본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

release

Prepare and guide software releases using rules discovered in the project and its automated build workflows. It tracks version files, helps draft release notes, runs release steps with confirmation, and checks the published result.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Generic release assistant — analyzes repo release rules, caches them in .omc/RELEASE_RULE.md, then guides the release

연동 도구GitHubDocker
설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Preparing a software version release
  • Updating version numbers across multiple files
  • Drafting release notes from commit history
  • Checking gaps before a first release

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md7.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Release Skill

A thin, repo-aware release assistant. On first run it inspects the project and CI to derive release rules, stores them in .omc/RELEASE_RULE.md for future use, then walks you through a release using those rules.

Usage

/oh-my-claudecode:release [version]
  • version is optional. If omitted the skill will ask. Accepts patch, minor, major, or an explicit semver like 2.4.0.
  • Add --refresh to force re-analysis of the repo even when a cached rule file exists.

Execution Flow

Step 0 — Load or Build Release Rules

Check whether .omc/RELEASE_RULE.md exists.

If it does NOT exist (or --refresh was passed): Run the full repo analysis below and write the file.

If it DOES exist: Read the file. Then do a quick delta check — scan .github/workflows/ (or equivalent CI dirs: .circleci/, .travis.yml, Jenkinsfile, bitbucket-pipelines.yml, gitlab-ci.yml) for any modifications newer than the last-analyzed timestamp in the rule file. If relevant workflow files changed, re-run the analysis for those sections and update the file. Report what changed.


Step 1 — Repo Analysis (first run or --refresh)

Inspect the repo and answer the following. Write answers into .omc/RELEASE_RULE.md.

1a. Version Sources

  • Locate all files that contain a version string matching the current version in package.json / pyproject.toml / Cargo.toml / build.gradle / VERSION file / etc.
  • List each file and the field or regex pattern used to find the version.
  • Detect whether there is a release automation script (e.g. scripts/release.*, Makefile release target, bump2version, release-it, semantic-release, changesets, goreleaser).

1b. Registry / Distribution

  • npm (package.json with publishConfig or npm publish in CI), PyPI (pyproject.toml + twine/flit), Cargo (Cargo.toml), Docker (Dockerfile + push step), GitHub Packages, other.
  • Is there a CI step that publishes automatically on tag push? Which workflow file and job?

1c. Release Trigger

  • Identify what starts the release: tag push (v*), manual dispatch (workflow_dispatch), merge to main/master, a release branch merge, a commit message pattern.

1d. Test Gate

  • Identify the test command and where it runs in CI.
  • Are tests required to pass before publish? Note any bypass flags.

1e. Release Notes / Changelog

  • Does a CHANGELOG.md or CHANGELOG.rst exist?
  • What convention is used: Keep a Changelog, Conventional Commits, GitHub auto-generated, none?
  • Is there a release body file (e.g. .github/release-body.md) committed pre-tag?

1f. First-Time User Check

  • Does a release workflow exist in .github/workflows/ (or equivalent)? If not, flag this and offer to scaffold one.
  • Is there a .gitignore entry preventing build artifacts from being committed? If not, flag it.
  • Are git tags being used? Run git tag --list to check. If no tags exist, flag and explain best practice.

Step 2 — Write .omc/RELEASE_RULE.md

Create or overwrite the file with this structure:

# Release Rules
<!-- last-analyzed: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ -->

## Version Sources
<!-- list of files + patterns -->

## Release Trigger
<!-- what kicks off the release -->

## Test Gate
<!-- command + CI job name -->

## Registry / Distribution
<!-- npm, PyPI, Docker, etc. + CI job that publishes -->

## Release Notes Strategy
<!-- convention + files -->

## CI Workflow Files
<!-- paths to relevant workflow files -->

## First-Time Setup Gaps
<!-- any missing pieces found during analysis, or "none" -->

Step 3 — Determine Version

If the user provided a version argument, use it. Otherwise:

  1. Show the current version (from the primary version file).
  2. Show what patch, minor, and major would produce.
  3. Ask the user which to use.

Validate the chosen version is a valid semver string.


Step 4 — Pre-Release Checklist

Present a checklist derived from the release rules. At minimum:

  • All changes intended for this release are committed and pushed
  • CI is green on the target branch
  • Tests pass locally (run the test gate command)
  • Version bump applied to all version source files
  • Release notes / changelog prepared (see Step 5)

Ask the user to confirm before proceeding, or run each step if they say "go ahead".


Step 5 — Release Notes Guidance

Help the user write good release notes. Apply whichever convention the repo uses. Default guidance when no convention is detected:

What makes a good release note:

  • Lead with what changed for users, not internal implementation details.
  • Group by type: New Features, Bug Fixes, Breaking Changes, Deprecations, Internal / Chores.
  • For each item: one sentence, link to the PR or issue, credit the author if external.
  • Breaking changes go first and must include a migration path.
  • Omit changes users never see (refactors, CI tweaks, test-only changes) unless they affect build reproducibility.

Example entry format:

### Bug Fixes
- Fix session drop on token expiry (#123) — @contributor

If the repo uses Conventional Commits, generate a draft changelog from git log <prev-tag>..HEAD --no-merges --format="%s" grouped by commit type. Show it to the user and let them edit.


Step 6 — Execute Release

Using the rules discovered, walk through:

  1. Bump version — apply to each version source file.
  2. Run tests — execute the test gate command.
  3. Commit — git add <version files> CHANGELOG.md and commit with chore(release): bump version to vX.Y.Z.
  4. Tag — git tag -a vX.Y.Z -m "vX.Y.Z" (annotated tags are preferred over lightweight).
  5. Push — git push origin <branch> && git push origin vX.Y.Z.
  6. CI takes over — if the release trigger is a tag push, remind the user that CI will handle the rest (publish, GitHub release creation). Show the expected CI workflow file.
  7. Manual publish — if no CI automation exists, list the manual publish command (e.g. npm publish --access public, twine upload dist/*).

Step 7 — First-Time Setup Suggestions

If gaps were found in Step 1f, offer concrete help:

No release workflow:

Your repo doesn't have a release CI workflow. A GitHub Actions workflow triggered on v* tag push is the most common best practice. It can:

  • Run tests
  • Publish to npm/PyPI/etc.
  • Create a GitHub Release with your release notes

Want me to scaffold a .github/workflows/release.yml for your stack?

No git tags:

This appears to be the first release. Git tags let GitHub, npm, and other tools understand your version history. We'll create your first tag in Step 6.

Build artifacts not gitignored:

Build artifacts are present in git history or not gitignored. This inflates repo size and creates merge conflicts. Want me to add them to .gitignore?


Step 8 — Verify

After the push:

  • Check CI status: gh run list --workflow=<release workflow> --limit=3 (if gh is available).
  • Check the registry (npm, PyPI) for the new version after a few minutes.
  • Confirm a GitHub Release was created: gh release view vX.Y.Z.

Report success or flag any failures.


Notes

  • This skill does not hardcode any project-specific version files or commands. Everything is derived from repo inspection.
  • .omc/RELEASE_RULE.md is a local cache. Commit it to your repo if you want to share the derived rules with your team, or add it to .gitignore if you prefer it stays local.
  • For complex monorepos or multi-package workspaces, the skill will detect workspace patterns (npm workspaces, pnpm workspaces, Cargo workspace) and adapt accordingly.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Write or revise instructions, specifications, tickets, and skill files so an agent can act without prior chat history. Make rules checkable, explain their reasons, define completion criteria, and keep authoritative information in one place.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying instructions in CLAUDE.md
  • Making specifications and tickets actionable
  • Adding completion criteria to skill procedures
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode4만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Simplify bloated AI-generated code by removing dead code, duplicated logic, and unnecessary layers while checking that existing behavior stays intact. Use a limited cleanup scope, verify changes with relevant checks, or request a review without edits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Removing duplicate logic and unused code
  • Simplifying unnecessary wrappers without changing behavior
  • Cleaning up only a specified set of changed files
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode4만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Review module relationships and change history to identify structural improvements in a codebase. Receive ranked candidates with file references, suggested changes, and risks, plus a recommendation for where to start, without modifying code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing architecture after a batch of changes
  • Investigating changes that touch too many files
  • Prioritizing structural improvements
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode4만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

ask

무료

Send questions, review requests, or implementation tasks to a supported local AI command-line tool through one shared command. The wrapper handles provider-specific options and saves the result as a Markdown file for later reference.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Requesting a security review of a patch
  • Seeking UX suggestions for a user flow
  • Drafting an implementation plan for an issue
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode4만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Turn an unclear idea into linked decision tickets on a repository’s issue tracker. Work through one decision per session, record outcomes and dependencies, and prepare a brief defining the objective, scope, and exclusions for delivery.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying the destination of an early idea
  • Mapping decisions and their dependencies
  • Resuming unresolved decisions across sessions
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode4만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

autopilot

무료

Turn a short product idea into working code through requirements analysis, technical planning, implementation, testing, and review. It coordinates agents across these stages, fixes detected problems, and reports assumptions that still need a human decision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Building a product from a short idea
  • Creating a bookstore inventory API
  • Developing a habit-tracking command-line tool
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode4만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Yeachan-Heo의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고