「concrete」の検索結果

Diagnose a concrete rendered hitch or stutter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI eval design and coverage audit: AI-SPEC, failure-mode rubric with severity scoring, concrete pass/fail eval cases, coverage and infrastructure scores, and mechanical acceptance gates. Use when a change ships LLM, RAG, agent, classifier, prompt, or generated-media behavior, or when asked to write evals for an AI feature, design test cases for a model surface, audit existing eval coverage, or judge whether AI behavior is safe to ship. No AI-SPEC means no eval plan, and no eval plan holds the recommended ship verdict. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the implementation code behind the AI surface (use suede-code); wiring a passing suite into CI as a required check (use suede-ci-gate); UAT of the built feature beyond the eval suite (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds distinctive, production-grade UIs that avoid generic AI aesthetics. Use whenever the user wants to build, restyle, or give visual direction to any interface — pages, dashboards, landing pages, components, onboarding flows, mobile screens, or design systems — even without an explicit 'design' request. Also triggers for: picking an aesthetic direction, improving the look of a dull/generic existing page, adding visual personality, or choosing colors/typography. Includes a bundled design intelligence database for concrete guidance across web (React, Next.js, Vue, Tailwind) and mobile (React Native, Flutter, SwiftUI).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix bugs and broken behavior when there is enough evidence to act on a repair path. Use for errors, crashes, incorrect results, API failures (500, 404, 403), CORS problems, database exceptions, broken rendering, duplicated or wrong data, off-by-one mistakes, timezone/date bugs, broken forms, config-caused runtime failures, and regressions. Trigger when the user wants the bug repaired and the conversation already contains a clear failing area, a reproducible failing test, a concrete error path, or a prior diagnosis to implement. Do NOT use for new features, pure explanation, architecture discussion, broad research, or bug reports where the main need is figuring out why the behavior happens — use diagnose for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured 8-section validation reports with verdict (GOOD/BAD/NEEDS MAJOR WORK), strengths, critical flaws, blindspots, and concrete path forward. Use after strategic-cto-mentor has completed validation analysis and needs to produce final deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a candidate security finding and before it goes in a comment - restate it, prove reachability, impact and a concrete exploit, apply triage dismissals, then the self-refute pass naming attacker and victim

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the diff changes a GitHub Actions workflow, a reusable action, a Dockerfile or compose file, Terraform/HCL, Kubernetes manifests or Helm values, or a cloud OIDC trust policy - judged only where concretely exploitable

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you add or change an endpoint, an auth check, a query by id, an outbound call to a user-supplied URL, file handling, or anything touching credentials — the OWASP API Top 10 (2023) as concrete Go and Java checks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase F of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: evolve the Avalonia trunk after cutover without reintroducing WinForms coupling or bypassing established layers. Use only when an explicit migration has an active Avalonia trunk and a concrete product backlog, or when the orchestrator routes here. Select work from repository evidence; do not assume particular entry points, integrations, settings, or extension mechanisms exist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reusable writing-style contract for agent outputs (reports, ARCH docs, verdicts, threat models). Forces direct prose with concrete evidence, no marketing voice, no hedge words. The single most-referenced skill across the pipeline — used by 28 agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Imagine the project has already shipped and failed catastrophically — work backwards from the failure to identify the most likely causes BEFORE building. Forces concrete risk identification, not vague "what could go wrong" lists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Static code review of the active diff: trace changed paths and report concrete P1/P2/P3 correctness, security, or spec bugs with file:line evidence. Use for code review or bug checks. Not runtime QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an existing lesson against UDL's three principles — engagement, representation, and action/expression. Identifies specific access barriers and suggests concrete modifications ranked by impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide graduated assistance from abstract conceptual nudge to concrete procedural step, with reflection required before each escalation. Teaches help-seeking as a skill and prevents direct-answer shortcuts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a direct experience into a full learning cycle with concrete experience, reflection, and conceptual transfer. Use when planning field trips, simulations, or practical tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a plan or concrete work prompt end-to-end. Use when implementing from docs/plans, a spec path, or a clear build request; use ce-debug for open-ended bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shape output for a reader with ADHD. Use this skill whenever responding to ANY user message including coding tasks, debugging, explanations, planning, and casual conversation. Output should lead with concrete next actions, number multi-step work, externalize state across turns, suppress tangents, give specific time estimates, and make wins visible. Trigger even on casual messages and even when the user did not explicitly ask for brevity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an /insights-style HTML report across MANY of your agent coding sessions (Claude Code and OpenAI Codex): what you work on, how you use the agent, your wins, your friction points, and concrete fixes to become more effective — precise goal-setting, not trusting output blindly, scoping, context hygiene, right-sizing models. Reads local session history and writes one self-contained report.html. Use when the user asks to "разбери мои сессии", "оцени как я работаю с агентом", "мой insights", "session insights report", "review how I work", "на что обратить внимание", or runs "/mentor", "/mentor claude", "/mentor codex", "/mentor both". Do NOT use for reviewing the CODE produced (that's code-review) or building the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to pressure-test a product, internal-tool, or OSS concept against Amazon's Working Backwards PRFAQ gauntlet before committing to a spec. Triggers on: "work backwards", "write a PRFAQ", "press release first", "is this idea worth building", "pressure-test this concept", "filter this before brainstorm", "is this a real product". Also catches solution-first pitches ("I want to build X that does Y") and technology-first pitches ("use AI to...") that need customer-first filtering. Produces a binary pass/fail verdict, not a polished doc. Hardcore coaching — direct, skeptical, concrete. On pass, hands off to brainstorm-beagle with a concept brief. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, scaffold projects, or draft specs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing Spring Boot 4 / Java 17+ code with concrete files or diffs — pull requests, modules, or pasted Java/Spring sources — for migration risks, architecture boundary leaks, JSpecify null-safety gaps, security flaws, performance regressions, or Spring Data pitfalls. Not for Kotlin-only code, non-Spring frameworks, or generic review advice without code context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit cloud infrastructure costs and produce a concrete optimization plan with specific changes and estimated savings. Use when asked to "how much is this costing", "reduce cloud spend", "cost optimization", "are we overpaying", "cloud bill", or "budget for this infra".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate a design brief — structured I-Lang or plain English — into a concrete DESIGN.md and optional HTML token preview. Resolves 8 dimensions (palette, accent, typography, display font, layout, mood, density, constraints) to specific CSS tokens. Use when asked to "create a design brief", "write a DESIGN.md", "define the design system", "design brief for X", "what tokens should we use", or "I-Lang brief".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Piaget's constructivism, schema theory, and cognitive development as practical tools for curriculum design. Covers assimilation, accommodation, equilibration, the four stages (sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, formal operational), conservation tasks, schema-based reading and problem-solving, and the distinction between developmental readiness and domain-specific expertise. Use when designing age-appropriate material, diagnosing why a learner is not assimilating new content, or building on prior knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。