「quality」の検索結果

Full validation gate before committing — quality checks, tests, coverage, security scan, changelog, and companion review. Use right before a commit to verify code is ready. Trigger on "pre-commit", "validate before commit", "ready to commit", "run all checks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispatch reviews to external companion AIs (Codex, Gemini, Claude) for an independent second opinion on code changes, PR readiness, doc completeness, architecture, or implementation status. Use when you want a fresh-eyes review beyond Claude-native. Trigger on "get a second opinion", "companion review", "review my changes", "review the PR". For Claude-only quality checks use /code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a live website across 7 dimensions — SEO, performance, links, privacy, accessibility, security, content — with PASS/WARN/FAIL gates. Use when checking a deployed site's health or quality. Trigger on "audit my website", "site health", "check SEO", "is my site accessible", "website-health <url>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs critical code reviews using REVIEW.md guidelines. Evaluates code quality, architecture, testing, and domain-specific concerns (legal faithfulness, cross-law references, engine safety). Use after completing significant code changes or before merging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, screen, deeply read, synthesize, and publish recent research papers for a user-specified topic, window, count, quality/attention balance, and language. Use for evidence-anchored literature digests, cross-paper comparisons, original-language excerpts, Chinese explanations, guided Feishu setup, or Feishu research reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a lightweight pre-release readiness review of Atlassian Forge apps across manifest/module wiring, architecture, runtime compatibility, dependency posture, tests, deploy readiness, and obvious security, cost, or reliability smells. Use when the user asks "review my Forge app", "pre-deploy check", "is this app ready to ship", "review manifest", "general app review", "release readiness", or asks for a broad quality pass. Do not use for deep security audits/SAST/exploitability review, cost optimization, or diagnosing a known broken app; route those to forge-security-review, forge-cost-optimizer, or forge-debugger respectively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and tier suppliers using a weighted scorecard per SCOR DS Supplier Management practices. Score Quality, Delivery, Cost, Responsiveness, and Sustainability. Classify suppliers as Strategic, Preferred, Approved, or Conditional. Use during vendor reviews or procurement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured root cause analysis using Ishikawa (Fishbone), 5 Whys, and Pareto methods. Suitable for production incidents, quality defects, customer complaints, and recurring operational problems. Use when problems recur or when initial fixes do not resolve the issue. Do not use for one-time, obvious fixes or strategic decision-making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multilingual communication, translation, localization, and language quality skill for translating, rewriting, localizing, summarizing, tone-matching, and reviewing content across languages. Use for multi-language prompts, UI strings, documentation, cultural adaptation, terminology consistency, bilingual output, language detection, and Indonesian/English or other cross-language workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevent common AI report pitfalls — bug blending, inflated threat models, and generic language. Train Claude with your best past reports for concise, technical submissions. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with BioReason-Pro predictions and reasoning traces for protein function. Use when: comparing BioReason outputs against curated reviews, converting web exports to YAML, reviewing reasoning trace quality, or running the SFT/RL comparison. Triggers: "bioreason", "GO-GPT predictions", "reasoning trace review", "bioreason comparison", "SFT vs RL".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this agent when you need to review UniProt annotation rules (ARBA, UniRule) for quality, biological accuracy, and GO annotation appropriateness. This agent performs comprehensive analysis of rule condition sets, evaluates literature support, assesses taxonomic scope, and recommends curation actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review AI Gene Review pull requests and curation changes for GO term quality, evidence support, core function identification, and annotation action justification. Use for PR review comments, review follow-up automation, and QA of gene review YAML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, create, edit, and verify PDFs with local code-execution tools and rendered-page inspection. Use whenever PDF layout, forms, extraction, merging, or final visual quality matters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a seven-agent adversarial pipeline against a resume and cover letter before submission. Produces channel-conditional verdicts anchored to the realistic applicant pool, separates materials quality from submission expected value, and ends with a contrarian pass that can overturn the verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Speed, accessibility, and testing bars every delivered app must clear — Core Web Vitals, WCAG 2.2 AA, TDD real-browser E2E, and the build-fail gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gorgeous/cinematic requirements every delivered app's UI must meet — anti-slop premium bar, exact brand tokens, motion, logo/image quality, WCAG 2.2 visual accessibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA-test a website or web app and return a 1-5 quality score (5 = flawless, 1 = broken) with evidence. Use when the user wants to test, QA, evaluate, score, or "check how good" a site, page, flow, or app — including a local dev server (e.g. "qa test localhost:5173", "does the checkout work?", "rate this landing page"). Drives a real Browser Use cloud browser, tunneling localhost automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates and scores SKILL.md files against the agentskills.io specification; use when linting skills for cross-agent compatibility, description quality, or capability graph structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curate evidence-backed collateralQuality and whole-book custodyModel labels. Use when adding a stablecoin or auditing Selector custody eligibility and DDR depeg-duration verdicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused single-target audit of one Gaia skill, named skill, or real-skill catalog item. Use this skill when: auditing a specific skill by ID or name, a skill looks overpromoted, evidence feels thin or dead, a contributor's skill seems outdated or superseded, the rank doesn't match the source quality, evidence is mapped to the wrong Evidence Type, a skill at 3★+ is missing a working GitHub link, someone asks "does this skill deserve its stars?", or you want the smallest possible correction with validation — not a bulk sweep. This is NOT for bulk curation passes (use /gaia-curate for that) or meta-level registry sweeps (use /gaia-meta-audit). It is specifically for "fix this one skill, get it right."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。