본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

skill-doc-sync

Bring project Markdown documentation into line with code changes. Update factual references such as paths, versions, and counts, check consistency and document links, and reflect the documentation work in the pull request description.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Post-ship doc sync across project markdown. Use when: sync docs, update docs, document changes, release notes.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Updating documentation after code changes
  • Checking versions and counts across documents
  • Adding release notes to CHANGELOG
  • Finding documents without incoming links

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md9.0 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml166 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than /octo:* slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, see skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.

Post-Ship Documentation Synchronization

Automated documentation synchronization for the Deliver phase. After code is committed and a PR is created, this skill reads all .md files in the project, cross-references the diff, auto-updates factual content, checks cross-doc consistency, and updates the PR body.

Caps

  • Max 30 doc files scanned — skip files beyond the cap, warn the user
  • Never clobber CHANGELOG — append only, never delete existing entries
  • Ask user before changing narrative/philosophy sections — risky changes require confirmation

Step 1: Discover Docs

Find all .md files in the project root (max depth 2), skipping node_modules/ and .git/.

# Discover all markdown files (max depth 2, skip noise directories)
DOC_FILES=$(find . -maxdepth 2 -name '*.md' \
  -not -path './node_modules/*' \
  -not -path './.git/*' \
  -not -path './vendor/*' \
  -not -path './.claude/*' \
  2>/dev/null | head -30)

DOC_COUNT=$(echo "$DOC_FILES" | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
echo "Found $DOC_COUNT doc files to scan (cap: 30)"

if [[ "$DOC_COUNT" -ge 30 ]]; then
  echo "WARNING: Doc file cap reached (30). Some files may be skipped."
fi

Read each discovered doc file so you have their current content in context.

Step 2: Cross-Reference Diff

Run git diff --stat HEAD~1 (or diff against the base branch if on a feature branch) to identify which files changed and what content may now be stale in each doc.

# Get the diff stat to identify changed files
BRANCH=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)
if [[ "$BRANCH" == "main" || "$BRANCH" == "master" ]]; then
  DIFF_STAT=$(git diff --stat HEAD~1)
  DIFF_FULL=$(git diff HEAD~1)
else
  BASE_BRANCH=$(git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null)
  DIFF_STAT=$(git diff --stat "$BASE_BRANCH"..HEAD)
  DIFF_FULL=$(git diff "$BASE_BRANCH"..HEAD)
fi

echo "$DIFF_STAT"

For each doc file, check whether any paths, function names, counts, or version numbers mentioned in the doc were affected by the diff.

Step 3: Auto-Update Factual Corrections

Fix paths, counts, table entries, and version numbers automatically. These are mechanical changes that do not alter meaning.

Auto-update targets:

  • File paths that were renamed or moved in the diff
  • Numeric counts (e.g., "42 tests" when the number changed)
  • Version strings (e.g., v9.5.0 when package.json bumped)
  • Table entries referencing renamed or removed items
  • Import/require paths that changed

WHY: Stale factual references erode trust in documentation. A user who sees a wrong path or count will doubt everything else in the doc.

Step 4: Risky Change Detection

Flag narrative, philosophy, or security-related doc sections for user confirmation. Do NOT auto-edit these.

Risky categories (require user approval):

  • Sections with headings containing: "Philosophy", "Principles", "Vision", "Mission", "Security", "Threat Model", "Architecture Decision"
  • Paragraphs that express opinion, strategy, or rationale (not just facts)
  • Content under ## Why or ## Rationale headings
  • Any changes to SECURITY.md or CONTRIBUTING.md beyond version bumps

WHY: Narrative and philosophy sections reflect human judgment. Silently rewriting them risks misrepresenting the project's intent.

When risky changes are detected, present them to the user:

The following doc sections may need updating but contain narrative/philosophy content.
I will NOT auto-edit these. Please review and confirm each change:

1. README.md ## Philosophy — mentions "single-binary deployment" but diff adds Docker support
2. SECURITY.md ## Threat Model — new auth endpoint not documented

Approve changes? (list numbers to approve, or "skip all")

Step 5: CHANGELOG Voice Polish

Apply the "sell test" to every CHANGELOG entry: "Would a user reading this bullet think 'oh nice, I want to try that'?"

Rules:

  • Lead with the user benefit, not the implementation detail
  • Use active voice ("Add X" not "X was added")
  • Keep bullets under 120 characters
  • Never delete existing CHANGELOG entries (append only)
  • Group by: Added, Changed, Fixed, Removed (Keep a Changelog format)

Example transformations:

BAD:  "Refactored spawn_agent to use parameter expansion instead of basename"
GOOD: "Speed up agent spawning by eliminating 750 subshell forks (92% reduction)"

BAD:  "Added SUPPORTS_MCP_ELICITATION flag"
GOOD: "Support MCP elicitation for richer interactive prompts (CC v2.1.76+)"

WHY: The CHANGELOG is marketing copy for developers. Every bullet should make someone want to upgrade.

Step 6: Cross-Doc Consistency

Check that key values are aligned across all documentation files.

Consistency checks:

  • Version numbers match across README.md, CLAUDE.md, package.json, CHANGELOG.md, and any other files referencing the current version
  • Feature lists in README match what is actually implemented (cross-reference with command/skill directories)
  • Badge URLs and shield.io references are up to date
  • Links between docs are not broken (relative path references)
  • Command counts and skill counts match actual directory listings
# Example: check version consistency
PKG_VERSION=$(grep '"version"' package.json | head -1 | sed 's/.*"version": *"//' | sed 's/".*//')
echo "package.json version: $PKG_VERSION"

# Check README mentions this version
if ! grep -q "$PKG_VERSION" README.md 2>/dev/null; then
  echo "WARNING: README.md does not mention version $PKG_VERSION"
fi

# Check CHANGELOG has an entry for this version
if ! grep -q "$PKG_VERSION" CHANGELOG.md 2>/dev/null; then
  echo "WARNING: CHANGELOG.md has no entry for version $PKG_VERSION"
fi

Step 7: Discoverability Check

Ensure every documentation file is reachable from README.md or CLAUDE.md. Orphaned docs are invisible docs.

Check:

  • Every .md file in the project should be linked from either README.md or CLAUDE.md (directly or transitively through another linked doc)
  • Flag orphaned docs that have no inbound links
  • Suggest where to add links for orphaned docs

WHY: Documentation that cannot be found does not exist from the user's perspective. Every doc must be one or two clicks from the entry points.

Step 8: TODOS.md Update

Update the project's task tracking based on the diff.

Actions:

  • Mark completed items: scan TODO/FIXME/HACK comments that were removed in the diff and mark corresponding items as done
  • Flag new deferred work: scan TODO/FIXME/HACK comments that were added in the diff and create new tracking entries
  • Update completion percentages if the project uses progress tracking
# Find new TODOs added in the diff
NEW_TODOS=$(echo "$DIFF_FULL" | grep '^+' | grep -iE 'TODO|FIXME|HACK' | grep -v '^+++' || true)
if [[ -n "$NEW_TODOS" ]]; then
  echo "New TODOs found in diff:"
  echo "$NEW_TODOS"
fi

# Find TODOs removed in the diff
REMOVED_TODOS=$(echo "$DIFF_FULL" | grep '^-' | grep -iE 'TODO|FIXME|HACK' | grep -v '^---' || true)
if [[ -n "$REMOVED_TODOS" ]]; then
  echo "Resolved TODOs (removed in diff):"
  echo "$REMOVED_TODOS"
fi

Step 9: Commit Doc Changes

Commit all documentation changes to the current branch and update the PR body with a doc-sync summary.

# Stage only .md files that were modified by this skill
git add *.md docs/*.md 2>/dev/null || true

# Check if there are staged changes
if git diff --cached --quiet; then
  echo "No documentation changes needed — all docs are up to date."
else
  git commit -m "docs: post-ship documentation sync

  - Auto-updated paths, counts, and version references
  - CHANGELOG entries polished for user benefit
  - Cross-doc consistency verified
  - Discoverability check passed
  "

  echo "Documentation sync committed."
fi

If a PR exists for the current branch, update its body to include a doc-sync section:

# Update PR body with doc-sync summary (if PR exists)
PR_NUMBER=$(gh pr view --json number -q '.number' 2>/dev/null || true)
if [[ -n "$PR_NUMBER" ]]; then
  echo "Updating PR #$PR_NUMBER with doc-sync summary..."
fi

Integration

This skill is designed to work as a sub-step of flow-deliver. After validation and review are complete, invoke doc-sync to ensure documentation stays current with the shipped code.

Invocation from flow-deliver:

After PR creation and CI passes:
1. Run doc-sync to update documentation
2. Push doc changes to the PR branch
3. Re-run CI if doc changes affect tests

Standalone invocation:

User: "sync docs"
User: "update documentation after merge"
User: "document changes from last release"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Interpret the saved results of a completed AI council review. Count verdicts, check whether enough participants responded and whether models are independent, surface substantive dissent, and explain what action the outcome supports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Explain a completed council review
  • Check vote counts and quorum
  • Assess model independence and dissent
nyldn/claude-octopus4.3천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Turn a technical choice into a structured debate between different AI model families. Assign explicit positions, launch the discussion, and summarize agreement, disagreement, and a recommendation supported by the strongest argument that survives the debate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Compare Redis and Memcached for session storage
  • Debate monorepo versus polyrepo organization
  • Examine a technical choice from opposing positions
nyldn/claude-octopus4.3천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Multi-AI requirements scoping using available external providers (Double Diamond Define phase). Priority triggers: octo define, octo scope, co-define, co-scope. DO NOT use for implementation, research, review/validation, or built-in commands.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nyldn/claude-octopus4.3천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Review code or documents with available AI providers before delivery. Combine findings into a scored validation report that checks prior requirements and decisions, separates critical issues from warnings, and recommends next steps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review authentication code before release
  • Check API readiness before deployment
  • Review a PRD for missing requirements
nyldn/claude-octopus4.3천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Develop complex features or business documents by gathering approaches from available AI providers. Combine their perspectives with prior project decisions and quality checks to produce a proposed plan, then proceed with implementation after user confirmation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning and implementing a complex feature
  • Comparing approaches for an external service integration
  • Developing a product requirements document or strategy
nyldn/claude-octopus4.3천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Research technical or business questions through multiple available AI providers, each assigned a different perspective. Combine usable results into a report covering findings, disagreements, evidence gaps, priorities, and recommended next steps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Compare libraries and technical approaches
  • Research markets and competitor strategies
  • Synthesize literature from multiple perspectives
nyldn/claude-octopus4.3천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

nyldn의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고