「multi-step」の検索結果

Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before committing any non-trivial change, dispatch the diff to a reviewer runtime via ATO (`ato dispatch <reviewer> --session <id>`), parse the numbered/severity-tagged findings, apply or defer each one with a recorded justification, then commit. Fights the "build passes therefore ship it" failure mode — what Garry Tan calls the AI agent complexity ratchet. Place in the v2.16 stack: this skill is the LAST gate. `ato-warroom` decides the design; `ato-mission` runs the multi-step work and produces the diff; `ato-review` checks the diff before commit. When the review is part of a Mission, dispatch the review with `--require-tools read_file,grep,git_diff,git_log` so the reviewer can walk the source itself instead of reasoning from a paraphrase (PR-1.5 tool surface). Receipts land in `execution_logs` and the Mission narrative. Fires automatically before commits touching public surface (CLI subcommands, Tauri commands, MCP tools, schema migrations, security boundaries) or whenever a diff exceeds ~50 LOC of behavior change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track multi-step work with todo, plan mode, kanban and missions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build type-safe validated forms using React Hook Form v7 and Zod v4. Single schema works on client and server with full TypeScript inference via z.infer. Use when building forms, multi-step wizards, or fixing uncontrolled warnings, resolver errors, useFieldArray issues, performance problems with large forms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call Exa Search (POST /search) for semantic web retrieval with ranked results, filters, freshness, highlights/text, structured output, or streaming. Use when the agent needs open-ended web search, competitor discovery, news, people, or research papers and does not already have URLs. Prefer Exa MCP web_search_exa / web_search_advanced_exa when available; otherwise raw HTTP with EXA_API_KEY. NOT for known-URL extraction (use exa-contents or firecrawl) or multi-step list-building (use company-research / lead-generation / Agent API).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with the @upstash/workflow TypeScript/JavaScript SDK for durable, long-running workflows in serverless functions, multi-step processes that survive timeouts, retries, and restarts (built on QStash). Use when defining a workflow endpoint with serve(), running steps with context.run, sleeping for minutes to days without holding a function open, calling external APIs with context.call, waiting for an external event or webhook, invoking other workflows, configuring retries, failure callbacks, and a DLQ, controlling concurrency, rate, and parallelism, triggering, cancelling, or inspecting runs with the Workflow client, building AI agents and orchestrators, human-in-the-loop approvals, realtime updates, local development with the QStash dev server, adding middleware, or migrating workflows safely. Also use when the user asks for durable execution, step functions, saga or orchestration patterns, background jobs with checkpoints, or long-running tasks on Vercel, Next.js, Cloudflare Workers, or other serverless platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI prompt chains and multi-step workflows for complex tasks. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-chain-builder related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design multi-step AI agent architectures with tools, memory, and orchestration. TRIGGERS - Use when user wants to design AI agents, multi-agent systems, or autonomous AI workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for code generation, feature work, bug fixes, refactoring, and code review when a change creates or reshapes a multi-step flow, state lifecycle, side-effect or decision ownership, cross-unit composition, or boundary contract. Also use it when an existing structural problem makes those elements hard to trace or verify. Structural change is optional. Mechanical edits, throwaway experiments, and coherent local changes stay with their current owner and focused verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code or producing output. Turns a design into bite-sized, copy-pasteable tasks with exact paths and complete code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Control and interact with a live browser session on any scraped page — click buttons, fill forms, navigate flows, and extract data using natural language prompts or code. Use when the user needs to interact with a webpage beyond simple scraping: logging into a site, submitting forms, clicking through pagination, handling infinite scroll, navigating multi-step checkout or wizard flows, or when a regular scrape failed because content is behind JavaScript interaction. Also useful for authenticated scraping via profiles. Triggers on "interact", "click", "fill out the form", "log in to", "sign in", "submit", "paginated", "next page", "infinite scroll", "interact with the page", "navigate to", "open a session", or "scrape failed".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-step content production pipeline that takes a topic or brief and produces a full blog post, email newsletter excerpt, and three social posts — all in your voice. Useful for building a content batch, when repurposing a core idea across formats, during content sprint sessions, and for turning expertise into publishable material. Use when the user says "create content", "content pipeline", "blog to social", "write and repurpose", "content engine", or "create a blog post and social posts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agentic workflow patterns for autonomous LLM reasoning. Use when building ReAct agents, implementing reasoning loops, or creating LLMs that plan and execute multi-step tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill mechanisms (4) ask about Claude Code, Cursor, or similar agent internals (5) want to build agents for business, research, creative, or operational tasks Keywords: agent, assistant, autonomous, workflow, tool use, multi-step, orchestration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute an existing implementation plan or settled multi-step request through connected slices with targeted checks and controlled plan drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an implementation plan sized to settled work. Use when a multi-step change benefits from sequencing, file targets, and explicit verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application-level business logic security testing for any domain. Takes an understanding-first approach: map the intended workflows before probing them. Covers: value/quantity logic abuse (negative, zero, overflow, rounding on any numeric field), workflow and state machine bypass (skipping required steps, forcing illegal state transitions, reusing one-time tokens), trust boundary violations (BOLA horizontal/vertical, BFLA, cross-tenant access, negative ownership attacks), idempotency and replay attacks (duplicate submissions, double-spend, same-reference reuse), multi-step flow integrity (checkout, registration, approval, verification), quota and rate limit bypass, time/date manipulation, and authorization code / reference number predictability. Domain-agnostic — applies to SaaS, e-commerce, banking, gaming, social platforms, APIs, or any multi-user application with stateful workflows. Chains from /pentester; chains into /param-fuzz when boundary violations or mass assignment are confirmed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry P1 category router for business logic testing. Use when workflow abuse, race conditions, pricing flaws, or multi-step state attacks matter more than parser-level input injection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business logic flaws are application vulnerabilities where valid functions are abused in unintended ways: price manipulation via hidden field tampering, workflow step-skipping, function call limit bypass (coupon reuse), process timing exploitation (race conditions on balance updates), and request forging via guessable/predictable parameters. Detect using Burp Suite proxy interception, HTTP POST/GET parameter analysis, and misuse-case testing against multi-step workflows. Tools: Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business logic vulnerability playbook. Use when reasoning about workflows, race conditions, price manipulation, coupon abuse, state machines, and multi-step authorization gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit flaws in the core business rules and logic of web applications. This skill focuses on manipulation of application workflows, pricing, inventory limitations, and multi-step processes. Use this skill when bug hunting or testing e-commerce, banking, or SaaS platforms where standard technical vulnerabilities (e.g., XSS/SQLi) are not present but the application's logic is flawed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。