「main」の検索結果

Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering. USE FOR: .NET architecture choices; layer and domain boundary review; service decomposition; clean architecture, vertical slice, DDD, CQRS, and modular monolith decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain classic ASP.NET applications on .NET Framework, including Web Forms, older MVC, and legacy hosting patterns, while planning realistic modernization boundaries. USE FOR: working in Web Forms, legacy MVC, or classic ASP.NET applications; reviewing old IIS-centric configuration and lifecycle behavior; planning migration toward ASP.NET Core. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or reorganize .NET solutions with clean project boundaries, repeatable SDK settings, and a maintainable baseline for libraries, apps, tests, CI, and local development. USE FOR: creating a new .NET solution or restructuring an existing one; setting up Directory.Build.props, shared package management, or repo-wide defaults; defining project. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill before answering or editing whenever an MSTest v1/v2 project is being upgraded or repaired for v3. Triggers include QualityTools assembly references; MSTest.TestFramework/TestAdapter 1.x-2.x; "upgrade to MSTest v3"; comparing v1 and v2 migration paths; choosing MSTest or MSTest.Sdk; CS0411/CS1503 after a v3 package bump; DataRow type mismatch, MSTEST0014, or "Test data doesn't match method parameters"; .testsettings/LegacySettings to .runsettings; timeout changes; and net5.0 or other dropped v3 TFMs. Still use it when packages say 3.x but migration source errors or legacy settings remain. Preserve VSTest/MTP. Do not use for a clean v3 project, v3-to-v4, framework conversion, or runner-only migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or maintain controller-based ASP.NET Core APIs when the project needs controller conventions, advanced model binding, validation extensions, OData, JsonPatch, or existing API patterns. USE FOR: working on controller-based APIs in ASP.NET Core; needing controller-specific extensibility or conventions; migrating or reviewing existing API controllers and filters. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, maintain, or modernize Windows Forms applications with practical guidance on designer-driven UI, event handling, data binding, MVP separation, and migration to modern .NET. USE FOR: working on Windows Forms UI, event-driven workflows, or classic LOB applications; migrating WinForms from .NET Framework to modern .NET; cleaning up oversized form code. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain or assess Workflow Foundation-based solutions on .NET Framework, especially where long-lived process logic or legacy designer artifacts still matter. USE FOR: WF activities and workflows; designer-backed process logic; long-lived workflow state and persistence; keep, isolate, or replace decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access review. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Crawl websites and extract content from multiple pages via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants to crawl a site, download documentation, extract an entire docs section, bulk-extract pages, save a site as local markdown files, or says "crawl", "get all the pages", "download the docs", "extract everything under /docs", "bulk extract", or needs content from many pages on the same domain. Supports depth/breadth control, path filtering, semantic instructions, and saving each page as a local markdown file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and list all URLs on a website without extracting content, via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants to find a specific page on a large site, list all URLs, see the site structure, find where something is on a domain, or says "map the site", "find the URL for", "what pages are on", "list all pages", or "site structure". Faster than crawling — returns URLs only. Essential when you know the site but not the exact page. Combine with extract for targeted content retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the web with LLM-optimized results via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants to search the web, find articles, look up information, get recent news, discover sources, or says "search for", "find me", "look up", "what's the latest on", "find articles about", or needs current information from the internet. Returns relevant results with content snippets, relevance scores, and metadata — optimized for LLM consumption. Supports domain filtering, time ranges, and multiple search depths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

构建和完善项目的领域模型。当讨论代码库术语、编写或编辑 GLOSSARY.md，或记录或编辑 ADR 时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or maintain Workspace cards, report tabs and Markdown deliverables with consistent styling, working media previews and clear project organization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render an interactive, self-contained HTML companion for a GEO content brief (04-content-brief) or a publish-ready draft (05-production), so a NON-technical client reviewer (founder, organizer staff, the domain expert filling slots) can fill REQUIRED-FILL slots, leave section-level comments, and approve/return work in the browser instead of editing Markdown. Use when a brief or draft needs to go to a client/expert for review, or when building the briefs/index.html entry page for a client folder. The reviewer's input comes back as a JSON file that 04-content-brief Step 9 ingests. Visual quality is delegated to the frontend-design skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates English pull request titles and bodies by comparing the current branch with main. Use when the user asks to draft PR content, summarize branch changes, or produce a PR title/body from git diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems and need a structured, repeatable ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality-attribute review covering Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, Compatibility, Interaction Capability, Reliability, Security, Maintainability, Flexibility, and Safety, producing an engineering review report rather than an interactive ADR discovery. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic Hexagonal architecture guidance for Java projects - ports and adapters boundaries, application core independence, driving and driven adapters, dependency direction, infrastructure leakage detection, optional architecture tests, and evidence-backed remediation. This should trigger for requests such as Review Hexagonal architecture; Review ports and adapters boundaries; Enforce dependency direction; Add ArchUnit architecture tests; Detect infrastructure leakage in domain code; Improve ports and adapters boundaries. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to use Spring Data JDBC with Java records — including entity design with records, repository pattern, immutable updates, aggregate relationships, custom queries, transaction management, and avoiding N+1 problems. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Spring Data JDBC; Apply best practices for Spring Data JDBC in Java code; Model Spring Data JDBC aggregates with Java records; Review Spring Data JDBC repositories and aggregate boundaries; Improve optimistic locking or domain events in Spring Data JDBC. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need programmatic JDBC in Quarkus — Agroal DataSource, parameterized SQL, transactions, batching, and Dev Services. This should trigger for requests such as Review JDBC or SQL data access in a Quarkus project; Improve transactions and parameter binding for Quarkus JDBC; Translate SQLException to domain exceptions or stream large result sets; Fix CDI self-invocation bypassing @Transactional in Quarkus; Review Agroal DataSource usage in Quarkus JDBC. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to refactor Java code based on trusted profiling analysis findings — including reviewing repository-owned or maintainer-sanitized docs/profiling-problem-analysis and docs/profiling-solutions files, identifying specific performance bottlenecks, and implementing targeted code changes to address CPU, memory, or threading issues. This should trigger for requests such as Refactor the code with profiling; Apply profiling; Optimize hot path; Reduce allocations found in profiling; Fix CPU bottlenecks from profiling analysis. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to design, review, or improve modular monoliths with Spring Modulith in Spring Boot applications - including application module package structure, ApplicationModules verification, named interfaces, allowed dependencies, domain events, @ApplicationModuleTest, Scenario-based module tests, generated documentation, actuator exposure, observability, and event publication registry choices. This should trigger for requests such as Add Spring Modulith to a Spring Boot application; Review Spring Modulith module boundaries; Improve modular monolith architecture in Spring Boot; Add @ApplicationModuleTest tests; Generate Spring Modulith documentation. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem under exploration needs its quality attributes (non-functional requirements) identified and prioritized before architecture and design begin. This should trigger when an issue's Quality Attribute Discovery point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to discover and prioritize candidate quality attributes for a problem, before any ADR or design work starts. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for type design quality — including establishing clear type hierarchies, applying consistent naming conventions, eliminating primitive obsession with domain-specific value objects, leveraging generic type parameters, creating type-safe wrappers, designing fluent interfaces, ensuring precision-appropriate numeric types (BigDecimal for financial calculations), and improving type contrast through interfaces and method signature alignment. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for type design; Improve type design in Java code; Fix primitive obsession in Java code; Create value objects in Java code. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。