「goals」の検索結果

Prompt engineering and task-specification skill for improving prompts, agent instructions, system messages, evaluation prompts, coding-agent tasks, multi-step workflows, and LLM output reliability. Use when rewriting vague prompts, adding constraints, reducing ambiguity, improving safety, creating reusable prompt templates, or converting goals into actionable agent instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Equal Opportunity Representative or Officer — running an adverse-impact analysis on hiring or promotion selection rates, conducting an availability analysis to set affirmative action placement goals, evaluating a compensation-equity regression for unexplained pay gaps, or preparing an affirmative action plan (AAP) for an OFCCP audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify career direction, set goals, and build actionable development plans through structured coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build agents that work toward goals with minimal supervision — goal decomposition, self-correction loops, safe autonomy levels, and long-horizon task management. Use when an agent must run for hours or complete open-ended tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an empowered team brief. Use when the user says "team brief", "product brief", "give the team a problem", "empowered team", "how do I brief engineering", "delegate to the team", "product mission", or wants to give a team clear goals without dictating the solution - even if they don't say "team brief".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess team health using Patrick Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team model. Use when a leader says "my team feels off", "we have trust issues", "people aren't speaking up in meetings", "accountability is a problem", "we keep missing commitments", "the team is siloed", "we're not working well together", or "I want to do a team health check". Also trigger when someone describes symptoms like passive agreement in meetings, blame culture, missed deadlines without escalation, or people optimizing for their own metrics over team goals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when designing, generating an MVP blueprint for, auditing, troubleshooting, refactoring, or explaining an agentic harness for any domain. Covers provider-neutral agent architecture for OpenAI, Anthropic, and OpenAI-compatible APIs: agent loops, tool design, record provenance, interactive presentation, user-memory lifecycles, environment-adaptive tools, speculative tool execution, late-bound capabilities, permissions, system prompts, planning, goals, always-on agents and durable runtime, adaptive agent teams, context compaction, memory, skills, MCP/external connectors, public-board communications, hardware agents and board deployment, self-refining recursive harnesses, programmable context, continual refinement, observability, evals, prompt caching, agent-legible environments, feedback loops, and safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure care plan templates, problems, goals, and tasks in Salesforce Health Cloud - the Integrated Care Management (ICM) model (Spring '23+, FHIR R4-aligned) and the legacy CarePlanTemplate__c + Case Tasks model. Trigger keywords: care plan template, ICM care plan, PGI library, action plan template, problem definition, goal definition. NOT for enrolling a patient into a clinical program - use admin/care-program-management. NOT for care team workflow, transition of care and SDOH barriers - use admin/care-coordination-requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when mapping care coordination process requirements for Health Cloud: designing care team workflows, transition of care handoffs, social determinants of health (SDOH) barrier tracking, and care gap identification. NOT for building care plan templates, problems, and goals — use admin/care-plan-configuration. NOT for referral routing and provider networks — use admin/referral-management-health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure or troubleshoot Health Cloud Care Programs: CareProgram hierarchy, patient enrollment (CareProgramEnrollee), consent prerequisites, program products (CareProgramEnrolleeProduct), provider associations (CareProgramProvider). Trigger keywords: care program, program enrollment, enrollee, program product, consent for enrollment, patient program outcome. NOT for care plan templates, problems and goals - use admin/care-plan-configuration. NOT for patient records, person accounts and care team roles - use admin/health-cloud-patient-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a HyperFrames video composition from a brief/script autonomously. Uses separated builder and critic subagents — builders never review their own work. Quality decisions are grounded in project context (identity, audience, goals) and established visual/motion design principles. Measurable criteria (text size, contrast, overflow) are verified with tooling, not visual judgment. Use when the user says "make this video", "implement this brief", "build this composition", or provides a video script/brief to implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a task iteratively over a user-specified duration by dispatching subagents. The orchestrator stays strictly linear and time-checked, but each iteration fans out MULTIPLE subagents in parallel over independent units (and those subagents may fan out further). Shared state — a compact progress digest and a growing environment cheatsheet — lives on disk and is passed to every subagent BY REFERENCE, killing the per-subagent rediscovery tax. Every subagent first reads an initialiser preamble that points it at that shared state and makes it write findings back, so the cheatsheet populates itself; role prompts are produced ONCE on the filesystem by a single scaffold command and dispatched by path, never re-typed per dispatch. Subagents persist their results to disk and return only a tiny status, so the orchestrator's context stays small and lasts. The orchestrator classifies the goal as FINITE or OPEN-ENDED: finite lists may finish early; open-ended goals use the full duration, never idle, never manufacture busywork. Use when the user gives a task and a duration and wants it ground out iteratively by subagents over that time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning macronutrient targets, calculating daily calorie ranges, or building meal plans based on body type, activity level, and fitness goals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI planning coach using the 4To1 Method™ — turn 4-year vision into daily action. Connects to Notion, Todoist, Google Calendar, or local Markdown. Use when user wants to plan goals, do weekly reviews, track projects, or set up a planning system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about website analytics, traffic, visitors, page views, referrers, conversions, goals, or mentions "fusionaly". Answers from a self-hosted Fusionaly instance through its MCP tools (or its SQL API), in plain English with numbers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks iteration progress toward task completion goals. Monitors quality trends, detects plateauing, and recommends when to stop iterating. Activate on 'convergence tracking', 'iteration progress', 'quality trend', 'stop iterating', 'progress monitoring'. NOT for iteration detection (use dag-iteration-detector) or feedback synthesis (use dag-feedback-synthesizer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill guides clinicians to reassess glucose monitoring frequency when discontinuing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or transitioning to multiple daily injections (MDI). It is triggered by phrases such as 'Plan for glucose monitoring after pump stop' or 'Determine SMBG/CGM frequency post-pump' to ensure individualized glycemic goals are met.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suggests that adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) receive education, training, and ongoing support to achieve and maintain individualized glycemic goals. Trigger phrases include: 'Patient on pump plus CGM, arrange education' and 'Ensure CSII+CGM users get training and support'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establishes age- and gender-specific blood pressure goals for pediatric patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) using published normative data to assess treatment adequacy and avoid over-treatment. Use when managing hypertension in children with PA to evaluate if BP is adequately controlled; triggers include pediatric PA hypertension, BP not normalized with glucocorticoid therapy, and need for age‑specific BP targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates potential channel, integration, affiliate, or strategic partners. Use when the user provides partner profiles plus partnership goals and wants fit scoring, partnership type, and outreach priority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, run, and measure an adversary engagement operation using the MITRE Engage framework so that deployed deception is driven by strategy instead of deployed ad hoc. Covers the Engage Matrix (Prepare, Expose, Affect, Elicit, Understand), the 10-Step Operational Process, mapping engagement Activities to the ATT&CK techniques they expose, and defining measurable Goals and Operational Objectives. Use when a team has honeypots, honeytokens, or canary tokens but no coordinating strategy, when leadership asks "should we engage attackers and how", when building a deception/denial program, when writing an adversary engagement operation plan, or when deciding which deception Activities to deploy against a specific threat actor. Keywords: MITRE Engage, adversary engagement, cyber deception strategy, denial and deception, Engage Matrix, EAC, EGO, Expose Affect Elicit, deception program, honeypot strategy, engagement operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-160 Vol 1 (Engineering Trustworthy Secure Systems) and Vol 2 (Developing Cyber-Resilient Systems). Use for systems security engineering (SSE): the three SSE framework contexts (problem/solution/trustworthiness), the 30+ design principles for trustworthy secure design, trustworthiness and assurance/assurance cases, security across the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 life-cycle process groups, and the Vol 2 cyber-resiliency engineering framework — 4 goals (anticipate/withstand/recover/adapt), objectives, 14 techniques, implementation approaches, and design principles for the APT/adverse-conditions threat model. Bridges systems engineering and the NIST security cluster (CSF/SSDF/RMF). Does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text, nor cover SP 800-53 control catalogs in depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。