「inline」の検索結果

Review PR comments from GitHub. Fetches inline review comments and issue comments, classifies by blocking vs non-blocking, and summarizes actionable items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symfony UX LiveComponent for reactive server-rendered UI -- components that re-render via AJAX on user interaction, zero JavaScript required. Use when building live search, real-time filtering, dynamic forms, inline validation, dependent selects, auto-save, polling, deferred/lazy rendering, or any UI that updates itself based on user input. Code triggers: AsLiveComponent, LiveProp, LiveAction, data-model, data-loading, data-live-action-url, ComponentWithFormTrait, LiveListener, emit, defer, lazy, polling. Also trigger when the user asks "how to build a search that filters as I type", "how to validate a form in real-time", "how to make a reactive component in PHP", "how to build dependent selects", "how to defer component rendering", "how to communicate between components via emit", "how to bind a form to a LiveComponent". Do NOT trigger for static reusable UI without reactivity (use twig-component), pure client-side JS behavior (use stimulus), or page-level navigation (use turbo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and maintain high-quality Swift DocC documentation for the TMDb package, following its established `///` conventions. Use when adding or changing any public declaration (protocol, class, struct, enum, actor, model, property, initializer, method, typealias) and when keeping the DocC catalog in sync. This is the single source of truth for the project's documentation style — applied inline as you write, and followed by the `documentation-writer` agent for bulk sweeps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Let AKA autonomously add, run, inspect, and revise intra-kernel timeline probes for standalone CUDA/inline PTX or CuTe DSL when ordinary benchmark, NSYS, or NCU evidence cannot answer a specific kernel-internal timing question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and manage databases with Drizzle Studio. Use when a user asks to browse database contents visually, inspect tables and data, run ad-hoc queries, manage database records through a GUI, debug database issues, or use a lightweight alternative to pgAdmin or DBeaver. Covers setup with Drizzle ORM, standalone usage, data browsing, filtering, and inline editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in Ethereum Virtual Machine internals - gas optimization, assembly/Yul, opcode-level optimization, and low-level EVM patternsUse when "evm, gas optimization, yul, inline assembly, opcodes, solidity optimization, evm bytecode, storage layout, evm, ethereum, solidity, yul, assembly, gas-optimization, opcodes, smart-contracts" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate technical architecture diagrams, pipeline flows, layer/stack diagrams, and system illustrations as standalone HTML files. Uses a dark-mode design system with embedded CSS and inline SVG. Use when the user needs architecture diagrams, system illustrations, flow charts, or technical visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill-aware orchestration with context routing. Decomposes complex tasks into skill-typed subtasks, extracts targeted context subsets, executes subagents in parallel, and synthesizes results. Self-answers trivial lookups inline. No SDK dependency — uses raw HTTP via httpx. Use when tasks require multiple analytical perspectives, when context is large and subtasks only need portions, or when orchestrating-chat-agents spawns too many redundant subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create interactive data visualizations using Vega-Lite declarative JSON grammar. Supports 20+ chart types (bar, line, scatter, histogram, boxplot, grouped/stacked variations, etc.) via templates and programmatic builders. Use when users upload data for charting, request specific chart types, or mention visualizations. Produces portable JSON specs with inline data islands that work in Claude artifacts and can be adapted for production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and maintain AI-readable markdown documentation for a codebase in docs/. Use this skill whenever the user asks to document their codebase, generate project docs, create architecture docs, update documentation after code changes, build a knowledge base for AI agents, create onboarding docs, map out a codebase, or explain a project structure. Also trigger when users say things like "document this repo", "create docs for my project", "update the docs", "write architecture documentation", "help AI understand my code", "generate a codebase overview", or "maintain docs". This skill is specifically about creating structured markdown files in a docs/ directory that serve as a knowledge base — NOT about writing inline code comments, README files, or API reference docs from docstrings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about code, architecture, and technical decisions — no implementation. Trigger on questions asking 'why', 'what does this do', 'what is the purpose of', 'explain', 'what's the difference', 'compare', or 'what are the tradeoffs' — even when referencing specific files, code snippets, or inline code. The key signal is the user wants to UNDERSTAND something, not change it. Do NOT trigger for requests to build, fix, plan, review, research, or add/modify code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite existing text so it stops sounding AI-generated. Triggers on "humanize this", "un-ChatGPT it", "doesn't scream LLM", "strip the AI voice", or naming specific AI tells (em dashes, "it's not just X it's Y", "stands as a testament", "thrilled to announce", emoji-headed bullets, LinkedIn cringe). Works on any draft — blog posts, memos, READMEs, essays, PR descriptions — inline or in files. Keeps facts; changes voice. Do NOT use for writing new content, summarizing, translating, or pure-explanation requests with no draft to rewrite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative review-fix loop for the current branch — reviews via daemon, fixes inline, re-reviews until passing or max iterations reached

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data-model rules that make a schema importable from day one, so the migration-import-engineer is never blocked on missing columns. Every SMB Product-Builder product must let a customer bring their data from an incumbent (ServiceTitan/Toast/Mindbody/Shopify) — that requires provenance (source_ref) and rollback (import_batch_id) on importable entities, and modelling real-world actors as entities rather than inline fields. Applied by architect when writing the data model in ARCH-{slug}.md, and checked by migration-import-engineer. One cheap rule set prevents the migration↔architecture seam gap from recurring across all 40 products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[BETA] Offload plan phase to Claude Code's ultraplan cloud — drafts remotely while terminal stays free, review in browser with inline comments, import back via /gsd:import. Claude Code only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a trivial task inline — no subagents, no planning overhead

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the follow-up to brainstorm-beagle when a spec has an Open Questions section (or quietly carries latent gaps) that need closing before planning or implementation can begin. Triggers on: "resolve the open questions", "close the gaps in this spec", "research the open items", "finalize my spec", "make this spec implementation-ready", "answer the TBDs". Also triggers whenever the user points at a brainstorm-beagle spec and asks for research, proposals, or answers to unresolved items. Orchestrates parallel research subagents when available (falls back to inline sequential research otherwise), proposes answers one at a time for user approval, then rewrites the spec in place so it arrives at planning with no known gaps. Does NOT write code, design implementation, or create plans — it only produces a complete spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test PydanticAI agents using TestModel, FunctionModel, VCR cassettes, and inline snapshots. Use when writing unit tests, mocking LLM responses, or recording API interactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toasts, inline errors, banners and recovery paths. Use when designing error states, success confirmations, async feedback or in-place editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a skillsaw PR. Dispatches 7 specialist reviewers (Architecture, Python Expert, Security & Supply Chain, QA Engineer, Technical Writer, Ecosystem, Slopinator) as parallel sub-agents by default, then synthesizes a single verdict. Use --serial for cheaper inline execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。