「methodology」の検索結果

Design a usability study — research questions, methodology, participant criteria, metrics, and facilitation guide. Use when planning the study as a whole. For writing the task scenarios inside it, use `test-scenario` (prototyping-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FAIR-aligned exposure quantification: turns a pile of recon findings into a defensible 0-100 + A-F org risk score (Likelihood x Impact, three ownership-aware factors: exposure/threat/impact), an ownership + proof demotion cap so unproven or weakly-owned findings can't inflate the number, a $-denominated FAIR loss-magnitude estimate (IBM/Ponemon per-record cost bands, cross-source record dedup, threat-factor annualization), attack-path amplification (curated red-team chain catalog + generic graph-walk engine, with a kill-chain vs shared-fate honesty gate), and a board-ready one-pager deliverable (hero $ + letter grade + top-3 findings + top attack path + the ask). Extends osint-methodology's severity rubric and client deliverable templates with quantification. Passive analysis only -- operates on findings already collected, no target traffic, no API keys. Use when asked to score risk, quantify exposure, estimate breach cost, build a board report, translate technical findings to dollars, or explain why a grade or dollar figure came out the way it did.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end external OSINT engagement autopilot. Run the FULL osint-methodology pipeline to completion in ONE go for an authorized domain — engagement folder, Stages 1-5 (seed, expansion, enrichment, exposure, convergence), multi-agent per-host content+JS fan-out, headline verification, auto-generated findings, and a consolidated multi-tab .xlsx deliverable. Stops ONLY for Stage 6 (active exploitation) arming and out-of-scope sibling assets. Use whenever asked to "run OSINT / recon / attack-surface" on a target — do NOT deliver a thin passive first pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry P1 category router for reconnaissance and methodology. Use when mapping scope, drawing an attack surface from one application, discovering assets, fingerprinting technology, building endpoint inventory, and choosing the first high-value security testing path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WAF bypass methodology and generic evasion techniques. Use when a web application firewall blocks injection payloads (SQLi, XSS, RCE) and you need to craft bypasses using encoding, protocol-level tricks, or WAF-specific weaknesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build quiz and assessment funnels that generate qualified leads at 30-50% conversion. Use when the user mentions "quiz funnel", "scorecard", "lead magnet", "score-based segmentation", or "lead qualification". Also trigger when designing self-assessment tools, building calculators or graders for marketing, or creating personalized result pages that drive conversions. Covers concept hooks, question design, dynamic results by tier, and automated follow-up sequences. For landing page conversion, see cro-methodology. For full marketing plans, see one-page-marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and improve interface usability using heuristic analysis. Use when the user mentions "usability audit", "users are confused", "form usability", "navigation problems", "Nielsen heuristics", "cognitive walkthrough", or "is this easy to use". Also trigger when reviewing a design for usability issues, improving form-completion rates, or evaluating information architecture and navigation. Covers Krug's laws, Nielsen's 10 heuristics, severity ratings, dark-pattern recognition, and accessibility. For visual design fixes, see refactoring-ui. For conversion-focused audits, see cro-methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a live website that underperforms to a prioritized, evidence-backed backlog of conversion, usability, message, and speed fixes - each shipped as a testable experiment. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - cro-methodology, ux-heuristics, refactoring-ui, web-typography, storybrand-messaging, high-perf-browser, made-to-stick, design-everyday-things - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (WEBSITE.md, DESIGN.md, IMPROVE-WEBSITE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to fix a landing page that isn't converting, diagnose why visitors leave, audit for clarity and usability, or says 'the homepage feels off but a redesign didn't help'. No site yet, create-website; converts but needs traffic, grow-website; if the friction is in a product app, not the marketing site, improve-app; if one specific flow leaks, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a blank page to a live, high-converting website, built message-first, then design, then conversion. Orchestrates ten skills phase by phase - one-page-marketing, storybrand-messaging, made-to-stick, top-design, web-typography, refactoring-ui, ux-heuristics, cro-methodology, scorecard-marketing, steve-jobs-design-review - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (POSITIONING.md, WEBSITE.md, CREATE-WEBSITE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to build a new website or landing page from scratch, turn a validated idea into a page that converts, or says 'build me a landing page for my SaaS'. Site already exists: use improve-website site-wide, conversion-optimization for one flow, or grow-website for traffic; building a software product, not a marketing site: create-app; no positioning yet: create-business first, or the positioning phase here. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a complete marketing plan covering the full customer journey from stranger to raving fan. Use when the user mentions "marketing plan", "marketing strategy", "target market", "USP", "lead nurture", "customer lifetime value", "PVP Index", or "I dont know where to start with marketing". Also trigger when building a marketing plan from scratch, choosing acquisition channels, or designing end-to-end customer-lifecycle campaigns. Covers the PVP Index, channel selection, and advocacy systems. For brand messaging, see storybrand-messaging. For conversion optimization, see cro-methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a leaking conversion flow - landing page, signup, checkout, or in-app onboarding - to a measured, tested funnel. Orchestrates six skills phase by phase - lean-analytics, cro-methodology, storybrand-messaging, hundred-million-offers, influence-psychology, design-everyday-things - each phase carries its full method inline so it runs standalone, asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (FUNNEL.md, METRICS.md, EXPERIMENTS.md, CONVERSION-OPTIMIZATION-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to raise conversion on a specific flow, fix checkout or signup abandonment, diagnose onboarding drop-off, or says 'people start but never finish'. With no site yet, use create-website; for a whole-site look, message, and speed audit, improve-website; if the flow converts but needs traffic, grow-website; for in-product engagement and retention, improve-app. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit websites and landing pages for conversion issues and design evidence-based A/B tests. Use when the user mentions "landing page isnt converting", "conversion rate", "A/B test", "why visitors leave", "objection handling", "bounce rate", "conversion funnel", "increase signups", or "people add to cart but dont buy". Also trigger when diagnosing why signups are low, designing experiment hypotheses, or auditing checkout flows for friction points. Covers funnel mapping, persuasion assets, and objection/counter-objection frameworks. For overall marketing strategy, see one-page-marketing. For usability issues, see ux-heuristics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a website with traffic it under-converts to a research-driven growth engine that captures more leads, persuades more buyers, sells a sharper offer, and earns referrals. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - cro-methodology, scorecard-marketing, storybrand-messaging, made-to-stick, influence-psychology, hundred-million-offers, contagious, one-page-marketing - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (WEBSITE.md, OFFER.md, MARKETING.md, GROW-WEBSITE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to raise conversion on a site that already has traffic, capture more leads, sharpen a weak offer, add referral loops, or says 'my site gets visitors but nobody buys'. If a broken funnel or usability friction is the real blocker, run improve-website first; if there is no site yet, use create-website; for one leaking flow, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end methodology for reproducing AND patching publicly disclosed, already-fixed vulnerabilities: sourcing the advisory and the fix commit, reading the patch diff, rebuilding a pinned offline lab, building a vulnerable-vs-patched contrast harness with proper controls, minimizing the trigger, designing and validating the fix, and writing it up as a blog post or whitepaper. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, understand, teach, or write about a known vulnerability or security incident: "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "how did EchoLeak / Log4Shell / the postmark-mcp package actually work", "show me how this exploit worked", "write a blog post about this vulnerability", "set up a lab for CVE-XXXX", "pull the NVD/CVE/OSV details", or "make a PoC I can publish". Use it just as eagerly for the patching half: "how should this be fixed", "is this patch correct", "what would have caught this", "review this security fix", "write a regression test for this CVE", "how do I backport this", or "what's the right fix for this bug class" - even when the user never says the word "reproduce". Reach for it on vague asks like "help me understand this security advisory", "I want to write about this incident", or "can we test whether we were vulnerable" when a disclosed vulnerability is in play. This skill only handles ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed issues and refuses zero-day discovery, live targets, and weaponization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework-agnostic methodology for migrating a plugin, extension, or integration across a breaking upstream release — inventory coupling points, classify changes, stage the migration, and verify in layers. Use when upgrading any plugin from one host-framework version to another without access to framework-specific migration notes. Not a substitute for vendor release notes; contains no framework-specific facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create professional presentations using the Pyramid Principle methodology. Supports PPTX generation, Marp/Reveal.js Markdown slides, chart creation, speaker notes, and self-evaluation rubrics. Minimal intake form to rapid output workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Django testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factory_boy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks the latest preprints and emerging research topics related to your topic across bioRxiv, medRxiv, and arXiv. Use when a user wants to discover what is being published right now before it reaches journals, monitor competitor directions, spot new methodology trends, or get an early-warning scan of a research area. Triggers on phrases like "what's new in X", "latest preprints on Y", "emerging topics in Z", "monitor bioRxiv for", or "what are people working on in this field".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design any process, idea, problem, or body of knowledge into an ICM (Interpretable Context Methodology) workspace — folder structure as agent architecture — or restructure an existing folder, repo, or vault into one. Use when the user wants to (1) turn a recurring workflow into an agent-runnable folder pipeline, (2) organize scattered notes, files, or knowledge into a library one AI agent can walk, (3) map a team or company as connected context ("context map", "second brain", "team brain", "knowledge base for AI"), (4) audit a codebase or mixed folder into a walkable edit map (objects, processes, change-impact) so later agents can change it without slurping the tree, (5) audit or restructure an existing workspace to ICM conventions, or (6) says "make this an ICM", "ICM this", "map this repo", "audit this folder", "what would a change hit", "build me a workspace", or "structure this for agents".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured debugging methodology using hypothesis-driven investigation, log analysis, and bisection to isolate and resolve defects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specification creation and management for the Pilot Shell methodology. Covers semantic search, clarifying questions, structured spec generation, and iterative refinement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git commit patterns, formats, and conventions for GSD methodology. Provides atomic commits per task, structured commit messages, planning file commits, branch management, and milestone tag operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。