「does」の検索結果

System reference for the crouton layout engine (@fyit/crouton-layout) — the LayoutTree/layout_configs data model, the croutonLayoutBlocks registry and sizing contract, the viability metric, the deterministic placer (#709), and how layouts persist and seed. Use when reasoning about WHY a layout renders/composes/persists the way it does, when a question is shaped like "what is a LayoutTree / where do layouts live / why did the placer pick this arrangement / why won't this pane shrink / where does minWidth get read", or when a generated POC boots with the wrong (or no) default layout. Trigger phrases: "layout tree", "layout_configs", "viability check", "composeDefaultLayout", "block sizing contract", "why is my layout not viable". For authoring a block component, use the block-authoring skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The map of nuxt-crouton's GitHub workflows and the deploy-pipeline anatomy — what each workflow gates, how a merge reaches Cloudflare, which secrets/tokens exist where, and how the agent-pipeline workflows chain. Use when a CI check fails and you need to know what it is, when asked "which workflow deploys X / why did staging update / what does this check gate / where is that secret / why didn't my label trigger anything", when wiring a new app into CI, or when debugging a deploy that never fired. Trigger phrases: "what runs on merge to main", "map of the workflows", "WORKER_SECRETS_JSON", "why is the daily sweep not running", "deploy-apps vs deploy-app", "which token does this workflow use".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Playwright fixture smoke harness to prove a real generated crouton app still boots, authenticates, and does CRUD after a dependency bump or package change. Use when asked to "smoke test", "run e2e", "verify against a fixture", or to check that a packages/ change doesn't break consuming apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search an index built for coding agents — GitHub issues, merged pull requests, repository READMEs, and curated documentation sites — and get back the matched passages, not just links. Use this skill whenever the question is about code: how a library, framework, or API behaves, what an error message or stack trace means, whether a bug was reported or fixed, what a function returns, what a default is, or which repos do a given thing. Triggers on "why does <library> do X", "what does this error mean", "is this a known bug", "how do I use <library>", "what's the API for", pasted stack traces, and pasted error strings. Prefer this over a general web search for programming questions — it answers from the primary source instead of a blog post about it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a coverage & quality profile of a Narrative dataset (or access rule): row count, per-column null/fill rate, cardinality, ranges, top-values, inferred column shape, and quality flags. Reads bundled stats + sample first, recovers missing/stale stats by configuring and recalculating them, and escalates to a cheap `/write-nql` query only for a measure no stat can provide. Descriptive, not prescriptive. Use when: "profile dataset N", "what does dataset N look like", "coverage and quality of <dataset>", "what id types does N emit", "null rates / cardinality for <dataset>", "is this dataset's stats fresh". (narrative-common)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the SD-22 DMSMS Guidebook (DSPO, FY24 working draft). Use for managing Diminished Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) and obsolescence across a long-lived system's life cycle: the five-step process (Prepare, Identify, Assess, Analyze, Implement) plus the Strategize overlay; standing up a DMSMS Management Team (DMT) and Management Plan (DMP); risk-based monitoring and surveillance (the risk cube, predictive tools, vendor surveys, GIDEP/DLA PDNs, critical-materials analysis); health assessments and resolution timing; costing and selecting resolutions (life-of-need buys, substitutes, redesign, technology refreshment) by AoA/BCA; and budgeting/executing resolutions through modification funding and the ECP process. Defense-sustainment / DoD-acquisition framing throughout. Does NOT teach general systems engineering, parts-management standards, or contracting law in depth, and does not reproduce DoD policy text or the source's tables and figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from IS-GPS-200 Rev N (NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment / Navigation User Segment Interfaces). Use as a worked ICD/IS exemplar: what an interface specification is, DIST-A and IRN/CCB change control, interface definition vs identification, composite-signal criteria patterns, NAV data as payload families, and time/definition hygiene. Covers Rev N synthesized notes only; does not transcribe Apps II–IV bit fields or PRN/Gold-code tables, and does not replace faa-std-025 preparation rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) 2.02 — Volume II: Architectural Data and Models. Use for DoDAF viewpoints, DM2 meta-model, capability modeling, operational architecture, systems architecture, services architecture, data/information modeling, standards compliance, project/portfolio integration, and fit-for-purpose model selection. Does not cover DoDAF Volume I (policy/governance) or Volume III (enterprise-level guidance); also does not substitute for the live DISR or DARS registries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How game development works as a process — roles, subtasks, workflows and role descriptions, especially (but not only) for Roblox. Use this skill when it's about the ORGANIZATION of game dev rather than concrete code: Which roles exist (Creative Director, Engineer, Artist, Polish/Audio, Business, QA-Tester, Game Critic)? Who does which subtask? What does a development chain (concept → backend → frontend → polish → test) look like? How do you write a Game Design Document / KONZEPT.md? How do several (AI) agents divide up a game? Also trigger on "plan a new game", "create Game Design Document", "which roles do I need for my game", "development workflow for a game", "who tests the game", "structure a game idea", "Roblox genre/monetization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answers an employee's or manager's HR policy question strictly from the policy documents the user supplies or the agent can reach as knowledge: a DRAFT answer that quotes the governing clause with its document, version and clause reference, lists the conditions and exceptions the text states, returns UNKNOWN where the documents are silent and names the role to ask. Never invents a rule, fills a gap from general practice or decides an individual's case. Use when the user asks to check a policy, for example "what does the policy say about", "am I entitled to", "how many days of leave do I get", "what is the process for requesting", "does the handbook allow" or "which clause covers". Do not use for comparing two policy versions or briefing a change, use policy-change-briefing instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate on GitHub via the REST API — repos, PRs, issues, code search, actions, releases. Use when the user wants scripted / cross-repo operations, doesn't have `gh` installed, or needs behavior the `gh` CLI doesn't expose cleanly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IRS Schedule C (Form 1040) expense category reference — every line from 8 to 27a with what belongs, what doesn't, and common mistakes. Covers COGS (Part III), operating expenses (Part II), and Form 8829 business use of home. Trigger on "what Schedule C line", "which expense category", "where does this go on Schedule C", "is this deductible".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

リポジトリの構造・技術スタック・機能一覧・セットアップ手順を動的に解析し、 包括的なドキュメントを自動生成するスキル。言語・フレームワーク問わず汎用的に動作する。 Use this skill whenever the user asks to: - Explain a repository / リポジトリの説明 / リポジトリの概要 - Generate a README / README生成 / README作成 - Understand project structure / プロジェクト構成を教えて / 構造を説明して - Learn how to run a project / 使い方を教えて / 動かし方 / セットアップ方法 - Get a repo overview / repo overview / explain this repo / what does this repo do - List features / 機能一覧 / このプロジェクトは何ができる？ - Onboard to a new codebase / コードベースのキャッチアップ / 新しいリポジトリに入った - "このリポジトリ何？" "プロジェクトの全体像" "how to run this project" - "コードの全体を把握したい" "ドキュメントを整備して" "技術スタックを知りたい" This skill is especially useful when joining a new project, onboarding team members, or when a repository lacks proper documentation. It works with ANY repository regardless of programming language, framework, or project type.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes - Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a meeting transcript into clean notes, the decisions, and who does what by when, then draft the follow-up mail and send it only after your GO. Use for "meeting notes", "action items from this meeting", "who did what in this transcript", "who does what after the call".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vendor (copy-import) a single external Claude Code skill into your own skills repo correctly — with license compliance and full provenance/attribution. Deterministic, idempotent primitive: given an upstream ref (owner/repo/path@sha or a GitHub URL) it fetches the skill, detects and gates on the license, copies the folder, injects a provenance frontmatter block (license + metadata: author/source/upstream_commit/vendored_at/provenance), ships the upstream LICENSE, adds a ## Credits section, and records a CREDITS.md ledger entry. Use when the user asks to "vendor a skill", "import a skill", "clone a skill", "borrow someone's skill", "add an external skill with attribution/credit", or スキルを取り込む / vendoring / 他人のスキルを自分のリポに取り込む. This is the import primitive that a skill-scout/curator orchestrator calls; it does NOT discover or evaluate — it correctly imports ONE skill you already chose.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about revenue, payments, subscriptions, billing, CRM deals, support tickets, production database tables, or other data that PostHog does not collect natively. Also use when a query fails because a table does not exist or returns no results for expected external data. The data warehouse can import from SaaS tools (Stripe, Hubspot, etc.), production databases (Postgres, MySQL, BigQuery, Snowflake), and other arbitrary data sources. Covers checking existing sources, identifying the right source type, and guiding the setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mendelian randomization (MR) causal inference — does an exposure, risk factor, or biomarker CAUSALLY affect a disease/outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IEU OpenGWAS / EpiGraphDB MR-EvE). Use this whenever the user asks if X causes Y, whether an observational association is actually causal or just correlation, if a biomarker/trait is a causal risk factor, wants to triangulate epidemiology against genetic evidence, or mentions Mendelian randomization, instrumental-variable analysis, two-sample MR, or genetic causal evidence — even if they never say "MR" (e.g. "is LDL cholesterol actually causal for heart disease?", "does BMI cause type 2 diabetes or just correlate?", "is CRP a causal driver of stroke?"). Covers trait-label resolution, MR effect direction/magnitude, instrument quality (MOE score), method agreement (IVW vs MR-Egger vs weighted median), bidirectional MR for reverse causation, and distinguishing causation from genetic correlation. Not for plain GWAS association lookups (use the GWAS skills) or fitting your own instruments from raw summary statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The perception-by-culture lens for psycho-logic — establish HOW a specific region, country, or subculture reads a signal before you send it, because perception is culturally coded and the same move can mean the opposite elsewhere. Use when adapting a product, price, message, or campaign to a new market; when the user asks 'will this work in [country/region]', 'why does this land in X but flop in Y', 'how do people here perceive Z', 'how do we localise/differentiate by region', or is about to copy a US/global playbook into another market. Covers the cultural dimensions that move Sutherland's levers — uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, status/power distance, high- vs low-context communication, mental-accounting norms, trust locus, and taboo/sacredness — and how each rewires reframing, costly-signaling, and experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with market-recon for live local data. 日本語・中文の相談（「この地域で通用する？」「适合本地市场吗？」）にも使う。

Rory Sutherland's 'psycho-logic' approach to marketing, product, and business problems — solve the human perception, not just the engineering or economic metric. Use when the obvious 'logical' fix is expensive, slow, or already done by every competitor; when the user asks 'how do we make people want X', 'the product/price/funnel is fine but nobody converts', 'how do we stand out', 'is there a cheaper way to fix this', or mentions behavioral economics, nudges, irrational behavior, perception, or 'it doesn't make sense but it works'. This is the ROUTER skill: it diagnoses the problem in human terms, then dispatches to reframing, costly-signaling, counterintuitive-tests, or experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's book *Alchemy*. 日本語の相談（「商品はいいのに売れない」「値下げしかない？」「競合と差別化できない」）にも使う。中文咨询（“产品很好却卖不动”“只能降价吗？”“无法差异化”）也适用。For a catalogue of individual biases, use marketing-psychology (separate plugin) instead.

Daily per-section review cycle driving a section toward the smallest, clearest form that still does everything it does today. Selects its section live each run (scripted), inventories every file, derives the target shape before any scan, works parallel reading threads into one ranked list and strikes it on a 2-3h budget. One PR per run; each run's report and Needs-Peter queue live in its own docs/health/runs/ file; 'resume' applies Peter's answers later. Use for the morning section-improvement run, 'doctor <section>', or 'run section doctor'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。