「quality」の検索結果

SonarQube code quality and security analysis. Use when working with code quality metrics, security hotspots, quality gates, or issue tracking in SonarQube Cloud or Server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data Quality Specialist IA — Expert en qualité des données (profiling, cleaning, déduplication, validation de schéma, Great Expectations)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GPU-accelerated data curation for LLM training. Supports text/image/video/audio. Features fuzzy deduplication (16× faster), quality filtering (30+ heuristics), semantic deduplication, PII redaction, NSFW detection. Scales across GPUs with RAPIDS. Use for preparing high-quality training datasets, cleaning web data, or deduplicating large corpora.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive toolkit for preparing ISO 13485 certification documentation for medical device Quality Management Systems. Use when users need help with ISO 13485 QMS documentation, including (1) conducting gap analysis of existing documentation, (2) creating Quality Manuals, (3) developing required procedures and work instructions, (4) preparing Medical Device Files, (5) understanding ISO 13485 requirements, or (6) identifying missing documentation for medical device certification. Also use when users mention medical device regulations, QMS certification, FDA QMSR, EU MDR, or need help with quality system documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. This should trigger for requests such as Create ADR for Non-functional requirements; Document Non-functional requirements; Capture Non-functional requirements; Generate Non-functional requirements in an ADR. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gates determinísticos para Vue.js, JavaScript e TypeScript. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate Vue.js", ESLint, vue-tsc ou Vitest em projeto Vue.js, cobertura, complexidade, bundle, acessibilidade ou baseline para Vue.js.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estratégia de quality gates determinísticos e adoção incremental para CI/CD. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate", "gate de qualidade", "política de bloqueio", "baseline", "ratchet", "qualidade no CI" ou "SonarQube".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gates determinísticos para aplicações e serviços Node.js, JavaScript e TypeScript. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate Node.js", ESLint ou tsc em Node.js, testes, cobertura, complexidade, SAST, SCA, build ou baseline para Node.js.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically review pull requests, feature implementations, and code changes to ensure quality, maintainability, security, and adherence to best practices. Use when reviewing code before merging, conducting peer reviews, performing self-reviews, auditing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, ensuring consistent coding standards, verifying test coverage, assessing performance implications, evaluating architectural decisions, or providing constructive feedback to improve team code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code quality dashboard. Wraps existing project tools (type checker, linter, test runner, dead code detector, shell linter), computes a weighted composite 0-10 score, and tracks trends over time. Use when: "health check", "code quality", "how healthy is the codebase", "run all checks", "quality score". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design structured evaluation rubrics for scoring LLM and agent outputs — defining quality dimensions, scoring scales, hard gates, score descriptions, and edge cases. Load when the user asks to create an eval rubric, define evaluation criteria, design scoring dimensions, write an eval spec, or says "what should I evaluate", "design a rubric", "create eval criteria", "define quality dimensions", "evaluation rubric for", "how do I measure quality of". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare high-quality datasets for LLM fine-tuning with filtering, deduplication, augmentation, and RLHF data formatting. Activate on: fine-tuning data, training data curation, RLHF dataset, data quality filtering, SFT dataset. NOT for: model training infrastructure (ai-engineer), prompt engineering without fine-tuning (prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates agent outputs against expected schemas and quality criteria. Reports structural and content checks within the declared evidence scope. Activate on 'validate output', 'output validation', 'schema validation', 'check output', 'output quality'. NOT for confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a PR review request to the correct tool — code-review plugin (quick parallel scan across all dimensions) or pr-review-toolkit (deep-dive on a specific quality dimension such as type design, error handling, test quality, comments, or simplification). Use when the user asks for a code review, PR review, or mentions a specific quality concern before creating a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality assurance review for implementations. Use when reviewing code quality, checking implementation standards, performing QA cycles, or validating feature quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GPU-accelerated data curation for LLM training. Supports text/image/video/audio. Features fuzzy deduplication (16× faster), quality filtering (30+ heuristics), semantic deduplication, PII redaction, NSFW detection. Scales across GPUs with RAPIDS. Use for preparing high-quality training datasets, cleaning web data, or deduplicating large corpora.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

論文や研究計画を共通の評価基準で読み、研究方法、根拠、引用、文章構成を点検するスキル。評価の理由と修正の優先順位、次に直す内容を整理します。

• 投稿前の論文を見直したいとき
• 引用が主張を支えるか確認したいとき
• 研究方法と限界を評価したいとき

機械学習モデルを本番で使うために、データの仕様、再現可能な学習、品質評価、配備、監視、切り戻しを整理し、実装計画やレビュー項目にまとめるスキル。

• 実験コードを学習パイプラインにしたいとき
• モデル公開前の品質基準づくり
• データ漏洩や前処理の不一致の調査

変数や関数の命名、読みやすさ、元のデータを直接変更しない更新方法、エラー処理などの共通基準でコードを見直し、保守しやすい形に整えるスキル。

• 既存コードの命名と読みやすさのレビュー
• 長い関数や深い条件分岐を整理したいとき
• 新しいモジュールの規約をそろえたいとき