4,842 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyze recent code changes via git history and extract software engineering lessons. Use when the user asks 'what is the lesson here?', 'what can I learn from this?', 'engineering takeaway', 'what did I just learn?', 'reflect on this code', or wants to extract principles from recent work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs the pay cycle so it is right, on time, and provable — the calendar and cutoffs, what feeds pay from the HRIS and time systems, gross-to-net and the deductions in it, multi-jurisdiction registration and tax filing, off-cycle payments and corrections, and the reconciliation to the general ledger. Use this to design or audit a payroll process, work out what happens when someone is paid wrong, or understand what changes when you hire in a new state or country.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Owns what gets built and why: product strategy, roadmap, discovery, user experience, and the definition of success for each release. Use this to decide what to build next, to cut scope, to turn a business goal into a product bet, to judge whether a feature is worth its cost, or when engineering and go-to-market disagree about what a release is for. Also use for roadmap sequencing and for killing work that is not earning its place.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The EPMO lead's remit — what the PMO governs, what it must never become, and how it earns standing rather than compliance. Use this to stand up or reform a PMO, decide what it should and should not control, judge whether it is adding value or overhead, or work out why teams route around it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds the capability to notice an attack in progress — deciding what to log and retain, centralizing it somewhere tamper-resistant, writing detections that fire on attacker behavior rather than on individual events, tuning out the noise that trains people to ignore alerts, and defining what happens when something fires. Use this to design or assess monitoring coverage, work out why an incident went unnoticed, cut alert volume without losing signal, or decide what a detection capability should cost.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds out whether a problem is real and a solution would work, before building it — recruiting the right people, interviewing without leading them, separating what users say from what they do, naming the riskiest assumption and testing that one first, and reaching a decision rather than a summary. Use this to validate a problem, test an idea cheaply, decide whether to build something, or fix a discovery process that keeps confirming what the team already believed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Protects data itself rather than the systems around it — classifying what you hold, encrypting in transit and at rest and understanding what each actually defends against, managing keys and their rotation, handling secrets in applications and pipelines, minimizing and de-identifying, and deleting on purpose. Use this to design data protection for a system, assess an encryption claim, set up key or secret management, or work out what a stolen backup would actually expose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defines and manages service levels — setting targets that reflect what customers need, measuring honestly, and handling breaches. Use this to write or negotiate an SLA, decide what to measure and at what threshold, respond to a missed service level, or work out why a service that meets its targets still has unhappy customers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establishes what a product is understood to be, for whom, and instead of what — then turns that into the messaging every other surface inherits. Use this when messaging is inconsistent across channels, when prospects misunderstand what the product does, when entering a new segment, when competitors are being compared against you unfavorably, or before any campaign, launch, or site rewrite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs content as an operation — the production pipeline, editorial calendar, repurposing engine, competitive content intelligence, and audits of what already exists. Use this to build or fix a content production system, plan a calendar, decide how one piece becomes many, rank content ideas by expected impact, or audit an existing library for what to update, consolidate, or retire. For deciding what territory to own and why, use `content-strategy` first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds the loop from what customers say to what gets changed — collecting feedback, distinguishing signal from noise, routing it to owners, and closing the loop back to the customer. Use this to set up a feedback program, design or interpret CSAT/NPS, decide what customer feedback deserves action, get product to act on recurring issues, or diagnose why feedback is collected but nothing changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs a realistic, execution-aware biomedical study version under explicit constraints of samples, time, budget, data access, lab capacity, team skill, and validation resources. Always use this skill when the user has a real study idea, a candidate route, or a partially framed project but cannot assume ideal conditions. If critical feasibility inputs are missing, first clarify what resources are currently available, what resources may be obtainable, and what resources are realistically unavailable. Do not invent access, capabilities, collaborations, or validation resources. Focus first on feasibility-constrained study framing, route narrowing, dependency control, and minimum viable study design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tracks the latest preprints and emerging research topics related to your topic across bioRxiv, medRxiv, and arXiv. Use when a user wants to discover what is being published right now before it reaches journals, monitor competitor directions, spot new methodology trends, or get an early-warning scan of a research area. Triggers on phrases like "what's new in X", "latest preprints on Y", "emerging topics in Z", "monitor bioRxiv for", or "what are people working on in this field".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query the local code graph (functions, classes, calls, imports) through the Deeplake mount at memory/graph/. Use when the user asks structural questions about the codebase — "what calls X?", "what does Y import?", "where is Z defined?", "what is the architecture / which subsystems exist?". The graph is an AST-derived map of the repo, queried as files (no build needed — it rebuilds automatically).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search past meeting transcripts and voice memos for specific topics, people, decisions, or ideas. Use this whenever the user asks "what did we discuss about X", "find that meeting where we talked about Y", "what did Alex say", "did we decide on", "what was that idea about", or any question that could be answered by searching their meeting history. Also use for "do I have any notes about" or "check my meetings for".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surface recent voice memos and ideas captured from any device. Use when the user asks "what ideas did I have?", "what were my recent memos?", "what did I record while walking?", or wants to recall a captured thought.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calm a heated conflict — in person or in writing — before it does damage, by lowering the temperature instead of winning the point. Use when asked help me de-escalate this, this argument is getting heated, calm this situation down, or how do I respond without making it worse. Produces a read on what's actually driving the heat (often an unmet need under the surface argument), the de-escalation moves (acknowledge, slow down, find the shared ground), what to say and what to avoid, and how to steer toward resolution once the temperature drops — because you can't solve anything while everyone's activated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a fast, honest competitive scan — the dimension table built from public evidence (sites, docs, pricing pages, changelogs, reviews), the claims-vs-observed discipline, and the so-what synthesis that ends in moves, not a landscape mural. Use when asked what are competitors doing, quick scan of these three rivals, how does our pricing/feature set compare, or prep the competitive slide honestly. Produces the evidence-based comparison table, the marketing-vs-reality flags, the so-what synthesis, and the staleness date.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a sincere condolence or sympathy message when someone has died or a friend is grieving — warm, personal, and free of the clichés that hurt more than help. Use when asked what to say when someone dies, write a sympathy/condolence message, my friend lost their [person], or I don't know what to say. Produces a heartfelt message tuned to your relationship and the situation, drawn from a specific memory or quality where possible, an honest acknowledgment (not toxic-positive platitudes), an offer of concrete support, and guidance on what to avoid saying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare job levels (职级) across Chinese technology companies and against international ladders, to judge an offer, a job move or a promotion target: what a level usually means in scope and expectations, how levels roughly line up, and what to ask the recruiter. Use when asked P7 相当于什么级别, 跳槽职级怎么对标, 字节 2-2 对应阿里什么, 这个 offer 的职级合理吗, compare Chinese tech levels, or how does Alibaba P-level map to Google levels. Produces a level comparison built from the person's own ladders and offer details, a scope-and-expectation profile for each level, the negotiation questions to ask, and a clear note on what is approximate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain China's social insurance and housing fund (五险一金) for a specific person and city: what each part covers, what they and their employer pay, how the contribution base works, and what happens when they change job, city or leave work. Use when asked 五险一金是什么, 社保怎么交, 公积金怎么提取, 换工作社保断了怎么办, 社保基数, or explain Chinese social insurance. Produces a plain explanation for their situation, a contribution calculation using their city's current rates, and a checklist for job changes, moving city, unemployment or freelancing. Not financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a small, coherent opening repertoire that fits your style and level — the few lines actually worth learning, plus the plans and traps behind them. Use when asked what chess opening should I learn, build me a repertoire, help with my openings, or what to play against [opening]. Produces a compact repertoire for White and Black keyed to your rating and style, the main ideas and typical plans (not just moves to memorize), the common traps to know from both sides, and what to study next — kept small enough to actually learn.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a contract clause in plain English — what it means, who it favours, the realistic risk, and what to negotiate. Use when asked what a clause means, to decode legal language, explain a term in a contract, or assess whether a provision is standard or aggressive. Produces a plain-language translation, a who-does-this-favour read, a risk rating, and concrete redline suggestions. Not legal advice; confirm with counsel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to check whether a figure is audited, which headline numbers sit outside the audited accounts, what 'adjusted' or 'underlying' means in this report, or who is vouching for the numbers in the highlights. For every headline figure in the highlights, chairman's statement and CEO review of an uploaded annual report, states whether it sits inside or outside the audited statements and what was added or removed versus the nearest audited number. Produces a boundary table, the list of figures outside the boundary, and a plain-English summary of who is vouching for what. Educational, not financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。