本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

dod-mq-bok

Knowledge base from the DoD M&Q BoK (the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Body of Knowledge), v3.0 of July 2025, published by OUSD(R&E). Use for the manufacturing-and-quality view of the defense acquisition life cycle: what M&Q engineers do across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework phases (Pre-MDD, Materiel Solution Analysis, Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and Deployment, Operations and Support); the twelve M&Q threads (A–L) built on the '5 Ms'; manufacturing feasibility and producibility; Manufacturing Readiness Levels and assessments; Key/Critical Characteristics and process capability (Cp/Cpk, SPC); the standards stack (AS6500, AS9100/ISO 9001, AS9103, AS9145); technical reviews (ASR/PDR/CDR/PRR) and milestone gates; DCMA surveillance; industrial base and supply chain; and sustainment (LCSP, IPS, ILA, ISR). Scope is DoD acquisition M&Q practice on the Major Capability Acquisition path — it is a best-practice compilation, not policy, and is thin on detailed shop-floor process engineering, contract law, and the full text of the cited industry standards (which it names but does not reproduce).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(12)

  • SKILL.md17.7 KB
  • chapters/ch01-dod-mq-bok-pre-mdd.md18.4 KB
  • chapters/ch02-dod-mq-bok-msa.md18.2 KB
  • chapters/ch03-dod-mq-bok-tmrr.md22.4 KB
  • chapters/ch04-dod-mq-bok-emd.md25.0 KB
  • chapters/ch05-dod-mq-bok-prod-deploy.md19.5 KB
  • chapters/ch06-dod-mq-bok-ops-support.md30.5 KB
  • cheatsheet.md6.3 KB
  • glossary.md10.8 KB
  • LICENSE2.4 KB
  • PACK.yaml1.6 KB
  • patterns.md7.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- argument-hint: [acquisition phase, M&Q thread, MRL/MRA, producibility, Key Characteristic, process capability, technical review/milestone, DCMA, sustainment, standard number, chapter number] -->

DoD Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Body of Knowledge (M&Q BoK)

Source: OUSD(R&E) Systems Engineering and Architecture (US Government work, public domain; Distribution A) | Version: 3.0, July 2025 | Chapters: 6

When to use

Use this skill to reason about manufacturing and quality (M&Q) engineering across the defense acquisition life cycle — what an M&Q practitioner should do, when, and with which frameworks, from before a program exists (Pre-MDD) through fielding and sustainment (O&S). It answers the recurring M&Q question "Can it be built?" and frames producibility, manufacturing risk, readiness, and quality as activities that must start at the front end, not bolt on at production. It complements the broader SE/acquisition packs (dau-se-guidebook, nasa-npr-7123, gao-tra, dod-mosa) with the M&Q lens specifically.

Prerequisites: none — plain Markdown; no MCP server, API key, or licence tier needed at runtime.

How to Use This Skill

  • Without arguments — load the core frameworks below: the AAF lifecycle phases, the twelve M&Q threads, MRLs, the "Can it be built?" feasibility logic, Key Characteristics / process capability, and the standards stack.
  • With a phase — route to the chapter for that phase: Pre-MDD ch01, MSA ch02, TMRR ch03, EMD ch04, P&D ch05, O&S ch06.
  • With a topic — use the Topic Index below (e.g. "producibility", "MRL target", "Key Characteristic", "PDR", "DCMA", "LCSP", a standard number).

Supporting files: glossary.md, patterns.md, cheatsheet.md.

One scaffold, six phases. Every chapter is one acquisition life-cycle phase, and every chapter is internally organized by the same twelve M&Q threads (A–L). So you navigate by phase (which chapter) and by thread (which topic area within it).

Core Frameworks & Mental Models

What M&Q engineering is, and its one governing question

Manufacturing and Quality engineering is the specialty discipline that makes sure a defense system can actually be produced (manufacturing's role — producibility) and that it is reliable and conforming (quality's role). The BoK is a compilation of best practices and lessons learned that supports but does not supersede DoD policy, guidance, or law. Its unifying test recurs in every phase: "Can it be built?" — can this solution be produced with available capability while meeting quality, rate, cost, and schedule. A second recurring truth: M&Q influences, it does not have authority — the practitioner sits on the technical IPT and embeds credible M&Q inputs into documents and decisions others own.

The Adaptive Acquisition Framework lifecycle (the chapter spine)

The 2025 BoK is rewritten around the Adaptive Acquisition Framework (AAF), implemented by DoDI 5000.02. It documents the Major Capability Acquisition (MCA) path in detail but states the practices tailor to the other pathways (Urgent Capability Acquisition, Middle Tier of Acquisition rapid prototyping/fielding, etc.). The six MCA phases — one per chapter — and their M&Q centre of gravity:

PhaseEnds atM&Q focusHeadline reviews
Pre-MDDMateriel Development Decision (MDD)feasibility of each concept; producibility into the draft ICD and AoA guidance—
MSA (Materiel Solution Analysis)Milestone Achoose a producible concept; translate KPP/KSA → Key Characteristics; industrial-base assessmentASR
TMRR (Tech Maturation & Risk Reduction)Milestone Bdrive risk down; competitive prototyping; mature processesSRR, SFR, PDR
EMD (Engineering & Manufacturing Development)Milestone Cinfluence design, prepare for production, execute plans; pilot lineCDR, TRR, SVR/FCA, PCA, PRR
P&D (Production & Deployment)Full-Rate Production decisionLRIP → FRP; demonstrate rate maturityMRA at MRL 9/10
O&S (Operations & Support)disposalsustainment, supply chain, obsolescence, O&S costISR, ILA

The Twelve M&Q Threads (A–L) — the constant within every chapter

Each chapter walks the same twelve threads, each built on the "5 Ms" (Manpower, Machines, Materials, Methods, Measurement), on MRL criteria, and on three DoD-unique functions (acquisition, contracting, surveillance):

The three DoD-unique functions — A (DoD Acquisition System), B (Defense Contracting), and C (Surveillance) — sit alongside the engineering and resource threads: E Design, F Cost and Funding, D the Technology and Industrial Base, and G Materials Management; and the factory-and-system threads: H Process Capability and Control, I Quality Management, J the Manufacturing Workforce, K Facilities, and L Manufacturing Management and Control.

Within each thread the BoK lists Activities → Tasks (which M&Q leads or supports) → Tools → Resources. Use the threads as a tailorable per-phase checklist.

Readiness and risk: MRLs, assessments, and the RIO engine

  • Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs, 1–10) are the BoK's named best-practice yardstick for manufacturing risk, assessed via a Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA) against MRL criteria. Targets are tied to phase events (broadly MRL 4 by Milestone A, MRL 6 by Milestone B/PDR, MRL 7–8 across EMD/CDR, MRL 8 by Milestone C/PRR, MRL 9–10 in production). MRLs run parallel to Technology Readiness Levels / the TRA, which gauge Critical Technology Element maturity.
  • The DoD Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) five-step process — Plan, Identify, Analyze (likelihood × consequence), Mitigate (accept/avoid/transfer/control), Monitor — is the recurring risk engine. Missing a target triggers a Manufacturing Maturation Plan (MMP).
  • An Independent Technical Risk Assessment (ITRA) (per the DTRAM methodology, 10 U.S.C. §2448b) renders an independent judgment at Milestones A/B/C and the FRP decision — it leverages but does not merely echo the program's TRAs/MRAs.

Quality and process capability

  • Translate validated KPPs/KSAs into Key Characteristics (KC) — and Critical Characteristics (CC) where variation risks loss of life or catastrophic failure — using the Pareto principle (a few features dominate performance). Each KC is driven by a Key Manufacturing Process (KMP).
  • A process must be both capable (meets spec — Cp/Cpk, with AS9103 naming a KC target of Cpk ≥ 1.33) and in control (statistically predictable — SPC/control charts); Pp/Ppk describe actual performance over time. Reduce variation with a Variability Reduction Program (Process Control Plans, FMEA, Six Sigma/DMAIC).
  • Quality = the degree to which a product's attributes satisfy a need, managed through a Quality Management System (QMS) — typically ISO 9001 or AS9100. A conforming management system does not by itself guarantee a conforming product.

The standards stack

AS6500 (Manufacturing Management Program — the system benchmark; implemented via MIL-HDBK-896), AS9100 / ISO 9001 (QMS), AS9103 (Variation Management of Key Characteristics), AS9145 (APQP/PPAP), AS9102 (First Article Inspection), AS5553 / AS6174 (counterfeit avoidance), IEEE 15288.1/.2 (SE on defense programs / technical reviews and audits), MIL-STD-881 (WBS). (The BoK names and applies these; it does not reproduce their text — and neither does this pack.)

Surveillance, industrial base, and sustainment

  • DCMA provides contract administration and surveillance, delegated via MOA/LOD/QALI, and runs a Detection-to-Prevention (D2P) posture: verify process capability and management-system health with data rather than re-inspecting end items.
  • The National Technology and Industrial Base (NTIB) (US, Canada, UK, Australia) must be considered in MDAP planning — including single points of failure (sole/single/fragile/foreign sources), surge capacity, and supply-chain resilience.
  • After fielding, sustainment is governed by the Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP), the twelve Integrated Product Support (IPS) Elements, the In-Service Review (ISR), and periodic Independent Logistics Assessments (ILA) — with explicit attention to O&S cost, the usual dominant share of life-cycle cost.

The digital thread

Throughout, digital engineering carries M&Q data: the digital thread links requirements → design → production → V&V → sustainment → cost, via Technical Data Packages (TDP), Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), and Product Manufacturing Information (PMI) (GD&T, BOM, material specs embedded in 3D CAD).


Chapter Index

#AAF PhaseEnds atKey content
ch01Pre-Materiel Development Decision (Pre-MDD)MDDFront-end M&Q before a program exists; feasibility of each concept; producibility into ICD/AoA guidance; JCIDS chain; CTEs; NTIB; early research budget activities (6.1/6.2/6.3)
ch02Materiel Solution Analysis (MSA)Milestone A"Can it be built?"; AoA support; KPP/KSA → Key Characteristics; Acquisition Strategy/SEP; producibility framework; cost estimating; the ASR
ch03Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction (TMRR)Milestone BDriving risk down to commit to EMD; competitive prototyping; SRR/SFR/PDR; MTA rapid prototyping; process capability and yield; APQP/Lean
ch04Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)Milestone CInfluence design / prepare for production / execute plans; CDR, SVR/FCA, PCA, PRR; the pilot line and FAI/FAT; KC management cycle; producibility toolkit
ch05Production & Deployment (P&D)FRP decisionLRIP → Full-Rate Production; MRA at MRL 9/10; DCMA Manufacturing Systems Risk Assessment; QMS clause structure; counterfeit avoidance
ch06Operations & Support (O&S)disposalSustainment governance: LCSP, the 12 IPS Elements, ISR, ILA; SCOR supply chain; DMSMS/obsolescence; workforce competency; O&S cost control

Topic Index

  • 5 Ms (Manpower/Machines/Materials/Methods/Measurement) → ch02, ch01
  • Acquisition Strategy → ch02, ch03
  • Adaptive Acquisition Framework (AAF) / DoDI 5000.02 → ch01, ch04
  • Alternative Systems Review (ASR) → ch02
  • Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) → ch02, ch01, ch03
  • APQP / AS9145 / PPAP → ch03, ch04
  • AS6500 (Manufacturing Management Program) → ch04, ch05
  • AS9100 / ISO 9001 (QMS) → ch05, ch04
  • AS9103 (Variation Management of Key Characteristics) → ch04, ch03
  • Counterfeit parts avoidance (AS5553/AS6174) → ch06, ch05
  • Critical Characteristic (CC) → ch04, ch05
  • Critical Design Review (CDR) → ch04
  • Critical Technology Element (CTE) → ch01, ch03
  • DCMA surveillance / Detection to Prevention (D2P) → ch01, ch02
  • DCMA Manufacturing Systems Risk Assessment → ch05
  • Digital thread / digital engineering / TDP / PMI → ch01, ch03
  • DOTMLPF → ch01
  • DTRAM (Defense Technical Risk Assessment Methodology) → ch03, ch04
  • Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) → ch04
  • Facilities (Thread K) → ch04, ch06
  • First Article Inspection / Test (FAI/FAT) → ch04
  • FMEA → ch04, ch03
  • Full-Rate Production (FRP) → ch05, ch04
  • Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) → ch06, ch04
  • Independent Technical Risk Assessment (ITRA) → ch04, ch03
  • In-Service Review (ISR) → ch06
  • Integrated Product Support (IPS) Elements → ch06
  • Integrated Product Team (IPT) → ch03
  • JCIDS / ICD / CDD → ch02, ch01
  • Key Characteristic (KC) → ch04, ch02
  • Lean / Six Sigma / DMAIC → ch04, ch03
  • Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP) → ch06, ch05
  • Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) → ch05
  • Manufacturing feasibility ("Can it be built?") → ch02, ch01
  • Manufacturing Maturation Plan (MMP) → ch03, ch04
  • Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA) → ch04, ch05
  • Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) targets → ch04, ch05
  • Materiel Development Decision (MDD) → ch01
  • Materiel Solution Analysis (MSA) → ch02
  • Milestone A → ch02, ch03
  • Milestone B → ch03, ch04
  • Milestone C → ch04, ch05
  • Mission Engineering (ME) → ch01
  • National Technology and Industrial Base (NTIB) → ch01, ch06
  • Pilot line / production-representative environment → ch04, ch05
  • Pre-Materiel Development Decision (Pre-MDD) → ch01
  • Preliminary Design Review (PDR) → ch03
  • Process capability (Cp/Cpk, Pp/Ppk) → ch04, ch03
  • Producibility → ch04, ch02
  • Production and Deployment (P&D) → ch05
  • Production Readiness Review (PRR) → ch04, ch03
  • Quality Management System (QMS) → ch05, ch04
  • Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) management → ch05, ch04
  • SCOR supply-chain model → ch06
  • Statistical Process Control (SPC) → ch03, ch04
  • Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) → ch02, ch03
  • Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction (TMRR) → ch03
  • Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) → ch03, ch02
  • Twelve M&Q Threads (A–L) → ch02, ch03
  • Variability Reduction Program → ch03, ch04
  • Workforce (Thread J) → ch06, ch04
  • Yield (First Pass / Rolling Throughput / Final) → ch03, ch02

Supporting Files

  • glossary.md — key M&Q acquisition terms (phases, MRLs, KC/CC, the standards, reviews, sustainment), alphabetical, with chapter references
  • patterns.md — eight reusable M&Q practices (front-end injection, the twelve-thread checklist, MRL-target management, KC variation control, the pilot line, the RIO/ITRA loop, process-based surveillance, LCSP sustainment) with When/How/Trade-offs
  • cheatsheet.md — decision rules, the lifecycle→M&Q-focus table, the twelve threads, the standards stack, the RIO engine, process-capability vocabulary, and tells & smells

Scope & Limits

Covers: the manufacturing-and-quality engineering view of the defense acquisition life cycle per the DoD M&Q BoK v3.0 (July 2025) on the Major Capability Acquisition path — the six AAF phases (Pre-MDD → O&S); the twelve M&Q threads (A–L) and the "5 Ms"; manufacturing feasibility and producibility; Manufacturing Readiness Levels and assessments and their phase targets; Key/Critical Characteristics and process capability/control (Cp/Cpk, Pp/Ppk, SPC, yield); the named standards stack (AS6500, AS9100/ISO 9001, AS9103, AS9145, AS9102, AS5553/AS6174, IEEE 15288.1/.2, MIL-STD-881); milestone gates and technical reviews (ASR/SRR/SFR/PDR/CDR/SVR/FCA/PCA/PRR); the RIO risk process, ITRA/DTRAM, and Manufacturing Maturation Plans; DCMA surveillance and Detection-to-Prevention; the industrial base / NTIB and supply chain; the digital thread; and sustainment (LCSP, IPS Elements, ISR, ILA, SCOR, DMSMS).

Does not cover in depth / is thin on: this is a best-practice compilation, not policy — it does not supersede DoDI 5000.02, JCIDS, or law, and defers to them. It documents the MCA path primarily, treating the other AAF pathways (UCA, MTA) as tailored/compressed variants rather than covering them fully. It is light on detailed shop-floor process engineering (specific manufacturing processes, machine setups, metallurgy) and on contract law / FAR-DFARS mechanics beyond naming the relevant parts. It names but does not reproduce the cited industry standards (AS6500, AS9100, AS9103, IEEE 15288, etc.), which are third-party copyrighted — go to the standards themselves for normative text. One internal inconsistency to note: the source gives conflicting MRL targets for the FRP decision (MRL 9 vs MRL 10) — treat the higher band as gating.

Jurisdiction / authority: US Department of Defense acquisition. The BoK is a US Government work in the public domain (Distribution A, approved for public release, DOPSR Case #25-T-2448); its guidance is best practice for DoD programs and informative — not binding — outside that context.

Source version: DoD M&Q BoK — the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Body of Knowledge — v3.0, dated July 2025, from OUSD(R&E) Systems Engineering and Architecture.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the automotive standards landscape: ISO 26262, ASPICE, SAE J3016, UNECE R155, UNECE R156, and the NHTSA vehicle set. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate an automotive standard. Most are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; the one open path is the nhtsa-vehicle pack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

cisa-cpg

無料

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

jgsystemsconsulting のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する