91.215.85.17:8443   ESTABLISHED

YARA MATCHES
Rule: CobaltStrike_Beacon_x64
Match PID: 5102 (svchost.exe)
Offset: 0x00A10240

EXTRACTED IOCS
Hashes:     [SHA-256 of dumped injected code]
C2 IPs:     185.220.101.42, 91.215.85.17
C2 Domains: [extracted from beacon config]
Mutexes:    Global\MSCTF.Shared.MUTEX.ZRQ

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Assess exposure of Windows secrets protected by DPAPI, the operating system’s data protection service, during authorized security tests. Guide examination and decryption of saved credentials and browser data using available user sessions, credentials, or backup keys.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Assessing saved credential exposure in authorized tests
  • Examining collected DPAPI files offline
  • Reviewing protected browser and RDP credentials
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Assess Shadow Credentials account takeover during authorized Active Directory testing. Examine permissions that allow public key registration, validate authentication without a password reset, and document credential cleanup, detection opportunities, and access control changes needed for remediation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Assessing risky permissions identified in BloodHound
  • Validating account takeover without resetting a password
  • Generating directory change records during security exercises
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Prepare for CMMC Level 2, a cybersecurity certification for defense contractors. Define the systems handling controlled information, review security requirements, calculate the SPRS assessment score, and organize remediation plans and evidence into a readiness report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Define the assessment scope for systems handling controlled information
  • Calculate an SPRS score and prioritize unmet security requirements
  • Prepare security plans, remediation milestones, and assessment evidence
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Create disk images for investigations using dd or dcfldd on Linux. The workflow covers write protection, bit-for-bit copying, hash checks to verify integrity, and documentation of the acquisition process.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preserving a suspect drive before investigation
  • Creating evidence copies of USB devices or memory cards
  • Verifying that a disk image matches its source
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Review Active Directory permissions with ldap3, a Python library for directory queries. Identify excessive access granted to non-administrative accounts, explain potential privilege escalation paths, and produce a JSON report with affected objects and remediation recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Auditing excessive Active Directory permissions
  • Investigating privilege escalation paths from ordinary accounts
  • Reporting affected objects and permission remediation recommendations
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Inspect suspicious Android APK files without running them. Analyze permissions, app components, suspicious code patterns, and network indicators, then produce a JSON risk report to support malware triage and detection rule development.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Triage suspicious APK files without running them
  • Inspect dangerous permission combinations and suspicious API calls
  • Extract network indicators for malware detection rules
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

mukul975의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고