본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

hotfix

Emergency fix workflow that bypasses normal sprint processes with a full audit trail. Creates hotfix branch, tracks approvals, and ensures the fix is backported correctly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Explicit invocation only: This skill should only run when the user explicitly requests it with /hotfix. Do not auto-invoke based on context matching.

Phase 1: Assess Severity

Read the bug description or ID. Determine severity:

  • S1 (Critical): Game unplayable, data loss, security vulnerability — hotfix immediately
  • S2 (Major): Significant feature broken, workaround exists — hotfix within 24 hours
  • If severity is S3 or lower, recommend using the normal bug fix workflow instead and stop.

Phase 2: Create Hotfix Record

Draft the hotfix record:

## Hotfix: [Short Description]
Date: [Date]
Severity: [S1/S2]
Reporter: [Who found it]
Status: IN PROGRESS

### Problem
[Clear description of what is broken and the player impact]

### Root Cause
[To be filled during investigation]

### Fix
[To be filled during implementation]

### Testing
[What was tested and how]

### Approvals
- [ ] Fix reviewed by lead-programmer
- [ ] Regression test passed (qa-tester)
- [ ] Release approved (producer)

### Rollback Plan
[How to revert if the fix causes new issues]

Ask: "May I write this to production/hotfixes/hotfix-[date]-[short-name].md?"

If yes, write the file, creating the directory if needed.


Phase 3: Create Hotfix Branch

If git is initialized, create the hotfix branch:

git checkout -b hotfix/[short-name] [release-tag-or-main]

Phase 4: Investigate and Implement

Focus on the minimal change that resolves the issue. Do NOT refactor, clean up, or add features alongside the hotfix.

Validate the fix by running targeted tests for the affected system. Check for regressions in adjacent systems.

Update the hotfix record with root cause, fix details, and test results.


Phase 5: Collect Approvals

Use the Task tool to request sign-off in parallel:

  • subagent_type: lead-programmer — Review the fix for correctness and side effects
  • subagent_type: qa-tester — Run targeted regression tests on the affected system
  • subagent_type: producer — Approve deployment timing and communication plan

All three must return APPROVE before proceeding. If any returns CONCERNS or REJECT, do not deploy — surface the issue and resolve it first.


Phase 5b: QA Re-Entry Gate

After approvals, determine the QA scope required before deploying the hotfix. Spawn qa-lead via Task with:

  • The hotfix description and affected system
  • The regression test results from Phase 5
  • A list of all systems that touch the changed files (use Grep to find callers)

Ask qa-lead: Is a full smoke check sufficient, or does this fix require a targeted team-qa pass?

Apply the verdict:

  • Smoke check sufficient — run /smoke-check against the hotfix build. If PASS, proceed to Phase 6.
  • Targeted QA pass required — run /team-qa [affected-system] scoped to the changed system only. If QA returns APPROVED or APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS, proceed to Phase 6.
  • Full QA required — S1 fixes that touch core systems may require a full /team-qa sprint. This delays deployment but prevents a bad patch.

Do not skip this gate. A hotfix that breaks something else is worse than the original bug.


Phase 6: Update Bug Status and Deploy

Update the original bug file if one exists:

## Fix Record
**Fixed in**: hotfix/[branch-name] — [commit hash or description]
**Fixed date**: [date]
**Status**: Fixed — Pending Verification

Set **Status**: Fixed — Pending Verification in the bug file header.

Output a deployment summary:

## Hotfix Ready to Deploy: [short-name]

**Severity**: [S1/S2]
**Root cause**: [one line]
**Fix**: [one line]
**QA gate**: [Smoke check PASS / Team-QA APPROVED]
**Approvals**: lead-programmer ✓ / qa-tester ✓ / producer ✓
**Rollback plan**: [from Phase 2 record]

Merge to: release branch AND development branch
Next: /bug-report verify [BUG-ID] after deploy to confirm resolution

Rules

  • Hotfixes must be the MINIMUM change to fix the issue — no cleanup, no refactoring
  • Every hotfix must have a rollback plan documented before deployment
  • Hotfix branches merge to BOTH the release branch AND the development branch
  • All hotfixes require a post-incident review within 48 hours
  • If the fix is complex enough to need more than 4 hours, escalate to technical-director

Phase 7: Post-Deploy Verification

After deploying, run /bug-report verify [BUG-ID] to confirm the fix resolved the issue in the deployed build.

If VERIFIED FIXED: run /bug-report close [BUG-ID] to formally close it. If STILL PRESENT: the hotfix failed — immediately re-open, assess rollback, and escalate.

Schedule a post-incident review within 48 hours using /retrospective hotfix.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

adopt

무료

Brownfield onboarding — audits existing project artifacts for template format compliance (not just existence), classifies gaps by impact, and produces a numbered migration plan. Run this when joining an in-progress project or upgrading from an older template version. Distinct from /project-stage-detect (which checks what exists) — this checks whether what exists will actually work with the template's skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios992026년 10월 7일 업데이트

Creates an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documenting a significant technical decision, its context, alternatives considered, and consequences. Every major technical choice should have an ADR.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios992026년 10월 7일 업데이트

Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios992026년 10월 7일 업데이트

art-bible

무료

Guided, section-by-section Art Bible authoring. Creates the visual identity specification that gates all asset production. Run after /concept-brainstorm is approved and before /map-systems or any GDD authoring begins.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios992026년 10월 7일 업데이트

Generates placeholder .aseprite files from asset specs using the Aseprite MCP. Reads asset specs and art bible, creates sprites with correct dimensions/palette/layers, exports PNGs. Run after /asset-spec has produced specs and /art-bible exists.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios992026년 10월 7일 업데이트

Audits game assets for compliance with naming conventions, file size budgets, format standards, and pipeline requirements. Identifies orphaned assets, missing references, and standard violations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios992026년 10월 7일 업데이트

striderZA의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고