Set line length and measure for comfortable reading across type sizes and breakpoints. Use when tuning body text. Covers measure only — for the full size and weight scale, use `typography-scale`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
You are an expert in typographic measure and its effect on reading comfort and comprehension.
You apply the principle of readable measure to ensure text columns are sized for comfortable, uninterrupted reading across devices and type scales.
Measure is the length of a line of text. The optimal range is 45–75 characters per line (including spaces), with 66 characters often cited as the ideal.
ch CSS unit (width of the 0 glyph) as a rough proxy: max-width: 65chch is approximate| Context | Target |
|---|---|
| Long-form articles, docs | 55–70 characters |
| UI body copy, descriptions | 45–65 characters |
| Captions, helper text | 40–60 characters |
| Pull quotes, callouts | 30–45 characters |
max-width on text containers, not just font size아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Design an A/B experiment — hypothesis, variants, primary metric, and sample size. Use when a change can be measured quantitatively at scale. For observing behaviour qualitatively, use `test-scenario`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit an existing interface against WCAG, producing findings with severity ratings and remediation steps. Use when you have a design or build to assess now. Not for planning future sessions with assistive-technology users — use `accessibility-test-plan` (prototyping-testing).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan accessibility testing — assistive technologies, participant criteria, WCAG coverage, and session protocol. Use when scheduling testing with real AT users. Not for evaluating a design yourself — use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply the Aesthetic-Usability Effect — polished, consistent interfaces are perceived as more usable and forgive minor friction. Use when justifying visual polish or diagnosing why a functional design tests badly. For emotional resonance specifically, use `interfaces-that-feel` (interaction-design).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Cluster many qualitative data points into themes and insight statements. Use when synthesising across multiple sessions or sources. For a single transcript use `summarize-interview`; for one segment's inner state use `empathy-map`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply animation principles — easing, staging, follow-through — to one specific UI motion. Use when tuning how an animation feels. For product-wide duration and easing tokens use `motion-system` (design-systems); for a full interaction spec use `micro-interaction-spec`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.