본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

interview-script

Write a structured interview guide — warm-up, core exploration, and wrap-up. Use before running interviews. For analysing what comes back, use `summarize-interview`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Interview Script

Create a structured user interview script for qualitative research.

Context

You are a senior UX researcher preparing an interview script for $ARGUMENTS. If the user provides files (personas, research goals, product context), read them first.

Domain Context

  • User Interviews (Steve Portigal, Interviewing Users): Open-ended questions that reveal motivations, behaviors, and mental models.
  • Follow the funnel approach: broad context questions before specific feature questions.
  • Use JTBD probing: When did you last...? What were you trying to accomplish? What happened next?
  • Avoid leading questions, hypotheticals, and yes/no questions.

Instructions

  1. Clarify objectives: Confirm the research goals, target participants, and interview duration.
  2. Create the script with these sections:
    • Introduction (2-3 min): Welcome, explain purpose, set expectations, get consent
    • Warm-up (3-5 min): Easy context-setting questions about their background and role
    • Core exploration (20-30 min): Deep-dive questions organized by research theme, with follow-up probes
    • Specific scenarios (10-15 min): Walk-through of specific tasks or experiences
    • Wrap-up (3-5 min): Summary, anything we missed, next steps, thank you
  3. Include probing techniques: "Tell me more about that", "Why was that important?", "What happened next?"
  4. Add facilitator notes: Tips for staying neutral, handling tangents, and managing time.
  5. Think step by step. Present the script in a ready-to-use format.

Question Quality Guardrails

Ensure all questions are non-leading. A leading question contains the answer or implies a preferred response. Replace any question that assumes sentiment, behaviour, or outcome.

Leading (avoid)Non-leading (use)
"Was that frustrating?""How did you feel about that?"
"Did you find it easy?""How easy or difficult was that for you?"
"Did you like the feature?""What did you notice about that feature, if anything?"
"Would you use this?""How would you use this in your work, if at all?"

Test each question before including it: If the question contains its own implied answer, rewrite it as an open invitation. If the question can be answered with yes or no, extend it ("...and why?").

Further Reading

  • Interviewing Users — Steve Portigal
  • Just Enough Research — Erika Hall

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design an A/B experiment — hypothesis, variants, primary metric, and sample size. Use when a change can be measured quantitatively at scale. For observing behaviour qualitatively, use `test-scenario`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills3천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Audit an existing interface against WCAG, producing findings with severity ratings and remediation steps. Use when you have a design or build to assess now. Not for planning future sessions with assistive-technology users — use `accessibility-test-plan` (prototyping-testing).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills3천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Plan accessibility testing — assistive technologies, participant criteria, WCAG coverage, and session protocol. Use when scheduling testing with real AT users. Not for evaluating a design yourself — use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills3천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Apply the Aesthetic-Usability Effect — polished, consistent interfaces are perceived as more usable and forgive minor friction. Use when justifying visual polish or diagnosing why a functional design tests badly. For emotional resonance specifically, use `interfaces-that-feel` (interaction-design).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills3천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Cluster many qualitative data points into themes and insight statements. Use when synthesising across multiple sessions or sources. For a single transcript use `summarize-interview`; for one segment's inner state use `empathy-map`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills3천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Apply animation principles — easing, staging, follow-through — to one specific UI motion. Use when tuning how an animation feels. For product-wide duration and easing tokens use `motion-system` (design-systems); for a full interaction spec use `micro-interaction-spec`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills3천2026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Owl-Listener의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고