1.5万 件 ・ 人気順
概要と使いどころ
YOLO + FB chooser (Frame B), Sapiens2 Pose, and GUI→CLI terminal mirror for vailá video-AI tools. Use when reopening Cursor CLI, wiring GUI buttons, printing copy-paste CLI from Tkinter runs, or continuing work on vaila.py yolotrackerpose / vaila_sam / vaila_sapiens / yolov26track / yolotrain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when maintaining vailá File Manager Frame A buttons, previewed local operations, CLI parity, or interactive SSH transfer with status-file completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn Caveman's exact report-only repository observations into an operator-chosen optimization candidate with a paired baseline/candidate evaluation. Use when the user asks to inspect an optimization observation, evaluate a candidate change, or act on the current Caveman optimization report. Require a logged-in Caveman CLI connection and explicit approval; never infer money or actuation from a profile.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a deep code review across the manifold-csg crates
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a deep code review across the manifold-csg crates
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bump the manifold3d pin, add FFI + safe wrappers for new upstream C API functions, bump versions, open a PR
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze branch changes and generate a fully filled PR description ready to paste into GitHub
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surface and visualize hidden dependencies blocking delivery. Use when the user says "map our dependencies", "what's blocking what", "dependency audit", "why are teams blocked", "we have a bottleneck", "draw out the dependencies", or asks to identify cross-team blockers - even if they don't explicitly say "dependency mapping". Based on "Making Work Visible" by Dominica DeGrandis (time theft, invisible work, flow blockers).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scope a milestone to a fixed time window with variable scope. Use when the user says "scope this milestone", "what fits in the sprint", "cut scope for the release", "define the MVP for this milestone", "we need to ship by [date] what do we cut", "shape the work to fit the cycle", or needs to make hard scope decisions under a time constraint - even if they don't explicitly say "milestone scoping". Based on "Shape Up" by Ryan Singer (appetite, shaping, betting table) and "The Art of Project Management" by Scott Berkun (milestones as forcing functions, scope as a variable).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify, score, and mitigate delivery risks for a program or release. Use when the user says "risk review", "what could go wrong", "risk register", "delivery risks for this release", "program risk assessment", "identify blockers before they hit", or wants to pressure-test a plan before committing - even if they don't say "risk review". Based on "The Phoenix Project" by Kim, Behr & Spafford (unplanned work, fragile systems, single points of failure) and "The Art of Project Management" by Scott Berkun (scoping risk, milestone pressure, hidden assumptions).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze flow metrics to identify delivery bottlenecks and improve throughput. Use when the user says "flow metrics", "why is delivery slow", "cycle time analysis", "WIP analysis", "throughput review", "what's our lead time", "DORA metrics", "where is work getting stuck", "Kanban metrics", or wants to diagnose delivery performance using data - even if they don't explicitly say "flow metrics review". Based on "Making Work Visible" by Dominica DeGrandis (WIP limits, flow blockers, time thieves) and "Accelerate" by Forsgren, Humble & Kim (DORA metrics, delivery performance indicators).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a structured weekly or bi-weekly program status report for stakeholders. Use when the user says "write a status report", "program update", "stakeholder update", "weekly status", "RAG status", "program health report", "what do I send to leadership", "write the update for [program]", or needs to communicate delivery progress - even if they don't explicitly say "status report". Produces a concise, scannable report with RAG status, blockers, and decisions needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a velocity-based release roadmap with risk buffers. Use when the user says "release plan", "when will we ship", "plan the next release", "map sprints to milestones", "estimate our release date", "how many sprints until done", or wants to translate a backlog into a delivery timeline - even if they don't say "release planning". Based on "Agile Estimating and Planning" by Mike Cohn (velocity, story points, cone of uncertainty, risk buffers).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, bugs, and design issues. Use when the user says "review this code", "do a code review", "check this PR", "review this diff", "is this code good", "what's wrong with this code", "code quality check", or pastes code and wants feedback - even if they don't explicitly say "code review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug a bug or unexpected behavior systematically. Use when the user says "there's a bug", "this isn't working", "I'm getting an error", "help me debug", "why is this failing", "unexpected behavior", "test is failing", "something is broken", or describes behavior that doesn't match expectations - even if they don't say "debug".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a clear pull request description. Use when the user says "write a PR description", "PR template", "pull request description", "how do I describe this change", "commit message for this", "document this change", "open a PR for", or is about to merge code and needs to communicate what changed and why - even if they don't explicitly say "PR description".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document and prioritize technical debt. Use when the user says "tech debt", "legacy code", "this code is a mess", "refactoring plan", "we need to clean this up", "paying down debt", "this is hard to change", "how do we fix this codebase", or has code that's difficult to understand or modify - even if they don't explicitly say "technical debt".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update Claude Code skills following Anthropic's official skill standard. Use when user says "create a skill", "new skill", "write a skill", "update a skill", "skill standard", or any time a new SKILL.md file needs to be created. Also use when reviewing existing skills for standards compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert Confluence pages to clean GitHub-Flavored Markdown files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to pull a Confluence page into the local repo, convert Confluence content to markdown, download a spec from Confluence, or batch-convert multiple pages. Also triggers on Confluence URLs, page IDs, or phrases like "pull this page", "download this spec", "confluence to md". Use this even if the user just pastes a Confluence URL and says something vague like "get this" or "convert this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs senior database-administrator judgment — diagnosing replication lag or a stalled query, sizing a connection pool or index, planning a schema migration on a live table, running backup/restore and failover drills, or triaging a production incident traced to the database.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Database Architect — choosing a normalization level matched to the actual workload, resolving a CAP theorem tradeoff (consistency vs. availability) for a distributed data store, selecting a sharding/partition key aligned with the dominant query pattern, validating an indexing strategy against real query plans, or deriving RPO/RTO backup and replication requirements from actual business impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) Tool Programmer — calculating stepover from a scallop-height/surface-finish spec instead of picking one by feel, deciding whether a toolpath needs a dry run before cutting material on an unfamiliar post-processor/machine pairing, verifying datum consistency across multiple part setups, or diagnosing why cycle time jumped after a "minor" parameter change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a computer programmer implementing to a given specification — translating a design/pseudocode/systems-analyst spec into working code in a specified language, flagging spec ambiguity before writing code, maintaining or modernizing an existing codebase against its original contract, or writing unit tests that prove the implementation matches the spec (not designing the system the spec describes).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。