4,396 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guides development and approval of Binding Corporate Rules under GDPR Article 47 for intra-group international data transfers. Covers Art. 47(2)(a)-(n) content requirements, BCR approval process with lead supervisory authority, and WP256/WP257 referentials. Keywords: BCR, binding corporate rules, intra-group transfers, Art. 47.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements technical breach detection capabilities including SIEM integration, DLP alert configuration, anomaly detection rules, and insider threat monitoring. Provides a breach classification taxonomy across confidentiality, integrity, and availability dimensions. Covers detection tool selection, alert tuning, and integration with privacy incident response workflows. Keywords: breach detection, SIEM, DLP, anomaly detection, insider threat, classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements automated data deletion workflows for GDPR Article 17 right to erasure and retention period expiry. Covers cascading deletion across dependent systems, dependency handling for referential integrity, confirmation logging, and audit trail generation. Activate for automated deletion, erasure automation, data purge, retention expiry queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts digital forensics investigations following a personal data breach, covering evidence preservation, chain of custody documentation, log analysis, scope determination, and root cause analysis. References industry-standard tools including Splunk, ELK Stack, and Wireshark. Provides forensic workflow from initial evidence collection through final investigation report. Keywords: digital forensics, breach investigation, evidence preservation, chain of custody, root cause analysis, Splunk, ELK, Wireshark.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
只读检索小红书公开内容，并把账号数据、标题、封面、互动量、作者近期内容和低粉爆款整理成可追溯证据。用户要求查公开账号或笔记数据时使用；不得点赞、收藏、评论、发布、删除或导出登录凭证。 English: Read-only research for public Xiaohongshu content, collecting traceable evidence such as account data, titles, covers, engagement, recent posts, and low-follower breakout examples. Use for public account or post research; never like, save, comment, publish, delete, or export credentials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a work-items.md file (produced by /plan-work-items) into Linear issues, one per slice, in a single target Linear team. Use when you want to publish work items as Linear issues, create implementation tickets to track in Linear, or push a broken-down plan into a Linear team. Requires a configured Linear MCP server and a target team. Reads the team's real workflow states, labels, Projects, and members and resolves every option against them before creating anything; defaults each issue to the team's initial state, unassigned, uncategorized, with no parent or Project unless you ask. Links within-file `Depends on` relationships as native Linear "blocked by" relations and annotates the source file so re-runs resume cleanly. Does not produce the work-items file itself — use plan-work-items first. Does not post to Jira — use work-items-to-jira. Does not post to GitHub — use work-items-to-issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide Claude to use SigCLI correctly — check auth, login, get credentials, configure providers, and onboard new websites. Trigger when using sig commands, editing ~/.sig/config.yaml, or needing authenticated API access.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive your own Claude Code session from Basecamp. Starts the local connector (basecamp connect), which listens to the account's event feed as a Basecamp agent and prints one line per trusted request: a mention, an assignment, a comment on a thread the agent follows, a boost on something it wrote. This session acknowledges each one that asks for something within seconds (a boost in its own words), picks the repo for the project, and hands the request to a background subagent that reads the context, does the work with your settings and tools, and replies as the agent. The session stays free to take the next request, and you can keep using it. Also connects an agent to this computer and manages its setup: the agent's credential (basecamp auth agent connect), who may give it work, and which projects it serves (basecamp connect setup), plus status and doctor. Use when asked to connect an agent, drive agents from Basecamp, watch Basecamp for an agent's mentions, start or stop the connector, or change who can give the agent work or which projects it serves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan Seedance 2.0 music-video clips where performance, camera, scene changes, spatial lyric typography, and transitions respond to a locked music window. Use for 4–15 second hooks or longer multi-clip MVs with explicit audio/lyric ownership, subject and scene references, beat-led events, and assembly handoffs; not for ordinary caption cleanup or unlicensed lyric copying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when scanning code for security vulnerabilities. Use when user says "scan security", "kiểm tra bảo mật", "security audit", "review security", or invokes `/vbs-scan-security`. For large scans (>20 main-language files OR >30 total OR >14 days) processes chunks sequentially. Outputs bilingual reports (vi/en). Optional `--auto-fix` (agentic patch + verify loop) and `--sca` (live CVE lookup via OSV.dev).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to diagnose or measure the router itself. Do not use merely because a task involves coding, verification, progress reporting, or token saving. For small or straightforward tasks, keep work in Sol unless the user explicitly requests Luna; router configuration, usage, and efficiency questions should use read-only inspection without launching a worker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parallel multi-AI cross-validation research workflow (大版本). Dispatch N internal sub-agents + grok + gemini in parallel, automatically cross-validate findings, tier by confidence (strong consensus / partial / conflict / insufficient), generate tiered action items with arbitration. Use when user says "多 AI 调研", "交叉验证", "独立共识", "三脑调研", "multi-ai research", "parallel research", "cross-validate", or needs deep research that benefits from internal data + external 2026 consensus. NOT for quick factual Q&A, pure code reasoning, or tasks needing deep project context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect known malicious npm package versions and install-time supply-chain indicators in repositories, lockfiles, and node_modules. Use when a user mentions an npm compromise, Shai-Hulud, the Keyv/cacheable incident, suspicious preinstall scripts, credential-stealing packages, or asks whether a JavaScript project was exposed to a package supply-chain attack. Do not use as a general CVE or license audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade web frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use when the user explicitly asks to build or substantially redesign a web component, page, or application. Only applies when repository inspection confirms that the visual surface is a browser-rendered web UI. Do not use for native or GPU-rendered graphics, shaders, games, terminal UIs, or other non-web visual systems. Ignore incidental mentions and traces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies Judea Pearl's causal reasoning frameworks to distinguish correlation from causation, evaluate AI capabilities, and make counterfactual decisions. Reach for this skill whenever Claude encounters questions about causal inference, structural causal models, the limitations of deep learning, AGI, experimental design, covariate selection, or personalized decision-making. Trigger this skill for topics involving Bayesian networks, the do-calculus, the Ladder of Causation, or when a user tries to answer 'what if' or 'why' questions using purely observational data. Pearl's principles are essential for moving beyond probability calculus into true causal understanding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning style of Kaiming He, computer vision pioneer and creator of ResNet. Use this skill whenever you are designing deep learning architectures, debugging neural network optimization, formulating generative AI problems, or bridging AI with other scientific domains. Trigger this skill for discussions on network depth, weight initialization, residual learning, flow matching, or when reframing discriminative tasks as conditional generation. It emphasizes simplicity in complex visual problems, end-to-end optimization, and viewing AI as a universal language for science.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, AI safety frameworks, and deep learning principles of Yoshua Bengio (Turing Award winner, Mila). Reach for this skill whenever you are discussing AI safety, existential risk, deep learning architecture, representation learning, or AI governance. Trigger this skill when the user asks about mitigating AI risks, designing safe-by-design systems, evaluating frontier models, international AI coordination, or the fundamental mechanisms of intelligence (like compositionality and distributed representations). Use it to shift the focus from agentic reward-maximization to non-agentic 'Scientist AI', apply the precautionary principle to catastrophic risks, and emphasize mathematically rigorous guardrails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, principles, and frameworks of Jürgen Schmidhuber (LSTM co-inventor and deep learning pioneer). Reach for this skill whenever tackling problems involving sequence learning, artificial curiosity, intrinsic motivation, reinforcement learning architectures, or predicting long-term technological and cosmic evolution. Use this when discussing AGI timelines, the history and attribution of AI breakthroughs, data compression as learning, or when designing autonomous agents that must set their own goals. Trigger this skill for topics like recurrent neural networks, algorithmic information theory, open-source AI democratization, and evaluating true existential risks versus media hype.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and optimize pricing strategies for SaaS products including tiering, packaging, value metrics, and experimentation. Use when setting initial pricing, optimizing conversion, expanding revenue, or when users ask about pricing strategy, monetization, or revenue optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing organizational structure (team topologies, Conway's Law alignment), mapping stakeholders by power-interest for change initiatives, defining team interface contracts (APIs, SLAs, decision rights, handoffs), assessing capability maturity (DORA, CMMC, agile maturity models), planning org restructures (functional to product teams, platform teams, shared services), or when user mentions "org design", "team structure", "stakeholder map", "team interfaces", "capability maturity", "Conway's Law", or "RACI".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when ranking backlogs, deciding what to do first based on effort vs impact (quick wins vs big bets), prioritizing feature roadmaps, triaging bugs or technical debt, allocating resources across initiatives, identifying low-hanging fruit, evaluating strategic options with 2x2 matrix, or when user mentions prioritization, quick wins, effort-impact matrix, high-impact low-effort, big bets, or asks "what should we do first?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Competitive intelligence, market analysis, and strategic positioning for product differentiation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。