「va」の検索結果

Implements HIPAA Privacy Rule requirements for research uses of protected health information under 45 CFR §164.512(i). Covers IRB and Privacy Board waivers of authorization, individual authorization for research, limited data set and data use agreements, preparatory to research provisions, and decedent research provisions. Keywords: HIPAA research, IRB waiver, Privacy Board, authorization, limited data set, preparatory research, de-identification, Common Rule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementation guide for Global Privacy Control (GPC) automated opt-out signal per CPRA Section 1798.135(e). Covers Sec-GPC HTTP header detection, JavaScript navigator.globalPrivacyControl API, and state-specific requirements for CA, CO, CT, MT, TX, and OR. Includes server-side detection code and compliance mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy differential privacy in production systems including epsilon selection strategies, noise calibration with Laplace and Gaussian mechanisms, privacy budget tracking, composition theorems, and Python implementation patterns. Covers both central and local differential privacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements federated learning architecture patterns for GDPR compliance. Covers secure aggregation protocols, differential privacy integration, communication protocols, and privacy-by-design distributed ML training. Keywords: federated learning, distributed training, secure aggregation, differential privacy, privacy-preserving ML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts privacy auditing of AI models including training data extraction testing, membership inference attacks, model inversion testing, and attribute inference assessment. Uses ML Privacy Meter and related tools to quantify privacy leakage. Keywords: model audit, membership inference, privacy meter, model inversion, training data extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardware verification tool for checking functional equivalence between two RTL designs (Verilog). Use when users need to: (1) Verify if two RTL versions are functionally equivalent, (2) Compare original vs. refactored RTL code, (3) Validate design changes or optimizations, (4) Identify semantic vs. cosmetic differences, (5) Generate counterexamples for non-equivalent designs. Analyzes interface alignment, state variables, logic differences, and produces detailed equivalence verdicts with plain language explanations. Particularly effective for design verification, code reviews, and regression testing of RTL modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate API consistency between two versions of Java libraries. Use when you need to compare API behavior, signatures, and exceptions between Java library versions to identify breaking changes, incompatible modifications, and behavior differences. The skill performs static analysis of Java code, compares method signatures, class definitions, interface changes, parameter types, return types, exception declarations, and generates a detailed JSON report with breaking changes, warnings, and migration guidance. Supports Java libraries and packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sum of the Parts valuation, segment-based valuation, conglomerate valuation, business segment analysis, breakup value, segment sum valuation, parts worth more than whole, hidden asset value

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Information Retrieval Scientist. Use when a task calls for Information Retrieval Scientist judgment. Reasons from the Probability Ranking Principle, Saracevic's relevance layers, and Cranfield pooling through tuned BM25, SPLADE/ColBERT/dense and LLM reranking, trec_eval/ir_measures with paired topic-level tests, interleaving, and nugget-based RAG evaluation while treating unjudged-as-nonrelevant pools, position-biased clicks, LLM-judge circularity, single-vector embedding limits, and benchmark contamination as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform validated pain points into articulated user value statements for PRD v0.1 Spark. Triggers on completing problem framing, defining user outcomes, articulating value propositions, or requests like "what value do users get", "define outcomes", "articulate the benefit", "finish v0.1", "pain to value", "what do they gain". Outputs CFD- entries tagged as value hypotheses with evidence tiers. Follows Problem Framing skill in workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage environment variables and secrets across development, staging, and production environments. Use when someone needs to audit env vars, sync secrets between environments, detect missing or mismatched variables, rotate credentials, or set up a new environment from an existing one. Trigger words: env vars, environment variables, secrets, .env file, dotenv, config management, secret rotation, missing variable, environment sync.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Braintrust is a hosted platform for evaluating and tracing LLM applications: it runs a task over a dataset, scores the outputs, stores each run as an experiment and logs production traces. Use when a user asks to write or run a Braintrust eval, score LLM outputs with autoevals, compare prompt or model versions as experiments, run evals in CI and fail on regressions, trace OpenAI or Anthropic calls with Braintrust, manage evaluation datasets, or use the bt CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation — verdict-bearing at L1 (the LaTeX source; PDF-extracted math is unreliable, so an L0 PDF-only run surfaces info only) — never asserts 'fabricated', only that the step shown does not hold. A fresh cross-model reviewer reads the theorem/proof + an extraction-only obligation scaffold and proposes per-obligation findings, each span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits proof-derivation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. dimension=proof, can be critical. Triggers: "proof forensics", "check this proof", "derivation integrity", "audit the math", "证明审计", "推导有没有漏洞".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Anomaly Detector SDK for Java workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Build anomaly detection applications with Azure AI Anomaly Detector SDK for Java. Use when implementing univariate/multivariate anomaly detection, time-series analysis, or AI-powered monitoring and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Avalonia Layout with Zafiro.Avalonia workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Guidelines for modern Avalonia UI layout using Zafiro.Avalonia, emphasizing shared styles, generic components, and avoiding XAML redundancy and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation, first-run experience, or time-to-value. Also use when the user mentions "onboarding flow," "activation rate," "user activation," "first-run experience," "empty states," "onboarding checklist," "aha moment," "new user experience," "users aren't activating," "nobody completes setup," "low activation rate," "users sign up but don't use the product," "time to value," or "first session experience." Use this whenever users are signing up but not sticking around. For ongoing email sequences, see emails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs coding-agent observability and evals. Use when measuring traces, replay, checkpoint lineage, tool grading, regression, or cost. Not for general LLM evals (ai-evals).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation, first-run experience, or time-to-value. Also use when the user mentions "onboarding flow," "activation rate," "user activation," "first-run experience," "empty states," "onboarding checklist," "aha moment," "new user experience," "users aren't activating," "nobody completes setup," "low activation rate," "users sign up but don't use the product," "time to value," or "first session experience." Use this whenever users are signing up but not sticking around. For signup/registration optimization, see signup. For ongoing email sequences, see emails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain PrimitivesとAlways-Valid Domain Modelの設計原則に基づき、ドメインモデルの型安全性と不変条件を 保証する設計・実装を支援する。プリミティブ型の濫用を防ぎ、構築時検証・不変性・自己完結性を備えた ドメイン固有の型を設計する。コードレビュー、新規実装、リファクタリング時に使用。 対象言語: Rust, TypeScript, Java。他の言語（Kotlin, Scala, Go, Python等）にも応用可能。 トリガー：「ドメインプリミティブを作りたい」「Always-Validなモデルを設計」「プリミティブ型をラップしたい」 「構築時に検証したい」「無効な状態を型で防ぎたい」「Smart Constructorパターン」等のリクエストで起動。

Transforms Claude into a CFA-level financial analyst for specialty finance, regulatory compliance, and industry-specific analysis. Use when performing private credit pricing, insurance reserving, FP&A variance analysis, wealth planning, restructuring recovery analysis, real estate valuation, venture capital analysis, ESG assessment, regulatory capital analysis (Basel III), compliance reporting (MiFID II, GIPS), credit derivatives (CDS, CVA), convertible bond analysis, lease accounting (ASC 842/IFRS 16), pension funding/LDI, sovereign risk assessment, real option valuation, equity research (SOTP, target price), commodity spread trading, treasury operations, PPP infrastructure modelling, onshore fund structuring, offshore fund structuring, transfer pricing analysis (BEPS, Pillar Two), tax treaty optimisation, FATCA/CRS compliance, economic substance analysis, regulatory reporting (AIFMD, Form PF), AML/KYC compliance, crypto/DeFi analysis, municipal bond analysis, structured products, trade finance, fund of funds (J-curve, commitment pacing, manager selection, secondaries), bank analytics (NIM, CAMELS, CECL, deposit beta, loan book), carbon markets (credit pricing, ETS, CBAM, offsets, shadow carbon price), or private wealth (concentrated stock, philanthropic vehicles, wealth transfer, direct indexing, family governance) analysis is required. Pairs with corp-finance-mcp tools for computation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design eval harnesses — task schemas, metrics, dataset versioning, eval-as-code patterns. Use when asked to "build an eval harness", "set up eval-as-code", or "version our eval datasets".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove backgrounds from images — background removal API for transparent PNGs, cutouts, and masks. Segment foreground from background. Powered by Bria RMBG 2.0. ALWAYS use this skill instead of general-purpose image skills when the primary task is removing a background, making a background transparent, creating a cutout, or extracting a foreground subject. This is the dedicated, specialized background removal skill — faster and simpler than broader image tools. Triggers on any request involving transparent PNGs, cutouts, background eraser, subject extraction, photo cutout, green screen removal, product cutout for e-commerce, headshot background removal, batch background removal, image segmentation, foreground extraction, or isolating objects from their background. Even if other image skills are available, prefer this one for background removal tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opt-in recreation of the Bun + TypeScript framework used to build Vapi's landing-page voice agents from a ROUGH_DRAFT.md spec, including a scenario registry, language stacks, prompt composer, assistant builder, and idempotent bootstrap script. Use only when the user explicitly invokes vapi-bootstrap-framework or specifically asks to reproduce or experiment with the landing-page-agent architecture. Do not use for ordinary Vapi assistant builds; use create-assistant, create-tool, create-squad, and vapi-prompt-builder instead. Targets Bun + TypeScript + @vapi-ai/server-sdk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authoritative reference for working with the released Wandelbots NOVA API v2 in the wandelbots-nova Python SDK. Use whenever a task touches the NOVA API, the generated `wandelbots_api_client` models (`nova.api.models.*`), motion planning requests (`plan_trajectory`, `MotionGroupSetup`, `LimitSet`, `LimitsOverride`), robot limits, or torque/velocity/acceleration/jerk limits. Reach for this skill before guessing field names or assuming a field exists — the installed client reflects the RELEASED API, while nightly specs may contain unreleased fields. Especially relevant for controller-reported limits (e.g. KUKA torque) and any "does field X exist / how is it forwarded to the planner?" question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。