Morning preparation. Calendar lookahead, meeting context loading, open threads from yesterday, active task review. Extends briefing with actionable prep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
874 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Morning preparation. Calendar lookahead, meeting context loading, open threads from yesterday, active task review. Extends briefing with actionable prep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deduplicate and synthesize raw concept stubs into a tiered intellectual map (T1 Canon to T4 Riff), tracing idea evolution across sources over time. Transforms thousands of raw concept pages into a curated intellectual fingerprint. Includes a reversible curation cull pass (Phase 5) with hard keep/delete/merge verdicts, substance gates, grounding labels, cluster budgets, and merge-with-backlinks salience promotion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs the payroll-confidence chain end to end — forecasts cash across the payroll window with cash-flow-snapshot, ranks and drafts overdue-invoice reminders with invoice-chase to close any gap, then assembles timesheets, flags every anomaly, and stages the run with payroll-prep. On Gusto the run is staged for the owner to submit; on QuickBooks Payroll, or with no payroll system, the last step is a validated run sheet the owner keys in. This chain never presses the payroll button. Builds on the ledger (MYOB, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, or Zoho Books), with Gmail or M365, PayPal, Square, Stripe, and either Gusto or QuickBooks Payroll adding detail, and falls back to CSV and timesheet uploads. Use it whenever payroll is the worry, including "can I make payroll," "payroll is due Friday," "plan payroll," "will I have enough to pay the crew," or "I need to run payroll but money is tight." Accepts optional horizon and payroll-date arguments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sync tasks and refresh memory from your current activity. Use when pulling new assignments from your project tracker into TASKS.md, triaging stale or overdue tasks, filling memory gaps for unknown people or projects, or running a comprehensive scan to catch todos buried in chat and email.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate a GitHub issue or reported bug the way a seasoned maintainer would — form an independent model before reading the thread's theories, trace the mechanism and history, verify the diagnosis, and return a concise briefing with a verdict and fix direction. Use for triage, root-cause analysis, or re-investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request for a Factory work item — history and context first, then a verdict published on the PR — and mark the review complete
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Re-review a pull request after a push — reconcile the previous review against the new commits, look for new defects the push introduced, then a fresh pass over the whole PR, and finish with a verdict on the PR
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used to run a sandboxed deep verification of a qwen-code PR — "/verify-pr <n>", "深度验证这个 PR", A/B load-bearing proof against the base build, mock-free harnesses with wire oracles, and targeted gates — producing tmp/pr<n>-verify-<ts>/report.md plus a machine-readable verdict. Designed for the token-free CI verify job; also usable locally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to create ERD diagrams, normalize database schemas, design table relationships, or plan schema migrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing or rebalancing direct vs. partner-led channel economics — computing fully-loaded cost-to-serve per channel, channel ROI with cash / LTV / marginal lenses, and optimal channel mix subject to constraints. For Head of Commercial, RevOps, and VP Sales doing quarterly channel review when pipeline is mixed (e.g., 60% direct + 40% partner-led) and nobody actually knows which channel makes money after CAC, support load, partner discount, deal-velocity differences, retention differential, and overhead allocation are all loaded in. Outputs cost to serve, channel ROI verdicts (DOUBLE-DOWN / MAINTAIN / DEFUND / EXIT), a sensitivity-tested channel-mix recommendation, and the diminishing-returns inflection (e.g., 'which channel actually makes money — direct or partner?').
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Two-layer memory architecture for board meeting decisions. Manages raw transcripts (Layer 1) and approved decisions (Layer 2). Use when logging decisions after a board meeting, reviewing past decisions with /cs:decisions, or checking overdue action items with /cs:review. Invoked automatically by the board-meeting skill after Phase 5 founder approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore vague or ambitious ideas into a right-sized requirements-only unified plan. Use when the user wants to brainstorm or scope what to build. Not for executing already-specified work. Use ce-pov for a verdict on adopting a named external technology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses GKE persistent-storage failures — volume attach/mount errors (Regional PD on optimized VMs, fsGroup mount timeouts), disk-performance and node storage-pressure issues, slow-disk Pod-creation failures, volume-expansion problems, Local SSD / Hyperdisk Storage Pool creation errors, and Cloud Storage FUSE OOM. Use when Pods are stuck in ContainerCreating, volumes fail to attach or mount, or nodes report storage pressure. Don't use for routine storage provisioning or StorageClass/PVC authoring (see the gke-storage skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses GKE nodes reporting NotReady or Unknown status by inspecting node conditions, events, kubelet/containerd logs, and node metrics, then proposing safe remediations. Use when nodes show NotReady, when the kubelet stops posting node status, or when workloads are evicted or stuck Pending due to node health. Don't use for pod-level application failures (use gke-workload-troubleshooting), autoscaler scale-up/scale-down decisions (use gke-cluster-autoscaler), or non-GKE compute.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The phishing-report triage runbook — how to check headers, links, and attachments on a reported email against {{report_query}}, classify the risk, and post a verdict with a recommended action to {{security_channel}}. Analyze and recommend only; never block, delete, or remediate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Daily runbook for tracking new customer accounts against onboarding milestones in Postgres and HubSpot for {{projectName}}. Covers the milestone framework, stall and overdue detection, nudge drafting, the owning-CSM alert, and the human approval gate before anything sends or changes account state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aging buckets, reminder tiers, and dunning cadence for chasing overdue invoices. Load this before deciding what reminder an invoice gets so you message consistently and don't over-contact a customer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Daily HubSpot pipeline-hygiene rules — staleness, missing next step/close date, stage stalls, and overdue tasks — plus how to nudge the owning rep in Slack and escalate the day's worst offenders to the sales manager. The only write is an internal hygiene flag; stage, owner, and amount are never touched.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate Cortex, the LifeOS memory system — the typed Knowledge Archive (People, Companies, Ideas, Research with typed related: links) plus recall of prior work sessions, ISAs, and conversations. Search, add, harvest, develop, ingest, distill, graph-navigate, recall. USE WHEN cortex, knowledge, knowledge base, search knowledge, what do we know about, archive, harvest, knowledge status, develop note, add to knowledge, ingest, contradictions, knowledge graph, retrieve, mine conversations, distill, weekly digest, cortex digest, context search, prior work, recall, remember, previous sessions, context recovery, what did we do, find session, search history, resume, pick up where we left off, cold start, yesterday's work, last week, the one about. NOT FOR published-content semantic search across blog/newsletter/X/LinkedIn, or one-shot URL/YouTube ingestion via the Arbol harvester pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects AI-generated writing four ways — a heuristic audit against a catalog of known AI patterns, deterministic statistical signals (n-gram entropy, burstiness, repetition, stylometry — features never verdicts), an empirical Pangram score calibrated against known-human baselines, and a keyless scan for watermark and steganography signatures (invisible characters, homoglyphs, bidi, odd whitespace) in the bytes. USE WHEN detect AI writing, is this AI, AI detection, AI detector, did an AI write this, does this sound like AI, AI writing score, pangram, scan for AI tells, flag AI patterns, AI-isms, statistical AI signals, burstiness, text entropy, is this watermarked, detect watermark, steganography, zero-width chars, hidden characters, invisible unicode, compare drafts for AI-ness. NOT FOR rewriting prose to strip AI patterns (use a voice/authoring skill), plagiarism detection, detecting AI-generated images/video/code, or judging whether writing is any good.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics DETERMINISTIC slice (numeric core + rules-only reporter) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher, then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Codex-native limitation: upstream ships no Codex-native auditor pack, so the full nine-dimension semantic sweep requires a Claude Code session — this pack runs the honestly-scoped deterministic-only mode (it can flag, it can never say CLEAN). Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs standard-format scenarios through ScenarioRunner — ASAM OpenSCENARIO 1.x (.xosc, via --openscenario, with catalogs and ParameterDeclaration overrides) and OpenSCENARIO 2.0 (.osc, via --openscenario2, the ANTLR/osc2 pipeline). Validates a file against the schema before running, lists the bundled examples, and reports which OSC features ScenarioRunner actually implements. Use when the user asks to "run an xosc", "run an OpenSCENARIO file", "use the OpenSCENARIO standard", "run a .osc / OSC2 scenario", or hands over a scenario file from another tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。