本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

dafman-63-119

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(13)

  • SKILL.md6.7 KB
  • chapters/ch01-motrc-framework-and-applicability.md4.6 KB
  • chapters/ch02-roles-and-certification-official.md4.3 KB
  • chapters/ch03-continuous-process-and-review-cycle.md5.8 KB
  • chapters/ch04-certification-memo-and-gates.md3.7 KB
  • chapters/ch05-dte-and-contractor-testing.md3.8 KB
  • chapters/ch06-integration-itt-and-cyber.md3.4 KB
  • chapters/ch07-templates-documentation-and-tracking.md3.8 KB
  • cheatsheet.md2.5 KB
  • glossary.md2.3 KB
  • LICENSE1.2 KB
  • PACK.yaml1.6 KB
  • patterns.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- argument-hint: [MOTRC, certification official, ITT, TEMP, DT sufficiency, contractor test, cyber resiliency, memo, template, or chapter number] -->

DAFMAN 63-119 — Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification

Source: DAFMAN 63-119, 15 April 2021 (US Government work, public domain; no releasability restrictions) | Chapters: 7

When to use

Use this pack when planning or running Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification for DAF (USAF/USSF) programs—standing up the continuous process that replaced OTRR-centric thinking, assigning the Certification Official, driving template-based reviews, writing the certification memorandum, treating DT/contractor/integrated-test evidence, and folding cyber resiliency and industry/supplier test obligations into OT readiness.

Prerequisites: none — plain Markdown; no MCP server, API key, or licence tier needed at runtime. Pair with dote-te-guidebook / dod-te-guidebook for enterprise T&E context and DoDI 5000.89 framing.

How to Use This Skill

  • Without arguments — load the core frameworks below.
  • With a topic — ask about MOTRC vs OTRR, Certification Official rules, review cycles, memos, DT sufficiency, contractor testing, ITT integration, cyber, or templates.
  • With a chapter — ask for ch01 through ch07.

Supporting files: glossary.md, patterns.md, cheatsheet.md.

Core Frameworks & Mental Models

Continuous MOTRC (not a single OTRR)

DAF replaced OTRR-as-the-main-event with a continuous mission-oriented certification process from early development through dedicated OT, backed by 31 templates (Attachments 2–32) and mandatory through testing to operational acceptance.

Certification Official independence

Program typeTypical Certification OfficialPM may self-certify?
ACAT I MDAPSAF/AQ (MDA) or delegated PEONo
ACAT II / OSD oversightPEO (as assigned)No
OthersAs designated in TEMP/strategyFollow designation; still separate judgment

Review cycle loop

Pre-cert reviews → candid assessment vs exit criteria → negotiate workarounds/limits → report (DT report + executive brief) → memo → OTO acknowledge → (optional) decertify/recertify.

Evidence triangle

  1. DT & contractor test sufficiency and representativeness
  2. Integrated test data with argued OT credit
  3. OT plan entrance/exit criteria and resources

Template matrix (three groups)

  • Planning & documentation (strategy, requirements, TEMP, ITT, …)
  • Design & performance (cyber, CT, DT, software, CM, deficiencies, OT plan, …)
  • Assets & support (training, SE, spares, agreements, PHS&T, personnel, tech data, T&E resources)

Integration & supplier lens

ITT co-chairs (CDT/TM + OTO) orchestrate; contractor/supplier data rights and test support are certification inputs, not optional annexes.

Chapter Index

#SectionKey content
ch01MOTRC Framework and ApplicabilityContinuous process, scope, DT sufficiency & OT adequacy hooks
ch02Roles and Certification OfficialSAF/AQ, AF/TE, PEO, PM, CDT, OTO, LDTO, ITT
ch03Continuous Process and Review CycleTailoring, cyber thread, assessment, negotiation, reporting
ch04Certification Memo and GatesMemo content, acknowledge, decertify/recertify
ch05DT&E and Contractor TestingSufficiency, CT oversight, articles, evidence
ch06Integration, ITT, and CyberITT engine, TEMP/plans, cyber, supplier interfaces
ch07Templates, Documentation, TrackingMatrix structure, OPRs, TEMP Part III, tool

Topic Index

  • ACAT / MDA / PEO certification authority → ch02, ch04
  • AFOTEC / MAJCOM OTO / USSF OTO → ch02
  • Agile / software pathway / DevSecOps test → ch01, ch03, ch04
  • Certification memorandum → ch04
  • Certification Official (vs former OT&E Certification Official) → ch02
  • Contractor testing / supplier data → ch05, ch06, ch07
  • Cyber resiliency / MBCRA / MRAP-C → ch03, ch06
  • Decertification / recertification / pause → ch04
  • Dedicated OT / FRP / deployment decision → ch01, ch04
  • Deficiency resolution → ch03, ch05, ch07
  • DT&E sufficiency (MS B / MS C) → ch01, ch05
  • Exit criteria / get-well plans → ch03, ch04
  • Integrated Test Team (ITT) → ch02, ch06
  • Integrated testing / OT credit → ch01, ch03, ch05
  • LDTO / CDT / Test Manager → ch02, ch05
  • Lead operating command / requirements → ch02
  • Multi-service lead rules → ch01, ch06
  • OT adequacy / DOT&E → ch01, ch05
  • OTRR replacement / continuous evaluation → ch01
  • Production- / operational-representative articles → ch01, ch05
  • Safety release → ch02, ch05
  • TEMP Part III certification strategy → ch02, ch07
  • Template matrix / Attachments 2–32 → ch03, ch07
  • Tracking tool (AF/TE) → ch07
  • Urgent / prototype / JCTD tailoring → ch01

Supporting Files


Scope & Limits

This pack covers DAFMAN 63-119, 15 April 2021 — Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification — as synthesized reference notes (103 pages per source title page / reader metadata). It does not cover: full text of DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, AFMAN 63-144, or the detailed line-item content of every certification template attachment; service-specific classified/CUI procedures; or non-DAF lead-service certification manuals. Supersedes AFMAN 63-119, 26 April 2019. US Government public domain work; title-page releasability: no releasability restrictions. No source-material download link is published.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the automotive standards landscape: ISO 26262, ASPICE, SAE J3016, UNECE R155, UNECE R156, and the NHTSA vehicle set. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate an automotive standard. Most are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; the one open path is the nhtsa-vehicle pack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

cisa-cpg

無料

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

dod-mosa

無料

Knowledge base from the OUSD(R&E) guidebook Implementing a MOSA in DoD Programs (Feb 2025). Use for the Modular Open Systems Approach as a DoD acquisition + design discipline: the statutory/regulatory basis (10 U.S.C. 4401–4403, FY2017/FY2021 NDAA, DFARS), the five OUSD(R&E) pillars, the plan→modularize→identify→define→standardize interface lifecycle, technical levers (WBS/MIL-STD-881F taxonomy, standards profiling, API-first software, COTS/cybersecurity), MOSA assessment metrics and tools (PART/OAAT/KOSS/SEAM/MAUT), technology-change and DMSMS management, roadmaps, MOSA across the six AAF pathways, and contracting/IP/data-rights mechanics. SCOPE LIMITS: this is U.S. DoD weapon-system acquisition policy, not a general open-architecture or interface-standards reference — it names standards (FACE, OMS, DISR) without reproducing them, is light on detailed engineering of any specific standard, and does not cover the underlying SE processes (use dau-se-guidebook / nasa-npr-7123) or general systems-engineering theory (use sebok).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

jgsystemsconsulting のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する