Polish (rephrase) a rebuttal message template for clarity and professionalism while preserving the original structure, tone, and intent.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Rephrase a rebuttal-related message (e.g. nudge email, status update) so it reads naturally and clearly.
{{reviewerId}}, {{submissionId}}, or literal X must remain verbatim.Return JSON only (no markdown fences) with this schema:
{"text": "...polished text..."}
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Verification guide for citations added during rebuttal writing. Use when Stage 2 responses introduce new references, when the Area Chair asks about a cited paper, or when any citation in the rebuttal might have been AI-generated. Prevents the serious credibility damage of fabricated references in reviewer-facing documents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Summarize extracted paper text into concise Markdown memory for later Stage 2 and Stage 4 background use, with fixed section headings and no fabricated claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic review response strategy guide for RebuttalStudio. Use when developing response strategies for reviewer comments, deciding how to classify concerns, or choosing between Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment approaches at any stage of the rebuttal pipeline.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-stage rebuttal analysis skill for RebuttalStudio. Use when organizing reviewer comments into stage-specific conference workflows, including stage1 breakdown, stage2 refinement, stage4 multi-round follow-up, and stage5 final remarks generation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.