1.3万 件 ・ 人気順
概要と使いどころ
Generate pytest tests for Typer CLI commands. Includes fixtures (temp_storage, sample_data), CliRunner patterns, confirmation handling (y/n/--force), and edge case coverage. Use when user asks to "write tests for", "test my CLI", "add test coverage", or any CLI + test request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate educational practice questions from lecture notes to test student understanding. Use when users request practice questions, exam preparation materials, study guides, or assessment items based on lecture content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan an iOS/macOS Xcode project for common App Store rejection patterns before submission. Use when preparing an app for App Store review, after receiving a rejection from Apple, or when auditing metadata, subscriptions, privacy manifests, entitlements, or design compliance. Integrates with the asc CLI for metadata inspection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-launch and pre-commit audit for vibe coding projects. Use when asked to check whether a project is ready to ship, deploy, merge, or commit, especially for common AI-built app mistakes: broken project structure, committed secrets or cache files, environment variable hygiene, database migrations, ORM/schema drift, unsafe raw SQL, unused legacy code, dead routes/components, weak auth, missing tests, build failures, and deployment footguns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage Vapi voice AI: assistants, phone numbers, calls. Outbound calls are high actuation and need exact-match confirmation; test numbers by default. Trigger phrases: vapi, voice assistant, outbound call, AI phone call.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing, updating, or reviewing the release documentation for a Struts release or release candidate on any maintenance line (6.x, 7.x) - the Version Notes page on the cwiki, its Migration Guide entry, the GitHub release notes, and the test-build announcement mail.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a vulnerability or security report arrives for triage, when assessing a CVE/RCE/OGNL/injection claim against the code, or when drafting a reply to a security researcher — to research the claim from source without trusting the reporter and without fabricating your own facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting, updating, or reviewing an S2-XXX security bulletin on the Struts cwiki, when preparing bulletin text ahead of a CVE request, when filling a CVE record in the ASF CVE tool (cveprocess.apache.org / Vulnogram), when deciding when to publish, when publishing a bulletin and announcing it to the ASF lists, when wrapping up after the advisory mails, or when deciding how much detail about a fixed vulnerability is safe to publish.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a raster logo (PNG/JPG/WebP/screenshot) into a clean minimal SVG with edge smoothness as the primary hard gate and IoU optimized as high as reasonably possible without a fixed global threshold, then into a choreographed logo animation delivered as standalone JS-rendered HTML, applying Disney's 12 animation principles. Use when asked to animate a logo, build a logo reveal / splash screen / brand intro, convert a logo image into animated SVG or HTML, add motion to a vectorized mark, or create loading/idle/hover motion for a brand mark. v2: also handles self-crossing draw-on choreography (split-fill, exact easing subdivision, tip glint), closed variable-width ribbon fitting, and quantitative motion QA (easing probe, ink-delta continuity sweep).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage long-running shell sessions with tmux — start a detached session, run a long task, reattach later, capture output. Use when a task takes longer than a single tool call (build, test, log tail).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides an agent through reproducing, root-causing, fixing, and validating flaky tests in the PostHog monorepo. Use when a test fails intermittently in CI but passes on rerun or locally, when `hogli ci:insights` or the debugging-ci-failures skill classifies a failure as a flaky test, when given a GitHub Actions URL for a flaky job, when asked to check Trunk Flaky Tests for a test, PR, or master, or when asked to deflake, stabilize, or fix a flaky Jest, pytest, or Playwright test. Core discipline: reproduce locally before changing anything, fix the root cause (never mask it with sleeps, retries, or bigger timeouts), and prove the fix with an N-run validation loop sized to the observed failure rate. Stabilizing is not the only valid outcome — the skill also gates whether the test should exist, so deleting a test that catches nothing real, or re-leveling one that flakes because of the level it runs at, are first-class endings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gates whether a new test should exist and forces it to be efficient, protecting CI from low-value test bloat. Use before any change to what a pytest, Jest, or Playwright test asserts or sets up, down to one fixture or one assertion added to an existing block. Front-loads the value bar (every test must catch a realistic regression no existing test already catches; extend the nearest existing test before writing a new standalone one; test behavior through the public interface, not implementation details; collapse near-duplicates into parameterized cases) and the efficiency bar (deterministic, isolated, fast; pick the cheapest test level; Django TestCase over TransactionTestCase; no sleeps, no real network; no time bombs from absolute dates left to age against the real clock; no database a test never uses). Includes a "don't write it" decision tree. For fixing an existing flaky test use `/fixing-flaky-tests`; after this gate says a Playwright test is warranted, use `/playwright-test` for mechanics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trigger: improve skills, audit skills, refactor skills, skill quality. Audit and upgrade existing LLM-first skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Gentle AI harness discipline for Pi work: clarify first, track ODD work, use applicable test-first development by default, delegate when useful, and protect review workload.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill helps Claude write secure web applications. Use this when working on any web application or when a user requests a scan or audit to ensure security best practices are followed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user explicitly requests strict or test-first TDD, or when the current conversation already contains an explicit `TDD Route: strict` decision from another Aegis workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining ambiguous or high-complexity new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or when grilling/pressure-testing a plan or design. Routine small requests stay on the fast path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break large features into independently verifiable, human-reviewable slices under a feature directory in specs/. Use for risky or multi-step feature work that needs upfront questioning, API seams, browser-playable checkpoints, HTML visualizations, screenshot gates, staged implementation plans, recursive fog-of-war reslicing, or proactive research into reference implementations/best practices before slicing. Pairs with your project's verification harness and screenshot gates (the browser checkpoints), [refactor-clean](../refactor-clean/SKILL.md) (review the materialized spec so the plan describes one-owner architecture, not the feature bolted on), [screenshot-critique](../../visual/screenshot-critique/SKILL.md) and [compare-screenshots](../../visual/compare-screenshots/SKILL.md) (the visual gates), and a code-review pass (audit each slice before it lands).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Eval and improve a skill against golden cases — run the target skill blind in a fresh, context-free subagent on each example input, grade the artifact against the expected outcome, and let the gaps drive the edits. Use when the user wants to test/eval/improve/harden a skill, says "this skill keeps producing X / keeps missing Y", or hands a skill plus example input→expected-output pairs. Pairs with [write-skills](../write-skills/SKILL.md) (the authoring principles every fix obeys).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether tests earn their maintenance cost and which suite owns each contract. Use when pruning redundant tests, investigating implementation coupling or test-only production hooks, reviewing the value of proposed coverage, or auditing an entire subsystem. Use write-tests to implement the resulting test changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or rewrite AGENTS.md so it holds only lasting principles. Run it only when the user asks for it by name; never invoke it on your own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write tests that pin real behavior instead of implementation details, config values, or lucky samples. Use when adding tests for new behavior, writing a regression test, fixing a brittle or flaky test, reviewing a test diff, or when a test breaks after a refactor or config change that didn't change behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the choices an implementing agent made, not its diff — a pure decision audit that traces the session's history into a choices ledger, changes no code, and never blocks an unsupervised run. Working code still embeds architecture the user never chose; surface it because future work inherits it. Use when the user wants to review the decisions the AI made on their behalf, before merging or committing AI-implemented work, when integrating a delegated subagent's pass, or when a fix "works" but might be a point fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。