본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

root-cause-investigation

Systematic investigation of metric changes and anomalies. Use when a metric unexpectedly changes, investigating business metric drops, explaining performance variations, or drilling into aggregated metric drivers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB
  • assets/rca_report_template.md2.0 KB
  • references/hypothesis_testing_guide.md2.8 KB
  • references/rca_framework.md3.4 KB
  • scripts/drilldown_analyzer.py6.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Root Cause Investigation

When to use

  • A key metric dropped (or spiked) unexpectedly and the team needs an explanation
  • Stakeholders are asking "why did X happen?" and need an evidence-based answer
  • A metric change has been observed but the team is unsure whether it's noise or signal
  • Preparing a post-mortem after an incident that affected business metrics
  • A trend change happened weeks ago and needs retrospective investigation

Process

  1. Validate the change — confirm the metric changed beyond normal variance using a z-score or simple comparison to the rolling average. If the change is within ±1.5 standard deviations, document it as within normal range and close. Use scripts/drilldown_analyzer.py --validate.
  2. Establish a timeline — plot the metric over time to pinpoint when the change started. A sudden step change suggests a specific event; a gradual drift suggests a structural shift.
  3. Decompose the metric — break the metric into its constituent parts (e.g., revenue = volume × price × mix). Determine which component is driving the change before drilling into dimensions.
  4. Drill down systematically — compare the metric before vs. after the change across available dimensions (geography, platform, channel, product category, user segment). Sort by absolute contribution to identify the primary driver. Use scripts/drilldown_analyzer.py --drilldown. See references/rca_framework.md for the structured approach.
  5. Test hypotheses — generate explicit hypotheses (volume drop, mix shift, per-unit quality change, data issue) and accept or reject each with evidence. Correlate the timeline with known events from references/hypothesis_testing_guide.md.
  6. Write the root cause report — document the primary driver (quantified share of impact), supporting evidence, rejected hypotheses, and tiered recommendations (immediate / short-term / long-term). Use assets/rca_report_template.md.

Inputs the skill needs

  • Metric name and historical values (at least 30 days before the change)
  • Granular data with dimensional breakdowns (geography, platform, segment, etc.)
  • The date or date range when the change was noticed
  • A change log or incident log for the same period (product releases, campaigns, outages)
  • The business context: what decisions depend on this metric

Output

  • scripts/drilldown_analyzer.py — validates the change, computes dimensional drill-downs, and ranks contributors by impact
  • references/rca_framework.md — structured five-step RCA method with decision rules
  • references/hypothesis_testing_guide.md — checklist of common root causes and how to test each
  • assets/rca_report_template.md — report template: what changed, when, primary driver, supporting evidence, timeline, recommendations

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Rigorous A/B test statistical analysis. Use when analyzing experiment results, calculating statistical significance, checking for sample ratio mismatch, or validating test design before launch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4882026년 9월 25일 업데이트

Track and document analytical assumptions and decisions. Use when making analytical choices, documenting trade-offs, ensuring transparency, or creating audit trails for analytical work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4882026년 9월 25일 업데이트

Structured, reproducible analysis documentation. Use when documenting analysis findings, creating analysis notebooks, ensuring reproducibility, or building analysis archives for future reference.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4882026년 9월 25일 업데이트

Structure analysis approach before starting work. Use when receiving new analysis requests, breaking down complex questions into steps, or planning iterative analysis workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4882026년 9월 25일 업데이트

Pre-delivery quality assurance for analysis work. Use when reviewing analysis before sharing with stakeholders, checking for completeness, validating assumptions, or ensuring clarity of recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4882026년 9월 25일 업데이트

Post-analysis learning and process improvement. Use when completing major analysis projects, documenting lessons learned, or improving team analytical practices.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4882026년 9월 25일 업데이트

nimrodfisher의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고