본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

openapi-contract-diff

Diffs two OpenAPI versions for breaking changes (removed endpoints, deleted schemas, narrowed enums, response shape changes) using `oasdiff breaking`, severity-classifies the findings (ERR / WARN / INFO), and gates CI with `--fail-on`. Use when reviewing an OpenAPI spec change in a PR or on a release tag.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa스타 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
연동 도구Docker

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(12)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json443 B
  • evals/clean-diff-on-a-route-that-was-never-documented/criteria.json5.4 KB
  • evals/clean-diff-on-a-route-that-was-never-documented/task.md11.8 KB
  • evals/every-additive-change-fails-the-build/criteria.json5.0 KB
  • evals/every-additive-change-fails-the-build/task.md10.8 KB
  • evals/friday-spec-pr-the-api-team-calls-cosmetic/criteria.json5.0 KB
  • evals/friday-spec-pr-the-api-team-calls-cosmetic/task.md8.3 KB
  • evals/partner-integration-broke-while-the-check-stayed-green/criteria.json5.4 KB
  • evals/partner-integration-broke-while-the-check-stayed-green/task.md10.1 KB
  • evals/release-gate-printed-go-on-a-removed-200/criteria.json5.2 KB
  • evals/release-gate-printed-go-on-a-removed-200/task.md8.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

openapi-contract-diff

Overview

oasdiff is the canonical CLI for comparing two OpenAPI specifications and reporting breaking changes (oasdiff-readme). It runs over 250 checks against the diff and classifies each finding into one of three severity tiers (oasdiff-breaking):

SeverityMeaning
ERRDefinite breaking change - should be avoided.
WARNPotential breaking change - developers should be aware.
INFONon-breaking change.

This is the schema-driven counterpart to pact-contract-testing: use oasdiff when you don't control the consumers (public APIs, third- party integrations) and need to gate breaking-change shipment based on the spec alone.

When to use

  • The repo defines an OpenAPI 3 spec (openapi.yaml, openapi.json, or split-file equivalent).
  • The team wants a CI gate that fails the build on breaking spec changes between the PR and the deployed version.
  • The API has external consumers (no Pact possible) or the team isn't ready to invest in consumer-driven contracts yet.
  • You need a one-shot review tool for "is this PR going to break consumers?"

Authoring (no authoring - the spec is the contract)

Unlike Pact, oasdiff doesn't add tests to the repo. Instead it consumes two OpenAPI specs and emits a diff. Authoring effort goes into keeping the spec authoritative - i.e. ensuring the OpenAPI file in the repo accurately describes the implementation. Tools that close the spec-vs-implementation gap (Schemathesis, Spectral lint) pair well with this skill but are out of scope.

Install

# Go install (preferred for native CLI)
go install github.com/oasdiff/oasdiff@latest

# Docker (CI-friendly, no Go toolchain required)
docker pull tufin/oasdiff

(Per oasdiff-readme.)

Running

Local diff

oasdiff breaking openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml

(Per oasdiff-breaking.)

By default oasdiff prints colorized text. For machine consumption, use --format:

oasdiff breaking --format json openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml > breaking.json
oasdiff breaking --format yaml openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml
oasdiff breaking --format markdown openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml
oasdiff breaking --format html openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml > breaking.html

Available formats: text (default), JSON, YAML, markdown, HTML, plus single-line (oasdiff-breaking).

Comparing remote specs

The CLI accepts URLs directly:

oasdiff breaking \
  https://raw.githubusercontent.com/.../openapi-test1.yaml \
  https://raw.githubusercontent.com/.../openapi-test3.yaml

(Adapted from oasdiff-readme.)

Docker variant

docker run --rm -t -v "$PWD:/specs" tufin/oasdiff breaking \
  /specs/openapi-old.yaml /specs/openapi-new.yaml

--fail-on for CI gating

The exit code is the gate signal (oasdiff-breaking):

oasdiff breaking --fail-on ERR  ...   # exit 1 on ERR; default behavior most teams want
oasdiff breaking --fail-on WARN ...   # exit 1 on ERR or WARN; stricter
oasdiff breaking --fail-on INFO ...   # exit 1 on any reported change

Default for production gates: --fail-on ERR. Use --fail-on WARN for stricter projects (financial APIs, public SDKs) where even potentially- breaking changes need explicit acceptance.

What counts as breaking

oasdiff ships 250+ checks. The headline breaking patterns (oasdiff-breaking):

  • Endpoint deletion - removing a path or HTTP method.
  • Removed success response - e.g. dropping the 200 from a responses block.
  • Deleted schemas from components.schemas - even if no longer referenced.
  • Enum value removal - removing a value from an enum array. Mark the enum x-extensible-enum: true to treat removals as non-breaking (clients should ignore unknown values).
  • Response shape narrowing - changing a property type from string to integer, removing a required array entry, etc.
  • Request shape widening into required - making a previously- optional request field required.

For the full list, run oasdiff checks to dump the active rule set.

Reading the report

Text output (default) example:

1 changes: 1 error, 0 warning, 0 info
error	[response-success-status-removed] at openapi-new.yaml
	in API GET /pets
	the success response status '200' was removed

JSON output (for downstream parsing):

[
  {
    "id": "response-success-status-removed",
    "level": 3,
    "operation": "GET",
    "operationId": "listPets",
    "path": "/pets",
    "source": "openapi-new.yaml",
    "section": "paths",
    "text": "the success response status '200' was removed"
  }
]

level: 3 is ERR, 2 is WARN, 1 is INFO per the standard oasdiff convention. Pipe to jq for triage:

jq -r '.[] | select(.level==3) | "ERR " + .operation + " " + .path + " :: " + .text' breaking.json

CI integration

GitHub Actions example using the Docker image and the --fail-on ERR default:

# .github/workflows/openapi-diff.yml
name: openapi-diff

on:
  pull_request:

jobs:
  oasdiff:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0   # need merge-base SHA for `git show <base>:openapi.yaml`

      - name: Extract base spec
        run: |
          BASE_SHA=$(git merge-base origin/main HEAD)
          git show $BASE_SHA:openapi.yaml > /tmp/openapi-base.yaml

      - name: Run oasdiff
        run: |
          docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/specs" -v /tmp:/tmp tufin/oasdiff breaking \
            --fail-on ERR \
            --format text \
            /tmp/openapi-base.yaml \
            /specs/openapi.yaml | tee oasdiff-report.txt

      - name: Upload report
        if: always()
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        with:
          name: openapi-breaking-report
          path: oasdiff-report.txt
          retention-days: 14

fetch-depth: 0 is required so the merge-base of the PR resolves; the shallow clone GitHub uses by default doesn't include the merge-base commit.

For a PR comment workflow, generate --format markdown and post via actions/github-script@v7 - the markdown table format includes a clickable per-finding rationale.

References

  • oasdiff-readme - install (Go + Docker), output formats, key flags.
  • oasdiff-breaking - breaking subcommand, severity tiers, --fail-on semantics, breaking-change categories.
  • pact-contract-testing - the consumer-driven counterpart for cases where you control consumers.
  • contract-compatibility-gate - the gate skill that aggregates oasdiff output with Pact and Protobuf verdicts.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

testland의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고