'completion' 검색 결과

Design and implement command-line tools with subcommands, options, interactive prompts, and progress indicators. Get command structures, configuration handling, clear error messages, and shell completion scripts, with guidance for automated use and testing across operating systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Build a command-line tool with subcommands and options
• Add interactive prompts and progress indicators
• Provide bash, zsh, and fish command completion

Manage projects involving multiple Workers with a shared plan that records task status, assignments, and dependencies. It covers project setup, task completion updates, plan changes, blocked work, and final notifications to the administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Start a project involving multiple Workers
• Assign tasks and handle completion reports
• Revise plans when tasks become blocked

Use Neo4j GenAI Plugin ai.text.* functions and procedures for in-Cypher embedding generation, text completion, structured output, chat, tokenization, and batch ingestion. Covers ai.text.embed(), ai.text.embedBatch(), ai.text.completion(), ai.text.structuredCompletion(), ai.text.aggregateCompletion(), ai.text.chat(), ai.text.tokenCount(), ai.text.chunkByTokenLimit(), and provider configuration for OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, VertexAI, and Amazon Bedrock. Requires CYPHER 25. Replaces deprecated genai.vector.encode(). Use when writing pure-Cypher GraphRAG, embedding nodes in-graph, generating structured maps from prompts, or calling LLMs inside Cypher queries. Does NOT handle neo4j-graphrag Python library pipelines — use neo4j-graphrag-skill. Does NOT handle vector index creation/search — use neo4j-vector-index-skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates shell completion scripts for CLI tools. Parses command structure from help output, commander/yargs configs, or manual specification. Produces completions for bash, zsh, and fish that follow each shell's conventions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates shell completion scripts for CLI tools. Parses command structure from help output, commander/yargs configs, or manual specification. Produces completions for bash, zsh, and fish that follow each shell's conventions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Add shell completion support via a 'completion' subcommand for bash, zsh, and fish. Generic pattern for any Commander.js CLI, with static and dynamic completion examples.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI 에이전트의 반복 작업을 설계·점검합니다. 기계로 판정할 완료 조건, 변경 금지 경계, 독립 검증과 재시도 상한을 정해 헛돌거나 통제를 벗어나는 일을 방지합니다.

• 반복 작업의 완료 조건 정의
• 헛도는 반복과 검증 우회 점검
• 계획·구현·검증의 역할 분담

AI 에이전트의 도구 구성, 입력과 출력 형식, 오류 복구 절차를 설계합니다. 문맥 정보량을 관리하고 완료율, 재시도 횟수, 성공한 작업당 비용으로 개선을 평가합니다.

• 에이전트 도구와 입력 형식을 설계합니다
• 도구 결과와 다음 행동을 명확히 합니다
• 안전한 재시도와 중단 조건을 정합니다

Work with Jira issues through Orca's command-line interface. Search issues, move them through workflow states, create follow-up issues, and record completion with a PR or MR link and a comment using guidance matched to the installed Orca version.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Working from a linked Jira issue
• Searching issues with JQL
• Moving issues through workflow states

Manage Linear issues through Orca’s command-line interface. Find tickets, move them through workflow states, create follow-up tickets linked to a parent, and record completion with a PR/MR link and a comment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Start work from a linked Linear issue
• Update a ticket’s workflow state
• Record completion with a PR/MR link

Work with Linear tickets through Orca's CLI. Find issues, update workflow states, report completion with a PR or MR link and a comment, and create follow-up tickets linked to a parent issue.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Working from a linked Linear issue
• Reporting completion with a PR or MR link and a comment
• Searching tickets and updating workflow states

Audit an AI agent's completion claims using existing logs, artifacts, approvals, and deployment records. Reconstruct the run and assess each claim separately, distinguishing proven results, partial support, contradictory evidence, and missing proof without rerunning the work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking whether an agent's completion report has supporting evidence
• Reviewing tool calls, retries, and checkpoint recovery
• Matching approvals and deployments to the same artifact

Break a development task into small requirements with explicit acceptance criteria, then repeat implementation and verification while saving progress. Completion depends on evidence for each requirement and reviewer approval, with configurable reviewers and a final cleanup check.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Carrying a multi-step implementation through verification
• Resuming work with recorded progress
• Tracking evidence for each requirement

Coordinate project delivery by routing requests to eight specialist skills or running a verified delivery workflow. Use live Jira data for progress analysis and completion forecasts, with recorded evidence and checks before tasks are closed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Analyze sprint progress and forecast completion ranges
• Produce project health reports from live Jira data
• Route Jira permission and configuration reviews

Reviews contact, lead capture, and checkout forms to identify obstacles to completion. Produces justified field recommendations, clearer button and error text, mobile layout guidance, and hypotheses for testing alternative designs while preserving useful submission data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Improving contact form completion
• Reviewing required fields for demo requests
• Reducing mobile form abandonment

Run iterative development with repeated implementation and verification, using failure history to guide changes. When a verification command is configured, an independent hook checks completion after the agent's own tests, with pause and abort markers available.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Repeating fixes until failing tests pass
• Checking completion with a separate build or test command
• Revisiting an approach after repeated verification failures

Address repeated failures, passive execution, or unsupported completion claims with stern corporate-style coaching. The skill ties diagnosis to action, prompts meaningful changes of approach, and requires evidence and remaining risks when reporting results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Redirecting an agent that keeps repeating a failed approach
• Requesting test evidence before accepting a completion claim
• Getting a passive agent to act on its diagnosis

Execute development subtasks under a supervising agent, starting with an implementation plan and impact analysis. Deliver code and a three-question self-review in a defined completion format for the supervisor to assess.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Delegating an implementation subtask to an agent
• Planning changes and assessing their impact before coding
• Handing over code with a structured self-review

Use an English working contract in Trae to address repeated failures or unverified completion. It separates execution, self-review, and acceptance, guiding agents through small checks and delivering results with evidence, residual risks, and confirmation needs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Restarting a stalled task in Trae with a different approach
• Requesting command output to support a completion claim
• Reviewing changes with evidence and remaining risks

Guide Trae through stalled tasks by comparing hypotheses, changing approaches after repeated failures, and checking results with relevant commands. It structures delivery around evidence, self-review, and remaining risks rather than unsupported claims of completion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reassess a task after repeated failures
• Check evidence behind a completion claim
• Report verified results and remaining risks

Use the P7 engineering workflow in Codex CLI through a command alias. It guides planning, implementation, and a three-question self-review, then requires command and output evidence before reporting completion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Calling the P7 workflow from Codex CLI
• Planning, implementing, and reviewing a coding task
• Reporting completion with command and output evidence

Guide a Trae agent through recurring failures with diagnosis, alternative approaches, and relevant checks. The skill defines when to intervene, requires evidence for completion, and separates the agent’s self-review from external validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Change approaches after repeated failures
• Check evidence behind a completion claim
• Review risks and validation gaps before delivery

Audit a development milestone before archiving it by checking requirements, connections between phases, and complete user flows. It reads existing verification reports and gathers technical debt and deferred gaps to assess whether the original completion criteria were met.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking completion criteria before archiving a milestone
• Reviewing coverage of milestone requirements
• Checking connections and user flows across phases

Verify work before reporting completion, committing changes, or creating a pull request. Run the checks that support each claim, inspect their output and exit codes, and report the actual results rather than relying on assumptions or agent reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Verify results before reporting completion
• Reproduce the original bug to check a fix
• Check tests and builds before committing or opening a PR