본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

finishing-a-development-branch

Complete development with structured merge/PR options. Use when ready to merge or submit work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(10)

  • SKILL.md9.0 KB
  • commands/finishing-a-development-branch.md130 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs338 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs455 B
  • references/research-requirements.md405 B
  • rules/finishing-a-development-branch.md365 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json297 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json658 B
  • scripts/main.cjs615 B
  • templates/implementation-template.md204 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.

Core principle: Verify tests -> Present options -> Execute choice -> Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Before presenting options, verify tests pass:

# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...

If tests fail:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.

Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Determine Base Branch

# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null

Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"

Step 3: Present Options

Present exactly these 4 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work

Which option?

Don't add explanation - keep options concise.

Step 4: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

# Switch to base branch
git checkout <base-branch>

# Pull latest
git pull

# Merge feature branch
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 2: Push and Create PR

# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>

# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>

## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."

Don't cleanup worktree.

Option 4: Discard

Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for exact confirmation.

If confirmed:

git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Step 4.5: Cleanup Scan (MANDATORY)

Run this before ANY commit, regardless of which option was chosen.

4.5.1 — Project root scan:

ls -1 | grep -vE '^(\.|node_modules|src|tests|scripts|dist|build|docs|package\.json|package-lock\.json|pnpm-lock\.yaml|tsconfig|eslint|prettier|jest|vitest|README|LICENSE|CHANGELOG|CLAUDE\.md|\.env)'

If this outputs anything, those files are AI slop. Delete or move them before proceeding.

4.5.2 — Prune stale worktrees:

git worktree prune

4.5.3 — Clean temp directory:

ls .claude/context/tmp/ 2>/dev/null && echo "Temp files exist — delete if from this session"

4.5.4 — Log to session gap log if slop was found:

echo '{"timestamp":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","type":"cleanup","agent":"developer","description":"Deleted AI slop from project root: <filenames>","context":"finishing-a-development-branch cleanup scan"}' >> .claude/context/runtime/session-gap-log.jsonl

4.5.5 — Queue reflection if slop was found (append to reflection-spawn-request.json):

{
  "id": "<uuid>",
  "trigger": "ai-slop-found",
  "priority": "low",
  "context": "Cleanup scan found unexpected files in project root. Investigate which task created them."
}

See .claude/rules/cleanup-always.md for the full slop pattern list and correct file destinations.

Step 5: Cleanup Worktree

For Options 1, 2, 4:

Check if in worktree:

git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)

If yes:

git worktree remove <worktree-path>

For Option 3: Keep worktree.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locallyYes--Yes
2. Create PR-YesYes-
3. Keep as-is--Yes-
4. Discard---Yes (force)

Common Mistakes

Skipping test verification

  • Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
  • Fix: Always verify tests before offering options

Open-ended questions

  • Problem: "What should I do next?" -> ambiguous
  • Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options

Automatic worktree cleanup

  • Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
  • Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

No confirmation for discard

  • Problem: Accidentally delete work
  • Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation

Red Flags

Never:

  • Proceed with failing tests
  • Merge without verifying tests on result
  • Delete work without confirmation
  • Force-push without explicit request

Always:

  • Verify tests before offering options
  • Present exactly 4 options
  • Get typed confirmation for Option 4
  • Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only

Integration

Called by:

  • subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
  • executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete

Pairs with:

  • using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill

Documentation Gate (BLOCKING — must pass before commit)

Before ANY commit on a feature/skill/agent branch:

  • CHANGELOG.md — entry added under [Unreleased] with today's date
  • README.md — updated if agent/skill counts changed or new user-facing capability added
  • .env.example — commented entry added for EVERY new API key, token, or env var introduced
  • Skill/agent description — frontmatter description: accurately reflects new capabilities

If any item is unchecked → DO NOT COMMIT. Update docs first.

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS run the full test suite and verify it passes before offering any merge/PR option — presenting merge options with failing tests leads to broken main branches and failed CI pipelines.
  2. NEVER force-push to main/master or squash commits without explicit user request — these operations rewrite history and can permanently destroy teammates' work.
  3. ALWAYS present exactly the 4 structured options (merge, PR, keep, discard) — open-ended "what next?" questions cause confusion and missed cleanup steps.
  4. NEVER delete a branch or discard work without typed confirmation from the user — accidental deletion of uncommitted work is irreversible.
  5. ALWAYS clean up the worktree for Options 1 and 4 but preserve it for Options 2 and 3 — orphaned worktrees accumulate and confuse future git operations.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Skipping test verification before mergeBroken code lands on main; CI fails after the factAlways run test suite first; gate options on passing tests
Presenting open-ended completion questionsDeveloper doesn't know available paths; worktrees left orphanedPresent exactly 4 numbered options with clear labels
Deleting branch without confirmationDeveloper loses in-progress work permanentlyRequire typed "discard" confirmation for Option 4
Cleaning up worktree for Option 2 (PR)Kills local context before PR review is completeOnly remove worktree for Options 1 and 4
Merging directly without pulling latest baseMerge conflicts or stale base; CI detects driftgit pull on base branch before git merge

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

oimiragieo의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고