Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Structural decisions protect option value. Code-level decisions protect simplicity. Over-engineering is often a premature decision that closes doors. The right foundational data structure keeps doors open.
Data structures first. Get the data shape right before writing logic. The right shape makes downstream code obvious. Define core types early, trace every access pattern, and choose structures that match the dominant paths. A data-structure change late is a rewrite. Early, it is often a one-line diff.
At code level, DRY the structure, not every line. Types and data models should converge. Three similar statements still beat a premature abstraction. Prefer explicit over clever. Test behavior and edge cases, not line counts.
Concurrency corollary. Before sharing state between actors, ask "what happens if another actor modifies this concurrently?" If not "nothing", isolate.
Scaffold first. If something helps every later phase, do it first. Ask "does every subsequent phase benefit from this existing?" CI, linting, test infrastructure, and shared types are scaffold. Sequence for option value: setup before features, tests before fixes. Keep commits small and single-purpose.
Each increment should land a coherent abstraction or deepen one that exists. Do not spread a new capability across callers as special-case coordination.
Subtraction comes before scaffolding: remove dead weight first, then lay foundations.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in. Use for /architect, 'architect this', 'design this', or non-trivial work where jumping to code would lock in the wrong shape.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
在 rove 仓库内跑 auto-motion——把 transcription.srt 拆成多段 MG 动画镜头并拼接成竖屏视频(storyboard 分镜 + theme.md 全片主题 + 逐镜头 claude -p 子进程 + ffmpeg 拼接)。本 skill 是薄 wrapper:解析 auto-motion 模板根,继承 rove 品牌 theme,执行逻辑以 auto-motion 仓库的 canonical SKILL.md 为准。当用户说"跑 auto-motion"、"把这个字幕稿/口播稿做成视频"、"给 rove 做一条 MG 宣传片"时使用。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Draft Rove release notes as Changesets. Writes user-facing entries as `.changeset/*.md` files for `@sma1lboy/rove` (consumed into `packages/rove/CHANGELOG.md` at release time). Use when the user asks for "changelog", "release notes", "what changed", "add a changeset", or before cutting a version. Enforces Rove's no-soft-wrap rule so GitHub release pages render flowing text.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions via show-me-your-work. Use for /figure-it-out, 'figure it out', a large migration, or when no narrower playbook applies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.