「path」の検索結果

Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the automotive standards landscape: ISO 26262, ASPICE, SAE J3016, UNECE R155, UNECE R156, and the NHTSA vehicle set. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate an automotive standard. Most are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; the one open path is the nhtsa-vehicle pack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the OUSD(R&E) guidebook Implementing a MOSA in DoD Programs (Feb 2025). Use for the Modular Open Systems Approach as a DoD acquisition + design discipline: the statutory/regulatory basis (10 U.S.C. 4401–4403, FY2017/FY2021 NDAA, DFARS), the five OUSD(R&E) pillars, the plan→modularize→identify→define→standardize interface lifecycle, technical levers (WBS/MIL-STD-881F taxonomy, standards profiling, API-first software, COTS/cybersecurity), MOSA assessment metrics and tools (PART/OAAT/KOSS/SEAM/MAUT), technology-change and DMSMS management, roadmaps, MOSA across the six AAF pathways, and contracting/IP/data-rights mechanics. SCOPE LIMITS: this is U.S. DoD weapon-system acquisition policy, not a general open-architecture or interface-standards reference — it names standards (FACE, OMS, DISR) without reproducing them, is light on detailed engineering of any specific standard, and does not cover the underlying SE processes (use dau-se-guidebook / nasa-npr-7123) or general systems-engineering theory (use sebok).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs (OUSD R&E, Sep 2023 incl. Change 2.2). Use for the defense-acquisition mechanics of program risk management: the RIO definitions (risk/issue/opportunity), the five-step risk process (plan-identify-analyze-mitigate-monitor), 1-5 likelihood/consequence scoring and the 5x5 risk matrix, the four mitigation options (accept/avoid/transfer/control), burn-down plans, issue management (probability=1), opportunity management toward should-cost, cross-program/interface risk, tailoring RIO to the six AAF acquisition pathways (UCA/MTA/MCA/Software/DBS/Services), specialized methods (RMF, MBCRA/Cyber Table Top, Agile metrics, FMECA, ITRA/DTRAM), and institutionalizing RIO via the PRMP, boards (RMB/JRMB/ROMB/RWG), tools, tiered roles, and WBS/IMP/IMS/EVM/TPM integration. This is the DoD-acquisition complement to nasa-risk (general CRM/RIDM theory) and dau-se-guidebook (the SE process frame). Does NOT teach general risk theory from scratch, and defers specialized risk regimes (system safety/ESOH, HSI, detailed cyber/RMF, spectrum) to their own DoD instructions and the relevant packs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the functional safety standards landscape: IEC 61508, ISO 26262, ISO/SAE 21434, UL 4600, SAE J3016, and ASPICE. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate a functional safety standard. All six are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; open paths point at US Government packs, which are not equivalents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD M&Q BoK (the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Body of Knowledge), v3.0 of July 2025, published by OUSD(R&E). Use for the manufacturing-and-quality view of the defense acquisition life cycle: what M&Q engineers do across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework phases (Pre-MDD, Materiel Solution Analysis, Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and Deployment, Operations and Support); the twelve M&Q threads (A–L) built on the '5 Ms'; manufacturing feasibility and producibility; Manufacturing Readiness Levels and assessments; Key/Critical Characteristics and process capability (Cp/Cpk, SPC); the standards stack (AS6500, AS9100/ISO 9001, AS9103, AS9145); technical reviews (ASR/PDR/CDR/PRR) and milestone gates; DCMA surveillance; industrial base and supply chain; and sustainment (LCSP, IPS, ILA, ISR). Scope is DoD acquisition M&Q practice on the Major Capability Acquisition path — it is a best-practice compilation, not policy, and is thin on detailed shop-floor process engineering, contract law, and the full text of the cited industry standards (which it names but does not reproduce).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verdichtet gebündelte offene Entscheidungen zu EINEM zusammenhängenden, prosa-basierten Gesamtkonzept auf Basis aller empfohlenen Varianten. Zeigt, wie die Teilsysteme nach der Umsetzung konkret ineinandergreifen, statt den Nutzer durch Dutzende isolierte Einzelfragen zu zwingen. Der Nutzer nimmt das Bild als Ganzes ab oder gibt zielgerichtete Korrekturen, die automatisch in Einzelentscheidungen übersetzt und über decision-briefing Phase 4 ins Register zurückgeschrieben werden. Nutze diesen Skill bei "wie sieht das Ganze aus wenn wir allem zustimmen", "zeichne mir das Gesamtbild", "Gesamtkonzept der Entscheidungen", "decision draw", /decision-draw, "wie greifen die Systeme zusammen". NICHT nutzen, wenn Alternativen pro Einzelpunkt diskutiert werden sollen -- das macht decision-briefing; NICHT für den Abhängigkeitsgraphen -- das macht decision-path; NICHT für strukturierte Einzelblöcke mit Optionen und Pro/Contra (auch bei eng zusammengehörigen Gruppen) -- das macht decision-shot; NICHT zur Herleitung einer einzelnen Entscheidung -- das macht decide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operating Rojo — the filesystem-to-Roblox-Studio sync tool for professional Roblox development in VS Code / Claude Code instead of the Studio editor. Use this skill whenever Rojo is involved: `rojo serve`/`rojo build`, writing or debugging `default.project.json`, rokit/rokit.toml and tool versions (Rojo, Lune, Wally), nested vs. flat path mapping (ReplicatedStorage.Project.shared), connect/port/sync problems, or when a Roblox project skeleton needs to be created. Also trigger on "rojo connect not working", "scripts end up in the wrong place in Studio", "how do I map src/ to Studio", "port 34872 in use", "ModuleScript vs Script in Rojo".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts one service catalogue entry (description, scope in and out, owners and support groups, service levels exactly as provided, request path, dependencies, charging, lifecycle) from the service team's notes, questionnaire answers or existing documents, with UNKNOWN and a question list for every field the inputs do not cover. Never invents a service level, owner or price. Use when the user asks to "write the catalogue entry for this service", "turn these questionnaire answers into a service description", "tidy this request catalogue item" or "check this draft entry for empty fields". Do not use for a how-to or known-error article, use knowledge-article-drafter instead; for operating procedures, use runbook-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve complex or high-impact problems when the cause, solution path, requirements, or proof boundary is genuinely uncertain. Use when work needs evidence-led diagnosis, consequential design or implementation, or a completion audit; do not trigger merely because work has multiple steps, or for simple facts, fully specified routine changes, or pure creative generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a second opinion from an external LLM at three checkpoints: T1 is the plan valid, T2 which path at a fork, T3 finish plus a QA breaker that tries to break the result. One structured move per exchange (PROPOSE, COUNTER, VERIFY, ACCEPT, BLOCK) with memory across turns, and every exchange mirrored into a human-visible channel. Supports a multi-vendor panel instead of a single reviewer. Triggers: "/secondop", "get a second opinion", "run the review panel".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review content quality before anything is shown or sent (vault notes, outgoing drafts, dedup merges, service files) and return an explicit pass, fail or manual-review verdict. The counterpart of a post-build test gate: that one asks whether the build works, this one whether the writing is fit to show. Triggers: "/taste-check <path|text>", "/taste", "check this note".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish an already-vetted post to a personal Facebook wall through the owner's real logged-in Chrome tab (a low-ban-risk path), rate-limit-guarded and draft-first: paste, verify what is actually in the composer, confirm after reload. Triggers: "/fb-post", "publish to facebook", "post this to my wall".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a self-contained handoff document so another session, person or machine continues the work without this session's context: decisions and why, what is done and tested, exact paths and values, open blockers, boundaries, and an explicit continue-from-here step. Lands in a synced folder with a short seed prompt. Triggers: "/handoff", "prepare a handoff", "hand this off".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn failures, logs, symptoms, or flaky behavior into a compact repro and verification plan. Use when debugging needs a reproducible failure path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a task through SIPS commands, agents, scripts, MCP tools, or bounded delegation. Use when asked to route, split, fan out, escalate, or choose the right SIPS path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, grade, rewrite, and issue funny evidence-backed tickets for generic AI-slop patterns in prose, social posts, UI/design, and code. Use when asked to de-slop writing, humanize AI copy, grade a draft, review a landing page or generated interface, remove vague claims and repetitive rhetoric, inspect AI-written code for generic abstractions and happy-path-only logic, or ticket someone for a specific quality offense. Do not use to determine whether AI authored something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for the NV oOS WordPress Playground demo blueprints — the Content Graph "Project Asteria" demo, the Complete bundle × local Ollama demo, and the Docs Hub wp.org Live Preview demo. Covers blueprint authoring patterns (embedded runPHP seed snippets, generator scripts, preview-safe vs standalone split), CORS hosting gotchas, the CI Plugin Check gate (built-ZIP scan, rsync/distignore sync, ABSPATH guards), Playground worker crash modes (PHP-side localhost fetches, inline-script UTF-8, SPA SSE-hold mount bursts, crash-truncation SyntaxErrors), local Ollama integration (OLLAMA_ORIGINS, browser policy matrix, plugin settings + assistant meta keys), and the CLI validation harness (probe builder, mount quirks, server-mode 502 boot). Use when extending or debugging the demo blueprints, adding a new Playground demo, or triaging a crashing Playground instance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use WooCommerce's customer and session APIs correctly — WC ships its own session handler (WC_Session_Handler, single wp_woocommerce_sessions table for both guests and logged-in users) and its own customer object (WC_Customer via WC()->customer), separate from $_SESSION / native PHP sessions / wp_get_current_user. AI consistently reaches for $_SESSION (breaks with page caching, setcookie (no signing, no namespacing), or user_meta for guests (impossible). The correct path is WC()->session->set/get for ephemeral per-visitor data, WC()->customer->get_billing_* for the active customer context including guests, and new WC_Customer($user_id) for one-off loads. Important — WC()->session is auto-initialized only on frontend requests (incl. admin-ajax); REST, cron, and WP-CLI must call wc_load_cart() explicitly. Use when storing per-visitor state, reading the current visitor's billing data, or debugging session loss across page caches / REST / cron. Triggers on WC_Session, WC_Session_Handler,...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register a custom Listings callback for JetEngine — the per-field transform fired when a Dynamic Field widget renders meta values (Format date, Format number, Get post title, Convert units, …). Two registration paths are supported. Legacy 3-filter via jet-engine/listings/allowed-callbacks (label), jet-engine/listings/allowed-callbacks-args (control schema), and jet-engine/listing/dynamic-field/callback-args (positional args at runtime). Modern single-call $manager->register_callback($name, $label, $args) hooked on jet-engine/callbacks/register fires the three filters internally for you. Critical contract — the callback identifier you register MUST be a real PHP callable string (a global function name OR `Fully\\Qualified\\Class::method`). Bare static method names like `'unit_converter'` fail JE's is_callable() gate at apply_callback() and the rendered field silently becomes empty. Use when scaffolding a JetEngine companion plugin's listing-field transform, when seeing "callback appl...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds and reviews custom WordPress REST API endpoints registered via register_rest_route on rest_api_init — namespace and version slug, permission_callback authorization (NEVER __return_true on state-changing routes, which is the most common plugin-side vulnerability on wp.org), args schema with validate_callback / sanitize_callback / type / enum, object-level capability checks via current_user_can with object ID, responses with WP_REST_Response and WP_Error carrying an HTTP status, no raw DB rows / sensitive columns in responses, cookie auth via X-WP-Nonce, REST vs admin-ajax decision. Recommends the better-route library when the plugin grows past a few endpoints. Use when scaffolding or reviewing a REST endpoint, or migrating from admin-ajax. Triggers on register_rest_route, rest_api_init, permission_callback, WP_REST_Request, WP_REST_Response, WP_Error, X-WP-Nonce, rest_ensure_response, register_rest_field, or any file path containing /rest/ or /api/ in a WP plugin or theme.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits WordPress plugin or theme PHP code for the most common security mistakes — missing nonce checks, capability checks, input sanitization, output escaping, unslashing, SQL preparation, AJAX nopriv exposure, file/path traversal, and unsafe redirects. Use when reviewing pull requests, before releasing a plugin, when the user asks "is this secure", or when handling code that touches $_GET / $_POST / $_REQUEST / $_COOKIE / $_FILES / $_SERVER, admin-ajax / admin-post, REST endpoints, options, user meta, custom DB queries, or file uploads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits WordPress plugin/theme code for secret-handling and credential issues — hardcoded API keys, DB credentials, or signing secrets in source; weak randomness (rand, mt_rand, uniqid) used for security tokens, password reset links, nonces, or session IDs; password storage with md5/sha1/crypt instead of password_hash; insecure cookie flags (missing Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite) on sensitive cookies; secrets logged via error_log / var_dump in production code paths. Use before plugin release, when reviewing auth/registration/login features, when integrating third-party APIs, or when the user mentions "API key", "token", "session", "password reset".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete operational guide for the NV oOS (Open Operator System) WordPress plugin in Docker/WSL2 — setup, assistant creation, credential tokens, MCP tool calling, API key auto-detection, env var bridging, common fixes, and IGCSE study configuration. Use when setting up the plugin for the first time, creating assistants programmatically, generating MCP bridge tokens, troubleshooting Docker path issues, bridging API keys, or calling tools via JSON-RPC over HTTP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。