「quality」の検索結果

Build QA quality dashboards, calculate defect metrics, analyze escape rates, and produce quality trend reports. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to measure and communicate quality outcomes. Trigger on phrases like "quality metrics", "defect density", "escape rate", "bug trends", "quality dashboard", "sprint quality report", "test coverage metrics", "QA KPIs", "how is quality trending", "defect leakage", "production bugs this quarter", "mean time to detect", "quality scorecard", or any request to quantify, visualize, or report on the quality of a product or testing process. Also trigger when a manager asks "how is QA performing?" or an engineering lead asks "what does our defect data tell us?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

製造現場の規格不適合について、対象品の隔離から原因分析、処置の検討、是正・予防措置の効果確認までを整理し、管理図の読み取りや仕入先品質の改善も支援します。

• 検査で見つかった不適合を調査したいとき
• 根本原因の分析手法を選びたいとき
• 是正措置の計画作成と効果確認

Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2. Use when leading management reviews, setting quality policy and objectives, monitoring quality KPIs and cost of quality, or exercising QMR governance and regulatory oversight responsibilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate ENCODE experiment quality using standard metrics and audit flags. Use when the user asks about data quality, wants to filter for high-quality experiments, needs to interpret quality metrics (FRiP, NSC, RSC, NRF, IDR, TSS enrichment, fragment size), wants to understand ENCODE audit warnings, needs to compare quality across experiments, or is deciding whether data is usable for their analysis. Also use when the user mentions QC, quality control, or data filtering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with FASTQ quality scores using Biopython - access Phred scores, filter and trim by quality, compute per-position profiles, and convert between Sanger/Phred+33, Solexa, and Illumina/Phred+64 encodings. Use when analyzing read quality, filtering or trimming low-quality bases, generating quality reports, or deciding which FASTQ quality encoding a file uses before parsing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for vibe coding that produce production-quality output instead of garbage. Covers prompt engineering for AI coding, verification without reading every line, accept/reject/refine decision framework, architectural guardrails, context management (CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules), TDD-driven vibe coding, screenshot-driven development, diff review discipline, and the anti-patterns that destroy quality. Activate on: "vibe coding", "AI coding quality", "Claude Code workflow", "AI-assisted development", "how to use AI for coding", "coding with AI", "agentic engineering workflow", "AI code quality", "vibe code without garbage", "production quality AI code", "CLAUDE.md setup", "cursorrules setup", "pre-commit hooks for AI", "TDD with AI", "test-driven vibe coding". NOT for: multi-person collaborative coding sessions (use cooperative-vibe-coding), building AI/LLM applications (use ai-engineer), prompt engineering for non-coding LLM use cases (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with FASTQ quality scores using Biopython. Use when analyzing read quality, filtering by quality, trimming low-quality bases, or generating quality reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with FASTQ quality scores using Biopython. Use when analyzing read quality, filtering by quality, trimming low-quality bases, or generating quality reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level air quality engineering covering pollutant sources, atmospheric dispersion, air quality standards, emission controls, and air quality modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full adversarial quality loop — implement, self-attack, parallel verification, quality gates, final validation. 全品質循環：實現、自攻、並行驗證、質量關卡、最終確認. Use when: implement task with quality, run adversarial review, verify code quality, run quality gates, complete workflow task

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AIエージェントが継続して作業するループを、品質確認と評価、失敗時の停止・再実行の方針を組み合わせて設計し、進捗停滞や再試行に対処するスキル。

• 継続作業のループ方式を選びたいとき
• 品質確認と評価を組み合わせたいとき
• 失敗や進捗停滞からの復旧

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze skill quality", "evaluate this skill", "review skill quality", "check my skill", or "generate quality report". Evaluates local skills across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze skill quality", "evaluate this skill", "review skill quality", "check my skill", or "generate quality report". Evaluates local skills across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Evidence Quality Appraiser - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive quality assessment Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids automatic tool application, delivers research-specific evaluation strategies Use when: appraising study quality, assessing risk of bias, grading evidence Triggers: quality appraisal, RoB, GRADE, Newcastle-Ottawa, risk of bias, methodological quality

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Filter reads by quality scores, length, and N content using Trimmomatic and fastp. Apply sliding window trimming, remove low-quality bases from read ends, and discard reads below thresholds. Use when reads have poor quality tails or require minimum quality for downstream analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds quality into operations — defining standards, catching defects at the right point, root cause analysis, and continuous improvement. Use this to reduce a defect or error rate, design quality controls into a process, run a root cause analysis, respond to a customer quality complaint, or set up quality metrics that drive behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "I need a health score before the release", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a generated Scenario image needs a quality check or a brand-brief compliance verdict before it ships: pass/warn/fail scoring, on-brand review against a configured brief, QA gating a batch, pricing or refreshing a stored verdict, or iterating a generation until it clears the gate. Keywords: quality gate, quality check, QA, verdict, brief compliance, on-brand, brand brief, pass fail, score, review, asset_quality_gate_run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech. Use for management reviews, quality objectives and KPIs, quality culture, and Notified Body / FDA inspection prep per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply requirement quality principles when generating or validating feature specifications. Enforces feature completeness, scenario structure, AC verifiability, feature independence, and implementation slice quality. Use when writing feature specs, validating existing requirements, or when the user mentions 'validate this spec', 'check this feature', 'requirement quality', 'is this spec complete', or 'requirement-quality'. This skill governs the craft of writing individual feature specifications — not technical design (see design-blueprint), not implementation (see code-forge).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent and LLM evaluations in CI/CD pipelines — automated quality gates that fail the build when AI output quality drops. Use when someone asks to "test my AI agent", "add evals to CI", "catch prompt regressions", "compare models", "evaluate LLM output quality", "set up AI quality gates", or "benchmark my agent before deploying". Covers eval frameworks (Cobalt, Promptfoo, Braintrust), LLM-as-judge scoring, threshold-based assertions, and GitHub Actions integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate data quality in CSV/Excel files for vehicle insurance platform. Use when checking required fields, validating data formats, detecting quality issues, or generating quality reports. Mentions "validate", "check fields", "data quality", "missing values", or "quality score".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。