「regress」の検索結果

Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers. Use when comparing agent or prompt changes, reproducing failures, or running agent regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adopt repository-level harness engineering for coding agents. Use when a user wants to prevent repeated AI coding-agent mistakes by turning failures into durable instructions, drift checks, regression tests, failure memory, and adoption reports tailored to the target repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Downloads, exports, and inspects existing Arize traces and spans to understand what an LLM app is doing or debug runtime issues. Covers exporting traces by ID, spans by ID, sessions by ID, and root-cause investigation using the ax CLI. Use when the user wants to look at existing trace data, see what their LLM app is doing, export traces, download spans, investigate errors, or analyze behavior regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean AI-generated code slop with a regression-safe, deletion-first workflow and optional reviewer-only mode

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Replay-first debug flow for SGLang serving problems. Use when a live or recent server shows health-check failures, latency or throughput regressions, queue growth, timeouts, distributed stalls, crash dumps, wrong outputs after deploys, or PD/EP/HiCache issues, and the job is to turn the problem into a replay plus the right next debug tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate a legacy-template SGLang cookbook page (monolithic per-model generator under docs/src/snippets/autoregressive/) onto the config-driven template (shared _deployment.jsx / _playground.jsx engines + per-model config). Use when asked to migrate, convert, or port an existing cookbook page — NOT for brand-new models (use cookbook-add-model for those). Run with /cookbook-migrate-model <Model page name, e.g. GLM-5.1>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate consistently failing SGLang CI tests by extracting the failure signature from scheduled or rerun workflows, bisecting the passing/failing commit window, checking runner or hardware specificity, and optionally reproducing on a remote GPU host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative statistical methods: ADF unit-root / cointegration tests, GARCH volatility modeling, regression diagnostics (heteroskedasticity / autocorrelation), Bootstrap, and hypothesis testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The meta skill. Turn any raw feature into a properly-skilled, tested, resolvable unit of agent capability. Idempotent: running on an existing skill improves it (bug fix, new input, quality pass) instead of starting from scratch. Every skill declares an EVAL CONTRACT (its goal + skill-specific dimensions + hard-fails) so the cross-modal eval judges THIS skill's real purpose, not generic slop. Cross-modal eval runs BEFORE tests: 3 frontier models from different providers critique the output against the contract, you iterate to quality, THEN write/update tests that lock in the proven-good behavior. NO-REGRESSION LAW: any edit to a skill must score >= the previous iteration's eval — forward only, never back. For skills that back a scheduled job, an edit MUST re-run a representative task and eval it before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure Python SDK coverage or address measured coverage gaps. Use for coverage audits and metric regressions, not routine test additions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find when and why tests broke on main: bisect a Swift package suite on CI across old commits, read the failure matrix, and decide per test whether the test went stale or the code regressed. Use when a suite is red on main, when PR CI only ran filtered tests and the full suite has drifted, or when asked which PR broke a test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class senior data scientist skill specialising in statistical modeling, experiment design, causal inference, and predictive analytics. Covers A/B testing (sample sizing, two-proportion z-tests, Bonferroni correction), difference-in-differences, feature engineering pipelines (Scikit-learn, XGBoost), cross-validated model evaluation (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, SHAP), and MLflow experiment tracking — using Python (NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-learn), R, and SQL. Use when designing or analysing controlled experiments, building and evaluating classification or regression models, performing causal analysis on observational data, engineering features for structured tabular datasets, or translating statistical findings into data-driven business decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a named diff or PR for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use when asked to review code or when a shipping skill needs a review receipt. Use when asked to apply this review's findings locally. Use ce-resolve-pr-feedback for feedback already left on a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hands-off, diff-scoped browser QA of the active branch: maps user flows, drives a real browser, autonomously fixes small breakages with regression tests and commits, judges experience against product personas, and writes a durable dogfood report. Manual invocation only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR against the Pascal architectural rules — package boundaries (core/viewer/editor/nodes), the registry-driven composition model (def.geometry / def.renderer / def.system), legacy-dispatch regressions, the slots + world-scale-UV convention for new nodes/geometry, hook hygiene (useEditor/useScene/useViewer), and selector performance. Use when the user asks to review a PR, audit a branch, or check that changes respect the codebase's architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A user saw internal_error, "Unexpected server error", a 500, or an opaque failure in a shipped OpenWork build. Find the cause from local logs and Sentry, name the regressing PR, file the issue, and reply where it was reported.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing Playwright visual regression tests or adding a demo route for one - covers the decision rule (what earns a capture, and that a visual spec is in addition to a Playwright assertion), the custom tablePage fixture, the screenshot workflow, reg-suit comparison, and the demo routes in examples/next/visual-tests/

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or changing a demo the visual regression suite photographs - the Vite-based demo apps in examples/next/visual-tests/<framework>/demo/, the js Navigo router with one /<feature>-demo route per feature, the shared / grid that must stay identical across frameworks, and the sample-data patterns

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing changed or staged code, a branch, or a PR in the Handsontable monorepo across architecture, code quality, performance, accessibility, and tests. Covers SOLID / Law of Demeter / plugin decoupling / breaking-changes policy, custom ESLint rules / JSDoc / naming / cognitive complexity, large-array and render-batching performance, WCAG 2.1 AA + keyboard navigation, and the tests a change ships (a named exercising test per new path, scoped mutation, a ticket on every weakened assertion). Trigger when asked to review changes, check a diff against Handsontable conventions, assess architectural correctness, spot performance regressions, verify accessibility, or judge whether a change's tests prove it, and as the design lens before or while implementing any core change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working on React code in `apps/lite` that derives values during render, adds or consumes a context, subscribes to the redux store or a query, or renders lists of row components — and whenever the lite UI is reported slow, laggy, or re-rendering too much. React Compiler does not prevent these regressions; load this skill BEFORE writing such code, not only when debugging it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose GKE Cloud TPU training throughput drops and step-time regressions (15%+ TPU duty-cycle drop) using ML Diagnostics Workload Monitoring (`gcloud alpha mldiagnostics monitored-events` / `hypercomputecluster.googleapis.com/v1alpha`) and 1-minute Cloud Monitoring system metrics (`kubernetes.io/node/accelerator/*`). Distinguishes hardware and network fabric throttling from workload resource bottlenecks (HBM capacity, host memory, or host CPU saturation). Use when TPU training throughput or duty cycle drops without crashing pods, when `PERFORMANCE_DEGRADATION` monitored events fire, or when triaging slow multi-slice training steps. Don't use for complete multi-slice XLA execution stalls with `HANG_DETECTED` logs (use gke-ai-troubleshooting-tpu-mxla-hang) or pod eviction/interruption restarts (use gke-ai-troubleshooting-jobset-interruption).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query Cloud Trace spans, filter by latency thresholds or error status, correlate distributed traces with Cloud Logging, and diagnose latency bottlenecks across Google Cloud services. Use when investigating slow requests, analyzing trace hierarchies, or resolving latency regressions. Do NOT use for querying non-GCP telemetry or database query optimization outside Cloud Trace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。