「process design」の検索結果

Use when designing or reasoning about an Agentforce Grid worksheet — the spreadsheet-like Agentforce workspace where rows are jobs and columns are sequential Data / AI / Action steps that process left to right — to run bulk record updates, generate insights, or test multi-turn AI conversations over CRM or Data Cloud (Data 360) data without Apex or Flow. Trigger keywords: Agentforce Grid, workbook, worksheet, grid column, data column, AI column, action column, bulk AI update, Flex Credits per row, metered compute. NOT for building the agent, its topics, or its actions themselves (use agentforce/* action and topic skills), NOT for single-record prompt design (use the prompt-builder skills), NOT for deployable metadata/Apex (Grid is a no-code Studio tool, not a metadata type), and NOT for AI governance/ethics policy (use admin/ai-ethics-and-governance-requirements).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, mapping, or troubleshooting the end-to-end quote-to-cash process in orgs running Salesforce CPQ (managed package) or Revenue Cloud — covering the full object chain from SBQQ__Quote__c through Contract to blng__Invoice__c, approval routing via Advanced Approvals (sbaa__), billing schedule generation, and order activation. Trigger keywords: CPQ quote, SBQQ, revenue cloud billing, Advanced Approvals, subscription, blng invoice, contract pivot. NOT for quote-to-cash on standard Sales Cloud objects — use admin/quote-to-cash-requirements. NOT for setting up SBAA approval rules and chains — use admin/cpq-approval-workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, auditing, or simplifying Record Types and Page Layouts. Triggers: 'record type', 'page layout', 'different picklist values', 'different fields per team', 'dynamic forms', 'business process', 'recordTypeVisibilities', 'layoutAssignments', 'record type deploy failed', 'businessProcess required', 'layout assignment matrix'. NOT for layout explosion across many profiles — use admin/record-type-strategy-at-scale. NOT for sharing rules — use admin/sharing-and-visibility. NOT for FLS — use admin/permission-sets-vs-profiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when setting up, configuring, or managing Salesforce Lightning Knowledge — enabling the feature, designing record types on Knowledge__kav, configuring Data Categories for organization and visibility control, setting up publishing workflows, and layering approval processes. Trigger keywords: Lightning Knowledge setup, Knowledge article record types, Data Category visibility, Knowledge publishing workflow, Knowledge__kav configuration. NOT for converting Classic Article Types to Lightning — use admin/knowledge-classic-to-lightning. NOT for bulk-loading articles from an external help center — use data/knowledge-article-import. NOT for sizing the taxonomy itself (how many groups, how deep) — use architect/knowledge-taxonomy-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when configuring, applying, or troubleshooting NPSP Engagement Plans — the framework that automatically generates standard Salesforce Task records on a timed schedule to guide donor stewardship and constituent outreach. Trigger keywords: engagement plan, donor stewardship tasks, NPSP task automation, engagement template, major donor follow-up. NOT for designing the cultivation and stewardship stages — use admin/fundraising-process-mapping. NOT for recording and receipting gifts — use admin/gift-entry-and-processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requirements mapping for the full donor lifecycle in NPSP or Nonprofit Cloud: acquisition stage design, moves management, upgrade paths, lapsed donor re-engagement, and portfolio segmentation. NOT for mapping the Opportunity sales processes and stage picklists — use admin/fundraising-process-mapping. NOT for stewardship task automation — use admin/npsp-engagement-plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing Custom Notification Types that fire via Flow, Apex, or Process Builder to Lightning bell, desktop, mobile (push), and Slack. Covers channel enablement, targeting, deliverability, consent, and anti-spam discipline. NOT for actually sending one from Flow or Apex, or the recipient limit — use admin/custom-notification-types. NOT for email templates and alerts — use admin/email-templates-and-alerts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a product idea into a repeatable manual process you can start delivering today. Use to design manual-first products before writing any code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for creating software diagrams using Mermaid syntax. Use when users need to create, visualize, or document software through diagrams including class diagrams (domain modeling, object-oriented design), sequence diagrams (application flows, API interactions, code execution), flowcharts (processes, algorithms, user journeys), entity relationship diagrams (database schemas), C4 architecture diagrams (system context, containers, components), state diagrams, git graphs, pie charts, gantt charts, or any other diagram type. Triggers include requests to "diagram", "visualize", "model", "map out", "show the flow", or when explaining system architecture, database design, code structure, or user/application flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Task-sized forensic analysis of Vivado synthesis and routed timing evidence for processor RTL. Use when Codex must trace a named setup or hold path, audit whole-design timing populations, compare implementation runs, map primitive, LUT, CARRY, BRAM, DSP, MUXF, register, and routed-net stages back to Chisel or generated RTL, distinguish logic from routing pressure, identify missing DCP queries, or write an evidence-backed timing report. This skill is read-only by default and stops at ranked modification directions. Use optimize-chisel-fpga-timing for RTL edits and routed A/B implementation closure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert data engineer for ETL/ELT pipelines, streaming, data warehousing. Activate on: data pipeline, ETL, ELT, data warehouse, Spark, Kafka, Airflow, dbt, data modeling, star schema, streaming data, batch processing, data quality. NOT for: API design (use api-architect), ML training (use ML skills), dashboards (use design skills).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master of text-based visual communication using ASCII art, Unicode box-drawing, and structured diagram notation. Creates clear, maintainable diagrams for systems, processes, hierarchies, relationships, and psychological structures. Proactively generates diagrams to enhance understanding. Activate on visualization needs, system architecture, process flows, psychological mapping, or when complex concepts would benefit from visual representation. NOT for photo editing, vector graphics, or GUI-based design tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in color theory, palette harmony, and perceptual color science for computational photo composition. Specializes in earth-mover distance optimization, warm/cool alternation, diversity-aware palette selection, and hue-based photo sequencing. Activate on "color palette", "color harmony", "warm cool", "earth mover distance", "Wasserstein", "LAB space", "hue sorted", "palette matching". NOT for basic RGB manipulation (use standard image processing), single-photo color grading (use native-app-designer), UI color schemes (use vaporwave-glassomorphic-ui-designer), or color blindness simulation (accessibility specialists).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a background-job system, choosing between BullMQ / Sidekiq / RQ / Temporal / SQS, deciding queue-vs-workflow, sizing concurrency vs rate limits, building dead-letter queues, or making handlers idempotent. Triggers: jobs running twice on retry, lost jobs after worker crash, DLQ filling up, Redis OOM from job backlog, exactly-once requested, "do we need Temporal?", visibility timeout / lockDuration confusion, exponential backoff vs jitter, fan-out fan-in workflows. NOT for outbound webhook publishing (different concerns), receiver-side webhook handling (different concerns), event-streaming/Kafka topology, or in-process async (event loop only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guia completo para criar diagramas de software usando sintaxe Mermaid. Use quando usuários precisarem criar, visualizar ou documentar software por meio de diagramas, incluindo diagramas de classe (modelagem de domínio, design orientado a objetos), diagramas de sequência (fluxos de aplicação, interações de API, execução de código), fluxogramas (processos, algoritmos, jornadas do usuário), diagramas de relacionamento de entidades (esquemas de banco de dados), diagramas de arquitetura C4 (contexto do sistema, containers, componentes), diagramas de estado, git graphs, gráficos de pizza, gráficos de Gantt ou qualquer outro tipo de diagrama. Acionadores incluem solicitações para "diagram", "visualize", "model", "map out", "show the flow" ou ao explicar arquitetura de sistema, design de banco de dados, estrutura de código ou fluxos de usuário/aplicação.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lark/Feishu real-time event listening / subscribing / consuming: stream events as NDJSON via `lark-cli event consume <EventKey>` (covers IM message receive, reactions, chat member changes, etc.). Use for Lark bots, real-time message processing, long-running subscribers, streaming webhook/push handlers. Supports `--max-events` / `--timeout` bounded runs and a stderr ready-marker contract — designed for AI agents running as subprocesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, review, and diagnose tests and fixtures that can fail nondeterministically under CI concurrency, shared host resources, clocks, process-global state, subprocesses, network listeners, or asynchronous teardown. Use when adding or changing tests with those risks, investigating flaky CI, or reviewing test isolation; use pre-push-checks separately to select outgoing commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Salesforce system development and operations management. Use this skill when working with Salesforce configuration, customization, bug analysis, troubleshooting access/permission issues, designing system architecture, or implementing custom Apex/LWC development. Covers sharing settings, approval processes, trigger patterns, integration design, and data modeling best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the SD-22 DMSMS Guidebook (DSPO, FY24 working draft). Use for managing Diminished Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) and obsolescence across a long-lived system's life cycle: the five-step process (Prepare, Identify, Assess, Analyze, Implement) plus the Strategize overlay; standing up a DMSMS Management Team (DMT) and Management Plan (DMP); risk-based monitoring and surveillance (the risk cube, predictive tools, vendor surveys, GIDEP/DLA PDNs, critical-materials analysis); health assessments and resolution timing; costing and selecting resolutions (life-of-need buys, substitutes, redesign, technology refreshment) by AoA/BCA; and budgeting/executing resolutions through modification funding and the ECP process. Defense-sustainment / DoD-acquisition framing throughout. Does NOT teach general systems engineering, parts-management standards, or contracting law in depth, and does not reproduce DoD policy text or the source's tables and figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook (NASA/SP-2016-6105 Rev 2). Use for NASA's systems-engineering process model — the SE Engine and 17 common technical processes, the program/project life cycle (Pre-Phase A through F), Key Decision Points and technical reviews (MCR/SRR/PDR/CDR/…), stakeholder expectations, technical requirements, design solution, product verification and validation, and crosscutting technical management (planning, risk, configuration, interfaces, data, assessment, decision analysis). Strong for aerospace/spaceflight project SE and lifecycle gating; NASA-specific terminology (KDPs, NPR 7123.1).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assigns honest lipid annotation levels, designs class-based internal-standard quantification, and runs lipid-aware differential and enrichment analysis with lipidr, guarding against in-source-fragment phantoms, sn-position over-claims, and invalid cross-class quantification. Use when naming or canonicalizing lipid species (shorthand separators, Goslin), deciding shotgun vs RP vs HILIC LC-MS, picking internal standards (SPLASH/EquiSPLASH), interpreting MS-DIAL/LipidSearch output, or comparing lipid classes. For general feature detection see metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing and metabolomics/msdial-preprocessing; for non-lipid annotation confidence see metabolomics/metabolite-annotation; for normalization/QC see metabolomics/normalization-qc; for multivariate stats see metabolomics/statistical-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and create AEM Workflow models on AEM as a Cloud Service. Use when creating workflow models via the Workflow Model Editor or content package XML, defining step types (PROCESS, PARTICIPANT, DYNAMIC_PARTICIPANT, OR_SPLIT, AND_SPLIT), configuring step properties, declaring workflow variables, and deploying models through the Cloud Manager pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate process decomposition and architecture design quality before execution begins. Load when the setup-evaluator agent fires (automatic for agent-chain tasks), or when user says "evaluate this setup", "check the decomposition", "validate the architecture", "is this plan sound", "review the agent design". Catches structural errors, missing knowledge, unrealistic step ordering, and topology mismatches. Does NOT modify — only evaluates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。