Conduct a GxP audit of computerized systems and processes. Covers audit planning, opening meetings, evidence collection, finding classification (critical/major/minor), CAPA generation, closing meetings, report writing, and follow-up verification. Use for scheduled internal audits, supplier qualification audits, pre-inspection readiness assessments, for-cause audits triggered by deviations or data integrity concerns, or periodic compliance posture reviews of validated systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
pjt222/agent-almanac☆ 372026年10月15日 更新
Design and implement multi-stage CI/CD pipelines using GitHub Actions with matrix builds, dependency caching, artifact management, and secret handling. Create workflows that span linting, testing, building, and deployment stages with parallel execution and conditional logic. Use when setting up automated testing and deployment for a new project, migrating from Jenkins or CircleCI to GitHub Actions, implementing matrix builds across platforms, adding build caching, or creating multi-stage pipelines with security scanning and quality gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
pjt222/agent-almanac☆ 372026年10月15日 更新
Achieve distributed agreement without central authority using bee democracy, threshold voting, and quorum sensing. Covers proposal generation, advocacy dynamics, commitment thresholds, deadlock resolution, and consensus quality assessment. Use when a group must decide between options without a designated leader, when centralized decision-making is a bottleneck, when stakeholders have different perspectives to integrate, or when designing automated systems that must reach consensus such as distributed databases or multi-agent AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
pjt222/agent-almanac☆ 372026年10月15日 更新
AI situational awareness — internal threat detection for hallucination risk, scope creep, and context degradation. Maps Cooper color codes to reasoning states and OODA loop to real-time decisions. Use during any task where reasoning quality matters, when operating in unfamiliar territory, after detecting early warning signs such as an uncertain fact or suspicious tool result, or before high-stakes output like irreversible changes or architectural decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
pjt222/agent-almanac☆ 372026年10月15日 更新
Shared conventions for every SDLC development-phase architect agent: hard rules, code quality bar, workflow steps (superpowers invocation, spec reading, codebase exploration, verification), and the report/compact-summary contract. Architects load this skill first, then apply their stack-specific instructions on top.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AratKruglik/claude-sdlc☆ 372026年9月21日 更新
Maven and Gradle build tool conventions for Java projects: build tool detection, wrapper usage, dependency management, BOMs, plugin configuration, semver, and multi-module layouts. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every Java plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Detect which build tool is in use and invoke it correctly. - Manage dependencies safely (BOMs, version properties, no wildcard versions). - Configure compiler, test, and code-quality plugins. - Handle multi-module projects. Do NOT use this skill for: - Framework-specific build plugins (Spring Boot Gradle plugin — in spring-boot-plugin:spring-conventions). - CI/CD pipeline config.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AratKruglik/claude-sdlc☆ 372026年9月21日 更新
Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tradermonty/claude-weekly-trade-strategy☆ 372026年10月13日 更新
Use when setting up or modifying CI/CD pipelines, quality gates, test runners, or deployment pipeline configuration through workflow files. Not for triggering a deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin☆ 372026年9月29日 更新
Use when a rendering path needs stable frame-time, CPU, GPU, and memory evidence against fixed targets. Not for one-shot profiling or visual quality review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin☆ 372026年9月29日 更新
Use when asked to build or modify production-quality components, layouts, state, and pages with WCAG 2.1 AA and real content. Not for token-system design: use frontend-design-deslop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin☆ 372026年9月29日 更新
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "$aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TheDragonCode/laravel-feeds☆ 362026年10月15日 更新
Code quality guidelines and best practices for writing clean, maintainable code. Covers naming, structure, error handling, testing, and code review standards. Use when writing code, reviewing, refactoring, or asking "how should I name this", "best practice for", "clean code".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TheDragonCode/laravel-feeds☆ 362026年10月15日 更新
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
cline/skills☆ 362026年7月21日 更新
Solve competition math problems (IMO, Putnam, USAMO, AIME) with adversarial verification that catches the errors self-verification misses. Activates when asked to 'solve this IMO problem', 'prove this olympiad inequality', 'verify this competition proof', 'find a counterexample', 'is this proof correct', or for any problem with 'IMO', 'Putnam', 'USAMO', 'olympiad', or 'competition math' in it. Uses pure reasoning (no tools) — then a fresh-context adversarial verifier attacks the proof using specific failure patterns, not generic 'check logic'. Outputs calibrated confidence — will say 'no confident solution' rather than bluff. If LaTeX is available, produces a clean PDF after verification passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
cline/skills☆ 362026年7月21日 更新
Migrate workloads from Google Cloud Platform to AWS — including AI and agentic workloads regardless of cloud provider. Triggers on: migrate from GCP, GCP to AWS, move off Google Cloud, migrate Terraform to AWS, migrate Cloud SQL to RDS, migrate GKE to EKS, migrate Cloud Run to Fargate, Google Cloud migration, migrate from OpenAI to Bedrock, move off OpenAI, switch from ChatGPT API to AWS, migrate from Gemini to Bedrock, migrate LangChain to Bedrock, migrate LangGraph to AWS, migrate agentic workloads to AWS, move AI workloads to AWS, migrate my AI app to AWS. Runs a 6-phase process: discover GCP resources from Terraform files, app code, or billing exports, clarify migration requirements, design AWS architecture, estimate costs, generate migration artifacts, and collect optional feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. Includes AI provider migration guidance (for example, OpenAI to Amazon Bedrock) by selecting closest-fit Bedrock model families for required modality, latency/quality targets, context windows, and cost constraints. Model mapping is compatibility-guided, not 1:1 parity; validate prompts, tool-calling behavior, and eval metrics before cutover. Do not use for: Azure or on-premises migrations to AWS, AWS-to-GCP reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, GCP-to-GCP refactoring, or multi-cloud deployments that do not involve migrating off GCP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
cline/skills☆ 362026年7月21日 更新
Multi-angle code and plan review with security, scope, and UI profiles. Use when reviewing code, plans, PRs, or running pre-merge quality gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tim-hub/powerball-harness☆ 352026年8月5日 更新
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
cline/plugins☆ 352026年10月14日 更新
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "$aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
letuhao/lore-weave☆ 342026年10月6日 更新
Code quality guidelines and best practices for writing clean, maintainable code. Covers naming, structure, error handling, testing, and code review standards. Use when writing code, reviewing, refactoring, or asking "how should I name this", "best practice for", "clean code".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
letuhao/lore-weave☆ 342026年10月6日 更新
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "/aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
letuhao/lore-weave☆ 342026年10月6日 更新
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas. Use when asked to "weekly retro", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
WillNigri/Agentic-Tool-Optimization☆ 342026年9月8日 更新
Apply LaReine's quality bar when judging an answer, an artifact or a method.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
infinition/LaRuche☆ 332026年9月22日 更新
Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
fellipeutaka/kanpeki☆ 332026年8月28日 更新
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
fellipeutaka/kanpeki☆ 332026年8月28日 更新