본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

doherty-threshold

Assess perceived interface speed using 400ms as a response-time target. Set timing budgets for common interactions and plan immediate feedback, loading indicators, or progress displays when completion takes longer, helping users understand what is happening.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Apply the Doherty Threshold — keep system response under 400ms to preserve user flow. Use when diagnosing perceived slowness or setting a performance budget. For what to show during unavoidable waits, use `loading-states`.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Investigating delays in search and filtering
  • Setting timing targets for screen transitions
  • Designing feedback for slow operations
  • Prioritizing frequently used interactions

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Doherty Threshold

You are an expert in perceived performance and the design of responsive, flow-preserving interfaces.

What You Do

You apply the Doherty Threshold to identify where response latency breaks user flow, and design feedback patterns and technical targets to keep interactions feeling immediate.

The Principle

Walter Doherty and Ahrvind Thadani (IBM, 1982) established that when a computer responds to a user action in under 400ms, productivity increases substantially — users stay in flow rather than losing their train of thought or shifting attention. Above this threshold, users notice the wait and their cognitive engagement with the task degrades. The key thresholds:

Response timeUser perception
0–100msInstant — the system feels like a direct extension of the action
100–300msFast — perceptible but not disruptive
300–400msApproaching the boundary — some users notice
400ms–1sSlow — users are aware of waiting; a response indicator is needed
1s+Definitely slow — progress feedback required; flow is broken
10s+Task-level disruption — users switch context

Design Applications

Where Sub-400ms Matters Most

  • Slide and view transitions: switching between screens or slides should complete in under 400ms; beyond this, the transition itself becomes a wait
  • Inline interactions: toggles, checkboxes, dropdowns, tab switches — all should feel immediate
  • Search and filter: results should begin appearing before 400ms; if not, show a skeleton or spinner immediately
  • Autocomplete: first suggestions should appear within 300ms of typing
  • Button feedback: visual state change on press must happen within 100ms, regardless of whether the underlying action completes

When You Cannot Meet the Threshold

If the system genuinely cannot respond in under 400ms:

  1. Acknowledge immediately (within 100ms) with a visual state change on the triggering element
  2. Show a loading indicator if completion will take 400ms–3s
  3. Show progress (not just a spinner) if completion will take more than 3s
  4. Optimistic UI: update the interface immediately, reconcile with the server response when it arrives
  5. Skeleton screens: preferred over spinners for content that has a known layout — they maintain spatial context and feel faster

What the Doherty Threshold Is Not

  • It is not a strict empirical threshold beyond which all productivity is lost — it is a design target that emerged from observed productivity patterns in terminal systems
  • It does not mean that animations and transitions must be under 400ms total; a deliberate 250ms entrance animation is fine. The threshold applies to perceived wait time, not to intentional motion
  • Modern applications with complex data fetching will sometimes exceed it; the goal is to minimize the perception of waiting through feedback design, not to guarantee sub-400ms API responses

Best Practices

  • Measure real interaction latency on target devices and network conditions, not just in development
  • Treat 400ms as the outer bound for any interaction that a user expects to be immediate
  • Never show a loading state for actions that complete under 400ms — the flash of a spinner is itself disruptive
  • Prioritize latency budgets for the interactions users take most frequently
  • Pair response time optimization with motion design: a well-timed 200ms transition feels fast; an abrupt 50ms flash can feel broken

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Plan A/B experiments to measure the effect of a design change. Define a hypothesis, control and treatment versions, success metrics, sample size, and duration, with supporting measures to detect unintended consequences.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a comparison between current and proposed designs
  • Defining success metrics for a change
  • Estimating sample size and test duration
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3.1천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Assess an existing interface against WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidelines. Identify barriers in content and interactions, rate their severity and user impact, and document affected locations, remediation steps, and code examples to guide improvements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing accessibility in an existing design or build
  • Checking keyboard access and assistive technology compatibility
  • Prioritizing fixes by severity and user impact
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3.1천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Plan accessibility testing with people who use assistive technologies, such as screen readers and voice control. Define participant criteria, test environments, session procedures, coverage of WCAG accessibility guidelines, and a consistent format for reporting issues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning test sessions with assistive technology users
  • Defining participant recruitment criteria
  • Mapping key user flows to test environments
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3.1천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Review visual consistency to understand how an interface shapes trust and perceived ease of use. Examine spacing, alignment, typography, and overlooked screen states to guide visual improvements alongside usability testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigating poor feedback on a functional interface
  • Checking visual consistency before launch
  • Reviewing error, empty, and loading states
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3.1천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Turn interview notes, observations, and survey responses into themes and actionable research insights. Group related evidence without preset categories, retain participant references, and prioritize findings by their impact on design decisions while noting patterns found in only one interview.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Synthesize findings across multiple interviews
  • Organize observation notes and survey responses
  • Prioritize research insights for design decisions
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3.1천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Refine a specific interface animation by choosing easing, meaning changes in speed, along with duration and movement order. Use it to tune buttons, modals, transitions, or loading indicators so motion guides attention and communicates changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Tune how a modal enters and exits
  • Adjust button and toggle animations
  • Coordinate the order of related movements
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3.1천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Owl-Listener의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고