「find」の検索結果

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, itemized impressions of AI-generated WRITING STYLE — the repo's ONLY non-integrity track. Two passes: a deterministic defensive-hedge density screen (tools/check_ai_style.py, AIS-DEFENSIVE-HEDGE) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass over the 13 AIS-* style tells (broken narrative arc, LLM phrase tics, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames, clause/formula walls, gratuitous pseudocode, bullet overuse, bold-module spam, restatement loops, focus drift, single-style figures, appendix dumping). Every finding is named, LOCATED, span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), carries not_integrity_finding:true + false_positive_risk:high + an fp_case, and gets ZERO verdict weight: the adjudicator forces it to info, excludes it from overall_verdict, and renders it in a SEPARATE report section. NOT an AI-text classifier — no scores, no "this is AI-written", no authorship probability; a paper can be CLEAN_GIVEN_EVIDENCE and still list many. Emits ai-style-impressions.findings.json; computes NO verdict; if a tell is actually substantive it routes to the integrity auditor. Triggers: "AI style", "vibe check", "writing fingerprint", "AI 文风", "vibe paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

德州扑克策略 (德州扑克策略 (Texas Hold'em) — solver/GTO 时代的无限注德州扑克竞技打法，牌手/职业视角。覆盖: (a) 理论两极 — GTO 博弈论均衡 (不可剥削的基线策略) vs Exploitative 剥削打法 (针对对手漏洞偏离均衡最大化 EV)，以及二者的实战取舍; (b) solver 时代工作流 — PioSOLVER/GTO Wizard 跑解、范围构建、节点锁定 (node-locking) 做剥削、用 HUD+数据库 (Hold'em Manager/PokerTracker/Hand2Note) 复盘找漏洞 (leak finding); (c) 牌型分层 — 现金局 (cash game) vs 锦标赛 (MTT) 的根本差异，后者叠加 ICM (独立筹码模型) 与跳台/泡沫期博弈; (d) 核心概念栈 — 范围 (range)/权益 (equity)/EV/位置 (position)/翻前开池与 3-bet/4-bet/翻后下注理论 (c-bet、极化 vs 浓缩范围、MDF 最小防守频率、阻断牌 blockers、超池下注 overbet)、SPR、底池赔率; (e) 元层 — 资金管理 (bankroll management)、桌位选择 (table selection)、方差与心态 (mental game/tilt 控制)、抽水 (rake) 与场次选择对长期赢率 (winrate, bb/100) 的影响; (f) 智识演进 — 从 Sklansky 古典手牌价值 → Janda/Tipton 博弈论 → solver 普及 → GTO Wizard 民主化求解 → AI 超人 (Libratus/Pluribus) 对人类策略的反哺。学派分歧: GTO 派 vs 剥削派、现金局 vs 锦标赛、理论自上而下 vs 牌局自下而上、solver 纯学院派 vs 实战感觉派。不含: 线下牌场运营/发牌荷官、博彩合规与赌场管理、扑克之外的牌类 (桥牌/斗地主)、纯概率赌博 (老虎机/轮盘)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 德州扑克策略 (Texas Hold'em) — solver/GTO 时代的无限注德州扑克竞技打法，牌手/职业视角。覆盖: (a) 理论两极 — GTO 博弈论均衡 (不可剥削的基线策略) vs Exploitative 剥削打法 (针对对手漏洞偏离均衡最大化 EV)，以及二者的实战取舍; (b) solver 时代工作流 — PioSOLVER/GTO Wizard 跑解、范围构建、节点锁定 (node-locking) 做剥削、用 HUD+数据库 (Hold'em Manager/PokerTracker/Hand2Note) 复盘找漏洞 (leak finding); (c) 牌型分层 — 现金局 (cash game) vs 锦标赛 (MTT) 的根本差异，后者叠加 ICM (独立筹码模型) 与跳台/泡沫期博弈; (d) 核心概念栈 — 范围 (range)/权益 (equity)/EV/位置 (position)/翻前开池与 3-bet/4-bet/翻后下注理论 (c-bet、极化 vs 浓缩范围、MDF 最小防守频率、阻断牌 blockers、超池下注 overbet)、SPR、底池赔率; (e) 元层 — 资金管理 (bankroll management)、桌位选择 (table selection)、方差与心态 (mental game/tilt 控制)、抽水 (rake) 与场次选择对长期赢率 (winrate, bb/100) 的影响; (f) 智识演进 — 从 Sklansky 古典手牌价值 → Janda/Tipton 博弈论 → solver 普及 → GTO Wizard 民主化求解 → AI 超人 (Libratus/Pluribus) 对人类策略的反哺。学派分歧: GTO 派 vs 剥削派、现金局 vs 锦标赛、理论自上而下 vs 牌局自下而上、solver 纯学院派 vs 实战感觉派。不含: 线下牌场运营/发牌荷官、博彩合规与赌场管理、扑克之外的牌类 (桥牌/斗地主)、纯概率赌博 (老虎机/轮盘)。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 德州扑克策略 (Texas Hold'em) — solver/GTO 时代的无限注德州扑克竞技打法，牌手/职业视角。覆盖: (a) 理论两极 — GTO 博弈论均衡 (不可剥削的基线策略) vs Exploitative 剥削打法 (针对对手漏洞偏离均衡最大化 EV)，以及二者的实战取舍; (b) solver 时代工作流 — PioSOLVER/GTO Wizard 跑解、范围构建、节点锁定 (node-locking) 做剥削、用 HUD+数据库 (Hold'em Manager/PokerTracker/Hand2Note) 复盘找漏洞 (leak finding); (c) 牌型分层 — 现金局 (cash game) vs 锦标赛 (MTT) 的根本差异，后者叠加 ICM (独立筹码模型) 与跳台/泡沫期博弈; (d) 核心概念栈 — 范围 (range)/权益 (equity)/EV/位置 (position)/翻前开池与 3-bet/4-bet/翻后下注理论 (c-bet、极化 vs 浓缩范围、MDF 最小防守频率、阻断牌 blockers、超池下注 overbet)、SPR、底池赔率; (e) 元层 — 资金管理 (bankroll management)、桌位选择 (table selection)、方差与心态 (mental game/tilt 控制)、抽水 (rake) 与场次选择对长期赢率 (winrate, bb/100) 的影响; (f) 智识演进 — 从 Sklansky 古典手牌价值 → Janda/Tipton 博弈论 → solver 普及 → GTO Wizard 民主化求解 → AI 超人 (Libratus/Pluribus) 对人类策略的反哺。学派分歧: GTO 派 vs 剥削派、现金局 vs 锦标赛、理论自上而下 vs 牌局自下而上、solver 纯学院派 vs 实战感觉派。不含: 线下牌场运营/发牌荷官、博彩合规与赌场管理、扑克之外的牌类 (桥牌/斗地主)、纯概率赌博 (老虎机/轮盘)。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「德州扑克」「德扑」「Texas Hold'em」「poker strategy」「扑克策略」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI blunt A-F ship grade for a code change across correctness, security and permissions, data and state, domain truth, UX and release behavior, tests and verification, and deploy readiness, with Instant-F triggers and evidence-based grade caps on auth, payment, migration, and public-API surfaces. Use when asked to grade this, give it a letter, is this an A, how ready is this to ship, or should this merge: when the caller wants the verdict without a findings list. NOT FOR: findings, evidence, and fix briefs (use suede-code-review, or suede-code for findings plus grade); enforcing the verdict in CI (use suede-ci-gate); eval coverage for AI behavior (use suede-ai-eval).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the agent skills ecosystem to discover and install skills that extend AI coding agent capabilities. Use when user asks "how do I do X" (X being a common task), "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or expresses interest in extending agent capabilities. Triggers on "find a skill", "install a skill", "skill for [task]", "can you do X", "I need help with [domain]", "how do I [task]". Do NOT use when user has explicitly asked to proceed without a skill, or when the task is better handled by agent's built-in capabilities (file operations, git, basic coding).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix routine that fixes the whole class of bug, not just the reported instance. Use for any bug report, failing production behaviour, monitoring alert, audit finding or review finding that does real harm (a smaller review finding goes on the item's list, as ship-check says), and whenever the same kind of bug has been seen before. Reproduces it with a failing test, names the failure class, searches the task's scope for the same pattern (the whole codebase when the user's own prompt asks for the fix, not when it is picked from a task's list), fixes or records every hit, and adds the rule, invariant, helper or check that stops it coming back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform image-based product search on the 1688 platform. Use an image URL to find visually similar supplier products, returning title, price, minimum order quantity, monthly sales, repurchase rate, trade score, and seller identity. Triggered when users mention 1688 image search, 1688 visual search, find supplier by image, reverse image search 1688, 1688 product sourcing by image, or Alibaba 1688 image search. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "image search," this skill should be triggered whenever a user provides an image URL and wants to find matching or similar products on the 1688 wholesale platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform image-based visual product search on Amazon across 8 marketplaces. Use an image URL to find visually similar products, with optional Nexscope enrichment for sales data. Triggered when users mention Amazon image search, Amazon visual search, find similar products on Amazon, reverse image lookup Amazon, Amazon search by photo, or competitor image search. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "image search," this skill should be triggered whenever a user provides an image URL and wants to find visually matching or similar products on Amazon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and analyze products on the Chinese 1688 wholesale platform (Alibaba domestic B2B market) for sourcing, supplier discovery, and product selection. Trigger when the user mentions 1688 product search, finding suppliers on 1688, wholesale product queries, factory sourcing, dropshipping supplier search, 1688 keyword product selection, wholesale price comparison, filtering by sales volume, any product research on the 1688 platform, 1688 search, 1688 product selection, find suppliers, factory lookup, wholesale pricing, supplier search, domestic sourcing, 1688 products. Even if the user does not explicitly say "1688", if their need involves searching for wholesale products, finding domestic suppliers, or sourcing from the domestic Chinese market, this skill should also be triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search free commercial-use creative assets across multiple online sources — photos, illustrations, icons, video footage, music, sound effects, and fonts. Use when the user needs to find assets for videos, PPTs, articles, or any content creation. Trigger on phrases like "find me a photo of", "search for icons", "I need background music", "find video footage", "search fonts", "找一张图片", "搜素材", "帮我找图标/视频/音乐/字体". Covers Pexels, Unsplash, Pixabay, Iconify, Freesound, Google Fonts and more — with API-backed search where available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find existing Docker image tags on GHCR for Hyperlane agent, monorepo, or node service images. Use when the user wants to find a recent image, look up an image for a branch or commit, or check what's currently deployed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit existing icons and illustrations in a codebase — find inconsistencies, unoptimized SVGs, and accessibility gaps. Use when asked to "audit our icons and illustrations", "find unoptimized SVGs", or "find inconsistent assets".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches and discovers academic papers across multiple sources (Semantic Scholar, arXiv, Tavily, Exa, Gemini deep research, AMiner, Google Scholar) with adaptive engine selection based on query type. Returns ranked, deduplicated results with metadata (authors, venue, year, citations, abstract, PDF link). Use when the user asks to find papers / literature / publications / preprints / references on a topic, search for related work, look up a specific paper by title or DOI or arXiv ID, find papers by an author, find recent SOTA / state-of-the-art work, survey a research area, or run a deep / comprehensive literature search with synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit skill lifecycle by tracing call chains, detecting circular dependencies, finding instruction contradictions, identifying duplicated datasets, analyzing bidirectional coherence, discovering scriptable sequences, and learning patterns. Use when checking skill coherence, validating skill workflow, finding semantic gaps in plugin structure, or auditing plugin before marketplace submission. Generates audit reports to .plugin-creator/audits/ with findings by dimension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a whole deliverable (talk, course module, paper, chapter, or referee report) against its manifest without rewriting it. Runs a deterministic gate for build, citations, numbers, facts, and leaks and stops on failure, then runs a finder over each section and a strong-model pass over the whole work, and adjudicates into checks/<date>/findings.json and report.md with anchored findings, severities, and honest NOT CHECKED coverage within a dollar budget. Use when asked to lint or review the whole talk, module, or paper, for a pre-ship review, or for the night shift. Revision stays serial and author-led.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic codebase search, code indexing, and prompt enhancement via standalone CLI. Use when: (1) Semantic code search with natural language queries, (2) Code indexing for remote codebase retrieval, (3) Prompt enhancement with codebase context, (4) Before grep/find/glob operations for better accuracy, (5) Complex requirements clarification, (6) Large codebase navigation. Triggers: "search context", "enhance prompt", "find code that", "index project", "clarify requirements". IMPORTANT: Always use ace-tool BEFORE grep/find/glob for semantic-level code location.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic code understanding with IDE-like symbol operations. Use when: (1) Large codebase analysis (>50 files), (2) Symbol-level operations (find, rename, refactor), (3) Cross-file reference tracking, (4) Project memory and session persistence, (5) Multi-language semantic navigation. Triggers: "find symbol", "rename function", "find references", "symbol overview", "project memory". IMPORTANT: Prioritize Serena's symbolic tools over file-based grep/read for code exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US accounting and tax firms (CPA firms) — financial-statement audit, SOC 1/2 audit, corporate tax, bookkeeping for businesses, advisory/fractional CFO, M&A diligence, 409A valuations, R&D tax credits, IPO readiness, sales-and-use tax. Triggers on "find me a CPA firm for our delaware c-corp series A audit", "shortlist three audit firms with SaaS experience", "we need a tax advisor for our M&A", or "pull contact info for these 10 accounting firm domains", even when described indirectly (audit our books, fractional CFO support, file our 1120). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip personal/consumer tax preparation (1040, individual estate, retirement planning), in-house controller/CFO hires, "how do I file my taxes" DIY questions, accounting-software comparisons (QuickBooks vs Xero), non-US firms, individual freelance bookkeepers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, enrich, or research US professional-services firms — law, marketing, consulting, accounting, IT services, architecture, engineering, HR, PR, design, and similar B2B service providers. Triggers on requests like "find me a PPC agency in California", "shortlist three boutique IP law firms", "build a longlist of 50 mid-size IT consultancies", or "here are 12 agency domains — pull contact info and confirm which are US-based", even when the need is described indirectly without naming a category. Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog with filters for industry, services, location, size, ratings, and third-party listings. Skip when the user is asking for personal/consumer services for themselves (an individual's own legal, tax, or medical needs), non-US firms, individual freelancers, retail/ecommerce/SaaS-product companies, recruiting-an-employee tasks, or general web research that doesn't need a structured firm directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US recruiting and staffing firms — executive search/retained search, RPO, tech/sales/healthcare recruiting, contingent/contract staffing, and temp staffing. Triggers on "find me an executive search firm for a CFO search", "shortlist three retained-search boutiques in NY focused on tech", "we need RPO support for a 50-engineer hiring push", or "pull contact info for these 8 staffing firm domains", even when described indirectly (need help hiring at scale, executive recruiter for senior roles). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip when the user wants to hire someone as their own employee (job-board questions, in-house recruiter hires, "where should I post the role"), individual job-seekers looking for recruiters to represent them, candidate-side career coaching, non-US firms, individual freelance recruiters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US B2B law firms — corporate, IP/patent, M&A and securities, employment, commercial litigation, regulatory/compliance, data privacy/cyber, real estate, and tax. Triggers on "find three boutique IP law firms in California", "shortlist M&A counsel for a Series-B fundraise", "patent prosecution for our hardware startup", or "pull contact info for these 10 law firm domains", even when described indirectly (outside counsel, cap-table review, GDPR/SOC2 oversight). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip personal/consumer legal services where the user is the end client (divorce, personal injury, criminal defense, family law, estate planning, wills) — the catalog is B2B-only. Also skip in-house GC hires, "is this NDA enforceable" DIY questions, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US management consultancies — strategy, operations, executive coaching, leadership development, org-development/change management, PMO/program management, sales/revenue operations consulting. Triggers on "find me three top strategy consultancies in California", "shortlist boutique ops-consulting firms with healthcare experience", "we need an executive coach for our new CEO", or "pull contact info for these 10 consulting firm domains", even when described indirectly (post-merger integration help, change-management partner, fractional COO). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip in-house strategy hires, "help me build a strategy" do-the-work asks, framework comparisons (Lean vs Agile, BCG matrix, etc.), academic/MBA-program questions, life/career coaching for individuals, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。