本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

dod-digital-engineering

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(13)

  • SKILL.md14.2 KB
  • chapters/ch01-dod-digital-engineering-introduction-purpose-vision.md8.2 KB
  • chapters/ch02-dod-digital-engineering-goal1-formalize-models.md9.0 KB
  • chapters/ch03-dod-digital-engineering-goal2-authoritative-source-of-truth.md12.2 KB
  • chapters/ch04-dod-digital-engineering-goal3-technological-innovation.md9.8 KB
  • chapters/ch05-dod-digital-engineering-goal4-infrastructure-environments.md11.0 KB
  • chapters/ch06-dod-digital-engineering-goal5-culture-workforce.md11.0 KB
  • chapters/ch07-dod-digital-engineering-next-steps-conclusion-summary.md10.9 KB
  • cheatsheet.md6.9 KB
  • glossary.md7.5 KB
  • LICENSE1.7 KB
  • PACK.yaml1.4 KB
  • patterns.md6.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- argument-hint: [digital engineering goal (1-5), focus area, authoritative source of truth, model formalisms, governance, infrastructure, culture/workforce, next steps, chapter number] -->

DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018)

Source: OUSD R&E / ODASD(SE) (US Government work, public domain) | Chapters: 7

When to use

Use this skill when you need to reason about the Department of Defense Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)) and its five goals: (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; and (5) transform the culture and workforce. This pack also covers model formalisms, provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate-plan-pilot-sustain rollout sequence. It is a vision-and-policy source, not a how-to method or tool tutorial.

Prerequisites: none, plain Markdown; no MCP server, API key, or licence tier needed at runtime.

How to Use This Skill

  • Without arguments — load the Core Frameworks below: the definition of digital engineering, the five goals, and the central mental-model shifts.
  • With a topic — ask about a goal or focus area (e.g. "authoritative source of truth", "model formalisms", "Goal 4 infrastructure", "culture and workforce"), a shift (document-to-model, model-analyze-build), or a cited example (USS Ford, A-10, ERS, NAVAIR, Army LPDM/ePDM).
  • With a chapter — ch01 (intro/vision + the five goals), ch02–ch06 (Goals 1–5), ch07 (next steps + Appendix 1 summary).
  • Read it as intent, not procedure — the Strategy is a non-prescriptive "living document"; the concrete "how" lives in DoD Component implementation plans, which this pack does not contain.

Supporting files: glossary.md, patterns.md, cheatsheet.md.

Prerequisites: none — plain Markdown; no MCP server, API key, or licence tier needed at runtime.

Core Frameworks & Mental Models

What digital engineering is

Digital engineering is an integrated digital approach that uses authoritative sources of system data and models as a continuum across disciplines to support lifecycle activities from concept through disposal. The 2018 Digital Engineering Strategy — authored by ODASD(SE) with government, industry, and academia stakeholders — is the governing document. It is deliberately a vision and a compass, not a checklist: explicitly non-prescriptive and meant to evolve, it sets shared direction while the concrete execution lives in DoD Component / Service implementation plans.

The driver is mission urgency: deliver capability to the warfighter faster amid exponential technology change, rising complexity, tight budgets, and compressed schedules — problems the legacy linear, document-heavy, stove-piped process handles poorly. The system of interest is scoped broadly: systems of systems, systems, processes, equipment, products, and parts.

The Five Digital Engineering Goals

The entire Strategy is organized around five goals (Section IV summary; each expanded into focus areas in Section V):

  1. Formalize the development, integration, and use of models — making modeling deliberate practice that informs enterprise- and program-level decisions. → ch02
  2. Provide an enduring, authoritative source of truth — move the primary means of communication from documents to digital models and data. → ch03
  3. Incorporate technological innovation to improve the engineering practice (beyond traditional model-based methods). → ch04
  4. Establish a supporting infrastructure and environments so stakeholders can perform activities, collaborate, and communicate. → ch05
  5. Transform the culture and workforce — equipping the Department to adopt digital engineering, and sustain it, across the lifecycle. → ch06

Read goals 1–4 as building the machine (models, a trusted data backbone, infused technology, the environment to run them in) and goal 5 as building the people who run it. Adoption is the gating risk.

Goal → focus-area structure

Each goal decomposes into numbered focus areas (Appendix 1 is the full map):

  • Goal 1: 1.1 plan for models · 1.2 develop/integrate/curate models · 1.3 use models in decisions.
  • Goal 2: 2.1 define the authoritative source of truth · 2.2 govern it (access, controls, governance) · 2.3 use it across the lifecycle.
  • Goal 3: 3.1 establish an end-to-end digital engineering enterprise · 3.2 use technological innovations to improve the practice.
  • Goal 4: 4.1 IT infrastructures · 4.2 methodologies · 4.3 secure infrastructure & protect IP.
  • Goal 5: 5.1 improve the knowledge base · 5.2 lead & support transformation · 5.3 build & prepare the workforce.

Key constructs

  • Authoritative source of truth (AST) — the single, trusted central reference for models and data; captures the current state and history of the technical baseline, gives traceability as the system evolves, and propagates changes downstream. Its authority comes from governance: governance → data quality → stakeholder confidence → data-driven decisions.
  • Model formalisms — the quality rules (syntax, semantics, lexicons, standards) that let independently authored models combine into one coherent digital representation.
  • Provenance and pedigree — recorded model origin and lineage that, with V&V-based reviews, make a model trustworthy and reusable. Trust is engineered, not assumed.
  • Continuum of models — the same authoritative models carried and reused concept→disposal, not rebuilt at each phase boundary.

The mental-model shifts

  • Documents → models/data as the primary means of communication; documents become generated views, and stakeholders shift from accepting documents to accepting models.
  • Design-build-test → model-analyze-build — analyze and prove decisions in a virtual environment before physical build and fielding (virtual-first).
  • Many copies → one source of truth — ask "is this traced from the AST?" not "which copy is current?"
  • Stove-piped IT → a consolidated, collaborative, trusted environment (Goal 4's diagnosis and target).
  • Lock-in → standards & interfaces — bet on the seams between tools (standards, data, formats, interfaces), not a vendor product.
  • One-time rollout → sustained socio-technical change — culture is the operating system (Goal 5).

Rollout: coordinate → plan → pilot → sustain

The Strategy sequences four next steps: coordinate (ODASD(SE) convenes a summit and runs the standing Digital Engineering Working Group), develop implementation plans (owned by the DoD Components), implement pilot programs (learn/measure/optimize before scaling into major programs), and sustain (policy, guidance, training, continuous improvement). Ownership is distributed (Components own plans); coordination is central (ODASD(SE) is a gap-closer, not a gatekeeper).


Chapter Index

#SectionKey content
ch01Introduction, Purpose & VisionWhat digital engineering is; why now; the five goals introduced; the non-prescriptive "living document"; design-build-test→model-analyze-build; system of interest
ch02Goal 1 — Formalize ModelsPlan/develop/use models (1.1–1.3); model formalisms; provenance & pedigree; model-based reviews; the authoritative source of truth foundation; USS Ford example
ch03Goal 2 — Authoritative Source of TruthDefine/govern/use the AST (2.1–2.3); governance, access & controls; technical baseline; document-to-model acceptance shift; Army LPDM/ePDM example
ch04Goal 3 — Technological InnovationEnd-to-end digital enterprise (3.1); use of data, human-machine interaction, technology insertion (3.2); evolving digital representation; A-10 digital thread
ch05Goal 4 — Infrastructure & EnvironmentsIT infrastructure (4.1); methodologies (4.2); cybersecurity & IP protection (4.3); standards-over-tools; modular/cloud; ERS example
ch06Goal 5 — Culture & WorkforceCulture as shared values/behaviors; knowledge base & standards gap (5.1); transformation as change management (5.2); preparing the workforce (5.3); enablers; NAVAIR example
ch07Next Steps & Appendix 1Coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain; ODASD(SE) coordination & DoD Components; DEWG; the goal/focus-area summary table

Topic Index

  • A-10 example / digital thread → ch04
  • Access and controls → ch03
  • Appendix 1 (goal/focus-area summary) → ch07
  • Authoritative source of truth (AST) → ch03, ch02
  • Continuum of models → ch02, ch01
  • Culture (shared values and behaviors) → ch06
  • Cybersecurity (in digital engineering) → ch05
  • Define / govern / use the AST (2.1–2.3) → ch03
  • Design-build-test → model-analyze-build → ch01
  • Digital artifacts → ch03
  • Digital engineering (definition) → ch01
  • Digital Engineering Strategy (2018) → ch01, ch07
  • Digital Engineering Working Group (DEWG) → ch07
  • Document-to-model shift → ch03
  • End-to-end digital enterprise → ch04, ch01
  • Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS) → ch05
  • Evolving digital representation → ch04
  • Five goals (summary) → ch01, ch07
  • Focus areas (structure) → ch07
  • Formalize models (Goal 1) → ch02
  • Governance (of the AST) → ch03
  • Human-machine interaction → ch04
  • Infrastructure and environments (Goal 4) → ch05
  • Intellectual property protection → ch05
  • LPDM / ePDM (Army example) → ch03
  • Methodologies (Goal 4.2) → ch05
  • Model formalisms (syntax/semantics/lexicons) → ch02
  • Model provenance and pedigree → ch02
  • Model-based reviews and audits → ch02
  • NAVAIR SE Transformation → ch06
  • Next steps (coordinate/plan/pilot/sustain) → ch07
  • ODASD(SE) / DoD Components → ch07, ch01
  • Pilot programs → ch07
  • Standards and interfaces (over tools) → ch05
  • System of interest → ch01
  • Technical baseline → ch03
  • Technological innovation (Goal 3) → ch04
  • Technology insertion / infusion → ch04
  • Transformation as change management → ch06
  • USS Ford (CVN-78) example → ch02
  • Workforce (build and prepare) → ch06

Supporting Files

  • glossary.md — key terms from the Strategy, alphabetical, with chapter references
  • patterns.md — practitioner patterns (plan models first, engineer model trust, define→govern→use the AST, open-but-guarded access, standards-over-tools, managed technology infusion, transform the people, pilot before scaling) with When/How/Trade-offs
  • cheatsheet.md — decision rules, the five goals, goal→focus-area map, the mental-model shifts, the four next steps, cited examples, tells & smells

Scope & Limits

Covers: the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018) in full — the definition and vision of digital engineering; the five goals and their focus areas; the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts; model formalisms, provenance/pedigree, and model-based reviews; the authoritative source of truth (define/govern/use, governance, access control, technical baseline); the end-to-end digital enterprise, data-driven decisions, human-machine interaction, and technology insertion; supporting infrastructure, methodologies, cybersecurity, and IP protection; the culture/workforce transformation and its enablers; and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout with its cited Service examples (USS Ford, Army LPDM/ePDM, A-10, ERS, NAVAIR).

Does not cover: this is a vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive — it provides no step-by-step method, tool tutorials, or implementation procedure. It is thin on quantitative metrics, detailed acquisition-policy mechanics, and the contents of DoD Component implementation plans (which it points to but does not contain). For MBSE/SysML mechanics use the sebok pack and SysML v2 / Cameo tooling; for SE process detail use dau-se-guidebook; for systems-security-engineering depth use nist-sse; for open/modular architecture see dod-mosa. The CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK) is intentionally excluded (not public).

Source version: DoD Digital Engineering Strategy, OUSD R&E / ODASD(SE), June 2018 (Distribution Statement A — approved for public release; distribution unlimited).

Jurisdiction: US Government public-domain work (17 U.S.C. 105). Freely reproducible, including commercially; attribution to the DoD is a courtesy, not an obligation, and the DoD does not endorse this pack.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the automotive standards landscape: ISO 26262, ASPICE, SAE J3016, UNECE R155, UNECE R156, and the NHTSA vehicle set. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate an automotive standard. Most are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; the one open path is the nhtsa-vehicle pack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

cisa-cpg

無料

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

dod-mosa

無料

Knowledge base from the OUSD(R&E) guidebook Implementing a MOSA in DoD Programs (Feb 2025). Use for the Modular Open Systems Approach as a DoD acquisition + design discipline: the statutory/regulatory basis (10 U.S.C. 4401–4403, FY2017/FY2021 NDAA, DFARS), the five OUSD(R&E) pillars, the plan→modularize→identify→define→standardize interface lifecycle, technical levers (WBS/MIL-STD-881F taxonomy, standards profiling, API-first software, COTS/cybersecurity), MOSA assessment metrics and tools (PART/OAAT/KOSS/SEAM/MAUT), technology-change and DMSMS management, roadmaps, MOSA across the six AAF pathways, and contracting/IP/data-rights mechanics. SCOPE LIMITS: this is U.S. DoD weapon-system acquisition policy, not a general open-architecture or interface-standards reference — it names standards (FACE, OMS, DISR) without reproducing them, is light on detailed engineering of any specific standard, and does not cover the underlying SE processes (use dau-se-guidebook / nasa-npr-7123) or general systems-engineering theory (use sebok).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

jgsystemsconsulting のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する