「quality」の検索結果

Skippable Phase 0 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use only on declared need for higher-quality Stage-2 evidence: a promotion candidate, or a skill that gaia-meta-sweep flagged as under-evidenced. Given a skill id, source repo/context, and needed evidence types (benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, social-signal), it runs Firecrawl searches, scrapes top hits to markdown, and appends discovered sources into Phase 1 inputs. Missing benchmark evidence is recorded as benchmark-source candidates first, not direct scoring rows. Trigger phrases: "discover evidence", "find new evidence", "Phase 0", "run ev-discovery", "search for benchmarks/papers", "under-evidenced", "promotion candidate needs stronger proof". This is the ONLY ev-* skill that searches the web for NEW evidence; other ev-* skills aggregate or verify known sources. Requires Firecrawl to be usable (`firecrawl --status` authenticated OR FIRECRAWL_API_KEY set); skips gracefully when neither holds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-mortem analysis of a PhysicsIntern workspace run (Claude Code, Pi, Codex, or OpenCode host). Reconstructs the trajectory from the session record — JSONL file(s) for Claude/Pi/Codex, the SQLite store for OpenCode — audits methodology adherence against the workspace's own CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md and skill/agent prompts, checks commit discipline and flag dispositions, and assesses substantive quality. Produces a thorough evidence-anchored markdown report. Use after a workspace has been worked on to identify what went well, where the methodology slipped, and what prompts to improve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create visually polished, editable PPT/PPTX presentations in a clean PPTPRO style. Use when the user asks for a beautiful, designed, non-generic PowerPoint deck, especially course presentations, reading applications, source-backed slides, scripts matched to slide pages, or requests to avoid AI-looking beige/card templates and repeatedly check visual quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces. Covers visual design systems, typography, color, motion, spatial composition, and web interface standards. Use when designing UI, establishing design systems, or reviewing visual quality of frontend code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Offline time-stretch / pitch / varispeed — character modes, fine-tune presets, A/B toolkit, and the honest quality state, so an agent can pick a mode, dial it in, and ship a plugin with it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judge whether a change made things better with demonstrable proxy measures tied to the mechanism it targets, not wall-clock time. Load before choosing acceptance measures for any before/after or A/B claim — CI and fleet speed-ups, build speed, DSP/audio quality, render fidelity. Each proxy names its data source, detection floor and sample size, and every zero is paired with a control on the same instrument.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evaluation frameworks for LLM systems — harness design, graders, datasets, regression tracking, and human-in-the-loop eval. Use when you need systematic measurement of model or agent quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test frontend code: unit, component, E2E, visual regression, and accessibility tests with a sane pyramid. Use for reliable UI quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Distill large models into smaller ones — teacher-student training, data generation, loss design, and quality validation. Use when you need big-model behavior at small-model cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design annotation pipelines that produce reliable training labels — guidelines, agreement measurement, and quality control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split documents for retrieval effectively — fixed, semantic, structural, and hierarchical chunking with overlap tuning. Use when RAG retrieval quality depends on how documents are divided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate UI with AI tools effectively: prompt structure, design-system grounding, iteration technique, and evaluating output quality. Use when using AI to create interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic checklist for diagnosing audio artifacts. Use when the user describes a sound quality problem — clicks, pops, crackling, silence, DC offset, aliasing, phase issues, or latency problems. Trigger on phrases like "why do I hear clicks?", "my output has DC offset", "there's aliasing in my oscillator", "phase is wrong in mono", "dropout when CPU spikes". Pairs with audio-dsp-review (realtime safety) and audio-numerics-review (numeric correctness) — use those to fix once the cause is found.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete methodology for computing publication-quality cumulative abnormal returns with proper event-study test statistics, matching the robustness of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 for Stata. Covers dateline construction, event-date mapping, estimation and event windows, thin-trading adjustment, OLS with Theil prediction error correction, abnormal return computation, CAR/CAAR/AAR accumulation, boundary contamination guards, and common tests such as Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen, generalized sign, Wilcoxon, and GRANK-T. Use when the user mentions abnormal returns, event windows, market-model regressions, CARs, CAAR, AAR, eventstudy2, thin trading, trade-to-trade returns, or event-study test statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrades existing websites and apps to premium quality. Audits current design, identifies generic AI patterns, and applies high-end design standards without breaking functionality. Works with any CSS framework or vanilla CSS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation. Use at milestone checkpoints or when evaluating readiness for a milestone deadline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when absorbing ideas, capabilities, workflows, architecture, quality systems, ecosystem extensions, or engineering practices from any reference system into the current project through original, project-native redesign rather than copying.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create publication-quality, editable scientific and engineering schematics with explicit physical meaning, exact labels, visual hierarchy, and provenance. Use for experimental facilities, thermal-fluid mechanisms, workflows, graphical abstracts, system architectures, or research diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Education and Childcare Administrator for Preschool/Daycare settings — running a preschool or childcare center's operations, evaluating a curriculum or staffing decision, handling a licensing/regulatory compliance issue, or balancing enrollment/financial sustainability against program quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。