スキルを探す

Competitive benchmarks, solution research, and hypothesis generation for identified bottlenecks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers custom modules (>100 LOC), analyzes purpose, searches OSS alternatives via MCP Research, evaluates quality (stars, license, CVE), generates migration plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persistent cross-session knowledge base. Manages per-project learnings that compound across sessions — patterns, pitfalls, preferences, and project quirks. The agent gets smarter on your codebase over time. At session start, searches relevant learnings. During sessions, logs discoveries. Supports review, search, prune, and export. Use proactively when the agent encounters a durable project quirk, user preference, or pattern that would save 5+ minutes next time. Also use at session start to recover context. Triggers: "remember this", "log this", "what have we learned?", "show learnings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and analyze Reddit discussions for market research, product feedback, and community insights using Xpoz. Use when asked to "search Reddit", "what does Reddit think about X", "Reddit feedback on X", "subreddit analysis", or "Reddit market research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini a question and capture the full trace behind the answer (the search queries each engine ran, the pages it retrieved, and the sources it cited, span by span). Use when asked to "trace an AI answer", "see what AI engines cite", "check AI citations", "which sources does ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini use", "why does the AI recommend X", or for any GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) measurement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research current job markets and hiring requirements, analyze recent job descriptions (JDs), compare them with a user's resume, projects, skills, and constraints, and turn evidence gaps into prioritized career actions. Use when students, job seekers, or career changers ask about current role or industry outlook (including “现在行情怎么样”), whether a role or JD fits them (including “这个JD适合我吗”), cross-platform JD sampling, resume evidence gaps or truthful tailoring, what career skill to learn next, target-role course or certificate decisions, application readiness, or a capacity-bounded 30/60/90-day job-search plan. Do not use for unrelated personal or education advice, simple factual lookups, automatic job applications, or unsupported resume rewriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Karpathy-style autoresearch optimization on any content. Generates 50+ variants, scores with a 5-expert simulated panel, evolves winners through multiple rounds, outputs optimized version + full experiment log. Use when optimizing landing pages, email sequences, ad copy, headlines, form pages, CTA text, or any conversion-focused content. Triggers on "optimize this page", "run autoresearch", "score these variants", "A/B test this copy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting work in a repository under repositories/ that may lack CI configuration. Detects missing CI workflows (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI) and alerts the user to add one. Skips repos marked as research-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research in serendipity mode. Infinite loops until discovery, rigorous tracking, adversarial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine with agentic tree search. Infinite loops until discovery, rigorous tracking, adversarial review, serendipity preserved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and maintain the learnings in `docs/solutions/` against the current codebase — fix drifted paths and links, merge overlapping docs, replace guidance the code no longer supports, delete obsolete docs, reconcile the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary, then report and commit. Also bootstraps `CONCEPTS.md` on request and, when asked, culls docs whose reasoning the code already explains. Use for "refresh the learnings", "audit docs/solutions", "are our solution docs still accurate", "clean up / prune the learnings", "create a CONCEPTS.md", or after a refactor, rename, migration, or dependency upgrade that likely invalidated documented solutions. Not for capturing a new learning — use `learn-with-docs`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a solved, verified problem as a durable learning in `docs/solutions/` so the next agent or engineer does not repeat the mistake or redo the investigation, and keep the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary in step. Use after a fix, debugging session, or design decision whose reasoning is not readable from the final code, tests, or existing docs — "document this", "write up what we learned", "capture this learning", "add it to solutions", "that worked, save it for next time". Writes nothing for routine fixes the code already explains. For auditing or cleaning up existing learnings, use `learn-with-docs-refresh`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop interactive PaperJS applications for visual drawing, animation, and vector graphics. Create canvas-based experiences with JavaScript and PaperJS framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web search and research using Perplexity AI. Use when user says "search", "find", "look up", "ask", "research", or "what's the latest" for generic queries. NOT for library/framework docs (use Context7) or workspace questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform learning content (like YouTube transcripts, articles, tutorials) into actionable implementation plans using the Ship-Learn-Next framework. Use when user wants to turn advice, lessons, or educational content into concrete action steps, reps, or a learning quest.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify high-quality sales leads by analyzing your business, defining ideal customer profile, and discovering target companies with personalized contact strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze recent code changes via git history and extract software engineering lessons. Use when the user asks 'what is the lesson here?', 'what can I learn from this?', 'engineering takeaway', 'what did I just learn?', 'reflect on this code', or wants to extract principles from recent work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaborative writing partner that assists with research, outlining, drafting, citations, and iterative feedback. Helps writers create high-quality content while maintaining their unique voice and style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically fetch latest library/framework documentation for Claude Code via Context7 API. Use when you need up-to-date documentation for libraries and frameworks or asking about React, Next.js, Prisma, or any other popular library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pedagogical patterns for enriching notebooks (GameTheory model). Use when adding interpretations, structuring notebooks, or creating educational content in Jupyter notebooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic literature review methodology for social science research. Use when conducting systematic reviews, research synthesis, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, or comprehensive literature searches across economics, political science, sociology, education, public health, and development. Produces structured notebook cells with search strategy, evidence table, thematic synthesis, and gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

复杂探索资产化 / Complex Exploration：当用户面对复杂、不确定、多轮迭代的产品策略、Roadmap、商业化定价、竞品定位、复杂 PRD 前置探索、项目复盘或方法论沉淀任务时使用。它先判断任务类型，暴露隐含假设，重构真正问题，规划探索路径和中间产物，并在结束后沉淀认知、结构、方法论、工具和影响力资产。不用于简单润色、翻译、摘要、明确执行任务；问题只需早期认知校准时优先用 ai-collaboration-calibration，已有方案要压力测试时用 grill-me，系统专题研究用 research-topic-compiler。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product Research / 产品研究编译器：当用户要围绕一个产品问题做系统调研、竞品证据、替代方案、行业信号、 用户与市场研究、最佳实践提炼、产品候选池、本地 HTML 研究看板、可视化研究报告或跨职能 Dashboard 时使用。 当用户只有大白话、模糊方向、业务愿望或 Roadmap/PRD 前置材料想法，需要先转成清晰研究目标、研究问题和输出要求时也使用。 适合把研究转成 Research Project、学习报告、证据矩阵、PM 决策看板、候选池、模板、实践任务、业务判断、商业化输入或高门槛应用研究前置。适合“系统研究一个主题” “整理到 Obsidian”“做深度专题”“研究行业最佳实践”“概念解读”“概念源流”“PM 技术评审提问脚本” “行业演进看板”“这个主题对我的产品决策有什么用”“让我系统学会并输出 learning report HTML”。不适合创建 Skill、评审 SKILL.md、普通即时搜索或一次性摘要。 当用户已经要在明确候选项中选一个、需要最终推荐和排除理由时，应使用 decision-research。 当 decision-research 或 grill-me 返回一个可研究、可关闭的精确证据 gap 时，也使用本 Skill 只补 Evidence Delta。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

决策调研 / Decision-Driven Research：当用户面对一个具体决策需要找信息时使用——「有没有现成方案」 「怎么接入 X 平台」「这个技术可行吗」「业界怎么做 Y」「选 A 还是 B」「桌面端应该怎么定位」 「高级版和基础版怎么拉开差异」「这个产品方向对不对」。 核心行为：先框定研究层级和问题类型，再锚定决策问题，枚举竞争假设，主动找反对证据， 用排除逻辑给出有立场的结论。支持技术选型、产品策略、商业判断、竞品定位等所有需要做决定的调研。 可用中文唤起：「帮我调研」「有没有现成方案」「这个怎么接」「技术上可行吗」「帮我选一个」 「这个产品方向对不对」「我们应该怎么定位」「行业怎么做」。 与 research-topic-compiler 的边界：需要最终选择、推荐、排除理由、置信度和颠覆条件时用这个； 如果目标是长期学习、候选池沉淀或 Research Project，用 research-topic-compiler，再把 Candidate Backlog 交回本 Skill 做最终决策。 只有发现一个会实质改变结论、可研究且可关闭的证据 gap 时，才向 research-topic-compiler 发出精确 Return Request。 不用于：问题还没定义清楚时（先用 ai-collaboration-calibration L4-fuzzy 脑暴）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。